Cover not available

Article In: Metaphor and the Social World: Online-First Articles

Fire, wind, and lies

Mapping the metaphorical landscape of the January 2025 Southern California wildfires

 | University of Nottingham
ORCiD logo with link | University of Brighton
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
In January 2025, devastating wildfires affected Southern California. The timing and iconic nature of these wildfires, which destroyed the properties of high-profile celebrities, created a unique opportunity to examine how metaphors function at the intersection of climate communication, celebrity culture, and public response. Various studies have analysed the metaphorical framing of extreme events, such as floods and fires, as well their implications for public and policy responses. The present study of 135 articles published in the Los Angeles Times between 7 and 17 of January 2025, the initial phase of the fires, revealed four types of metaphors, with the majority mapping what people know about human, animal, or mythical agents or objects (source domain) onto fires (target domain) and a minority mapping aspects of fires (source domain) onto human action (target domain). The first type of mapping structures conventional metaphors, situation-specific metaphors, and creative explanatory climate-informed metaphors, while the second structures fire metaphors used to frame the spread of misinformation surrounding the wildfires. The analysis revealed a shifting metaphorical landscape of conventional and situation-specific metaphors where natural forces and human behaviours are represented through interconnected conceptual frameworks. They can be used both to enhance and hinder public and policy responses to extreme and novel weather events.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Metaphors, mappings, and wildfires
    • 1.2Discourses of metaphors and wildfires
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Material and method
  • 3.Analysis and discussion
    • 3.1Conventional metaphors
      • Wildfires Are Agents
      • Wildfires Are Enemies
      • Wildfires Are Floods
      • Hurricane-Force Winds Are Agents
      • Hurricane-Force Winds Are Floods
    • 3.2Novel metaphors
      • Embers Are Storms Or Blizzards
      • Embers Are Agents
    • 3.3Misinformation metaphors
      • Misinformation Is Fire
    • 3.4Explanatory metaphors
      • Changes In Climate Conditions Are Whiplash
      • The Atmosphere is A Sponge
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
References (39)
References
Berker, M. (2025). Southern California wildfires fully contained after 24 days. AA (Anadolu Agency): Available at: [URL], accessed 23 March 2025.
Bromhead, H. (2020). The semantics of bushfire in Australian English. Meaning, life and culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka, Brisbane: ANU Press, 115–34. [URL]
(2022). Tensions in talking about disasters: Habitual versus climate-informed–The case of bushfire vocabulary in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 42(3–4), 207–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copernicus Climate Change Service (2025). 2024 is the first year to exceed 1.5°C above pre-industrial level. Copernicus: Available at: [URL]; accessed 13 March 2025.
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017). Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabbatiss, J. et al. (2025). Media reactions to the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires and the role of climate change. Carbon Brief. Available at: [URL], accessed 23 February 2025.
Gimello, F. (2025). From Embers to Rumors: Decoding the Societal Impact of the January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires on Misinformation. Preprint: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gimello-Mesplomb, F. (2025). Flames, fear and lies. How the emotional power of iconic fires such as those in Los Angeles in 2025 shapes collective memory and fuels misinformation. Available at: SSRN: [URL], accessed 2 March 2025.
Griffiths, T. (2012). Remembering. In Christine Hansen and Tom Griffiths (eds), Living with Fire: People, Nature and History in Steels Creek. Collingwood, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing, 159–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, D. J., & Fleming, M. E. (2021). Mother nature’s fury: Antagonist metaphors for natural disasters increase forecasts of their severity and encourage evacuation. Science communication, 43(5), 570–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erokhin, D. (2025). Public Discourse Surrounding the 2025 California Wildfires: A Sentiment and Topic Analysis of High-Engagement YouTube Comments. Geosciences, 15(3), 100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ko, J. W., Ni, S., Taylor, A., Chen, X., Huang, Y., Kumar, A., … & Hopfer, S. (2024). How the experience of California wildfires shape Twitter climate change framings. Climatic Change, 177(1), 17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koumoundouros, T. (2025). La fires a catastrophic example of study’s ‘hydroclimate whiplash’ warnings. Science Alert. Available at: [URL], accessed 2 March 2025.
Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor in Newspapers. Thesis. University of Utrecht: LOT.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levey, S., & Frazer-Baxter, S. A. (2025). LA wildfires more likely because of climate change, says attribution study. Imperial, 31 January: Available at: [URL], accessed 1 February 2025.
Marghetis, T., & Matlock, T. (2025). Metaphorical framing of wildfires shapes what they are, how they act, and how we should respond. Metaphor and Symbol, 40(1), 38–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T., Coe, C., & Westerling, A. L. (2017). Monster wildfires and metaphor in risk communication. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(4), 250–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGarry, A., & Treré, E. (2024). Fire as an aesthetic resource in climate change communication: exploring the visual discourse of the California wildfires on Twitter/X. Visual Studies, 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morehouse, B. J., & Sonnett, J. (2010). Narratives of wildfire: Coverage in four US newspapers, 1999–2003. Organization & Environment, 23(4), 379–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerlich, B. (2025a). Wildfires and wild liars. Making Science Public Blog, 13 January: Available at: [URL]
(2025b). Whiplash, sponges and blizzards of embers: Exploring wildlife metaphors. Making Science Public Blog, 24 January. Available at: [URL]
Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2024). Mud, metaphors and politics: Meaning-making during the 2021 German floods. Environmental Values, 33(3), 329–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2025). The destructive force of nature and the constructive force of community: Social representations of the 2024 Valencia floods in the news. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perry, T. (1996). Crews Keep Battling Stubborn Malibu Blaze; 6 Firefighters Hurt. Los Angeles Times, 23 October: [URL]
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London etc.: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pyne, S. J. (2015). The Pyrocene. Stephen J. Pyne Blog. Available here:, accessed 3 March 2025Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quante, L., Willner, S. N., Otto, C., & Levermann, A. (2024). Global economic impact of weather variability on the rich and the poor. Nature Sustainability, 7(11), 1419–1428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scire, S. (2025). The LA Times sees subscriber bump during wildfire coverage despite removing paywall. NiemanLab, 13 January. Available at: [URL], accessed 1 March, 2025.
Silaški, N. (2009). Topic-triggered metaphors in newspaper headlines. Professional communication and Translation Studies, 2(1–2), 59–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slowikowski, S., & Motion, J. (2021). Unlocking meaning of embodied memories from bushfire survivors. The Oral History Review, 48(1), 83–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, D. L., Prein, A. F., Abatzoglou, J. T., Albano, C. M., Brunner, M., Diffenbaugh, N. S., Singh, D., Skinner, C. B., & Touma, T. (2025). Hydroclimate volatility on a warming Earth. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 6(1), 35–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terracina-Hartman, C. (2020). Fanning the flames: How US newspapers framed 10 historically significant US wildfires. Newspaper Research Journal, 41(3), 368–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toor, A. (2014). Nobody will escape the effects of climate change, UN warns. The Verge. Available at: [URL], accessed 5 February 2025.
United Nations (2025). It’s official: January was the warmest on record. UN News, February. Available at: [URL], accessed 6 March 2025.
Wilson, R. S., McCaffrey, S. M., & Toman, E. (2017). Wildfire communication and climate risk mitigation. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Science, (pp.1–31). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, R. (2022). Climate scientists warn of a ‘Global wildfire crisis’. The New York Times, 23 February. Available at: [URL], accessed 2 February 2025.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue