Introduction published In: Embodied, Social, and Creative Dimensions of Metonymy
Edited by Marlene Johansson Falck and Thomas Wiben Jensen
[Metaphor and the Social World 15:2] 2025
► pp. 185–195
Introduction
Embodied, social, and creative dimensions of metonymy
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Umeå University.
Published online: 19 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24034.joh
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24034.joh
Abstract
Metonymy has traditionally been studied as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon closely linked to metaphor. Nevertheless, the connection between metaphor and metonymy requires further exploration. This special issue examines the embodied, social, and creative dimensions of metonymy, emphasizing its role in authentic language use and multimodal contexts. The contributions provide different scholarly and empirical perspectives drawing on naturalistic data from diverse genres and modalities, including spoken interaction, fiction, advertising, and corpus data. By focusing on metonymy and how it is used across different types of naturalistic data, we aim to facilitate a discussion about the various dimensions relevant to comprehending the full complexity of metonymy and its relationship to metaphor. Together, these articles demonstrate that metonymy is not merely a referential tool, but rather a flexible, embodied, and socially grounded mechanism for meaning making across various contexts, providing shortcuts to shared encyclopedic knowledge and social meaning, and as such deserving more attention in studies of figurative language.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Outline of the volume
- 3.Concluding discussion
- Note
References
References (29)
Barcelona, A. (2003a). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. De Gruyter, Inc..
(2003b). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). De Gruyter, Inc.
Cameron, L. J. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & society, 18(2), 197–222.
Dirven, R. (2002). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization [1993]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75–112). De Gruyter, Inc.
Downing, L. H., & Mujic, B. K. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178.
El Refaie, E. (2013). Cross-modal resonances in creative multimodal metaphors: Breaking out of conceptual prisons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 236–249.
(2022). Metaphorical experience: Contiguity or cross-domain mappings? Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 7–32.
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. University of California, Berkeley.
Jensen, T. W. (2022). The indexical affordance of metaphor: stain as a case example. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(3), 208–228.
Johansson Falck, M. (2018). From ecological cognition to language: When and why do speakers use words metaphorically? Metaphor and Symbol, 33(2), 61–84.
(2024). Lexico-Encyclopedic Conceptual (LEC) Metaphors. In T. L. Fuyin (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Semantics (Vol. 31, pp. 289–311). Brill.
Johansson Falck, M., & Gibbs, R. (2012). Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 251–272.
Johansson Falck, M., & Okonski, L. (2022). Procedure for identifying metaphorical scenes (PIMS): A Cognitive Linguistics approach to bridge theory and practice. Cognitive Semantics, 8(2), 294–322.
(2023). Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS): The Case of Spatial and Abstract Relations. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(1), 1–22.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic books.
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press.
(2019). Metaphors in the Mind : Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor (First edition. ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Littlemore, J., & Tagg, C. (2018). Metonymy and text messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 481–507.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornberg, L. (2002). The roles of metaphor and metonymy in English –er nominals. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (pp. 279–320). De Gruyter, Inc..
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L. (2001). Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction. Language & Communication, 21(4), 321–357.
Zbikowsi, L. M. (2020). Music, metaphor, and creativity. In L. Hidalgo-Downing & B. Kraljevic Mujic (Eds.), Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts (pp. 43–69). John Benjamins Publishing Company.