Cover not available

Review article published In: Embodied, Social, and Creative Dimensions of Metonymy
Edited by Marlene Johansson Falck and Thomas Wiben Jensen
[Metaphor and the Social World 15:2] 2025
► pp. 205–217

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Forum

Looking back on the metaphor-metonymy divide

Making peace with blurred boundaries and shape-shifters

ORCiD logo with link | University of Oslo
Published online: 2 October 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.25029.odo
Abstract
Recent research suggests more overlaps between metaphor and metonymy than is often suggested by theoretical and applied studies, which can frequently tend towards cleanly identifying between these figurative operations and presenting a neat set of (quantitative) results. However, differentiating between metaphor and metonymy in real-world contexts is notoriously tricky, and often leaves researchers in a position that demands choosing one or the other as the main focal point of the study. In this article, I reflect on the difficulty of disentangling metaphor from metonymy and vice versa, and some of the interesting research that has previously highlighted the fuzzy boundaries between them, including how these figures may “shape-shift”, across discourses, contexts, and in the mind. Overall, I suggest that concentrating more deliberatively on metaphor and metonymy’s blurred boundaries and shape-shifting tendencies is an important avenue for future research.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 2.Blurred boundaries
  • 3.Shape-shifters
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
References (26)
References
Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 31–58). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, J. A. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Visual Metaphor and Embodiment in Graphic Illness Narratives. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2011). The Allegorical Impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 121–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Metaphorical experience: Contiguity or cross-domain mappings? Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the Auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 20(1), 7–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1995). Metaphonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic Action. In L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, & J. Vanparys (Eds.), By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy, and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective (pp. 159–174). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes [University of California, Berkley]. [URL]
(1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (Vol. 1751, p. 791). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (2002). The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 41–48). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, T. W., & Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in Experience: Toward a Distributed Enactive Approach to Metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson Falck, M. (2018). From ecological cognition to language: When and why do speakers use words metaphorically? Metaphor and Symbol, 33(2), 61–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 155–170). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Julich-Warpakowski, N., & Jensen, T. W. (2023). Zooming in on the Notion of Metaphoricity: Notions, dimensions, and operationalizations. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(1), 16–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By (W. a new Afterword, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2017). Metonymy. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 407–422). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Fielden-Burns, L. V. (2023). On the fringes of metaphor: Using ambiguously figurative vague language to pragmatically negotiate sensitive topics in the English as a Medium of Instruction classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 2091, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G. (2003). How Metonymic Are Metaphors. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, 407–434.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue