Article published In: Embodied, Social, and Creative Dimensions of Metonymy
Edited by Marlene Johansson Falck and Thomas Wiben Jensen
[Metaphor and the Social World 15:2] 2025
► pp. 263–287
Fear metonymy in Swedish and Japanese crime fiction
Literal, conventional, and creative expressions
Published online: 21 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24031.hil
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24031.hil
Abstract
This study examines fear metonymy in one Swedish and one Japanese crime novel. A thematic analysis is employed to
establish conceptual fear metonymies grounded in physiological effects, behavioural reactions, and body organs. The types of
linguistic manifestations in the novels are analysed, along with their pragmatic function within the novels and narratological
aspects of their use.
A total of 39 conceptual fear metonymies were identified, 14 of which have not been previously recognised in
research on fear metonymy. The conceptual fear metonymies identified are largely consistent across the Swedish and Japanese
novels, reinforcing the notion that human embodied cognition clearly exhibits cross-cultural patterns.
The linguistic manifestations of conceptual fear metonymies exemplify the “Show, don’t tell” technique in creative
writing. Most of them are concise and literal in nature. Conventional phrases are predominantly metaphtonymies and exhibit some
language/culture-specific characteristics. Creative linguistic expressions, meanwhile, reflect the author’s unique style and
further emphasise the emotional state of the characters to the reader. In certain scenes, expressions based on multiple conceptual
fear metonymies combine to generate a heightened level of intensity, whereas in others, a single expression effectively conveys
fear.
Finally, fiction emerges as a highly conducive material for the analysis of emotion metonymy.
Keywords: fear, metonymy, Swedish, Japanese, crime fiction
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical assumptions
- 3.Previous research on fear metonymy: Universal and culture-specific traits
- 4.Emotion metonymy in fiction
- 5.Data and method
- 6.Results
- 6.1Conceptual fear metonymies in the two crime novels
- 6.2Literal, conventional and creative expressions
- 6.3The pragmatic function of the fear metonymies in the novels and some narratological observations
- 7.Discussion and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (25)
Ansah, G. N. (2014). Culture
in Embodied Cognition: Metaphorical/Metonymic Conceptualizations of FEAR in Akan and
English. Metaphor and
Symbol, 29(1), 44–58.
Bondeson, S. (2011). Konsten att döda: Så skriver du en kriminalroman. [The Art of
killing: How to write a crime novel.] Ordfront.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using
thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Csillag, A. (2019). Fear
Expressions in English and Russian Metaphors, Metonymies and their
Interaction. In Gaál-Szabó, P., Csillag, A., Veres, O., & Kmeczkó, S. (Eds.), CULTURAL
ENCOUNTERS: New Perspectives in English and American
Studies (pp. 155–166). Debreceni Református Hittudományi Egyetem.
Dąbrowska, A. (2023). Fear
is an illness of the brain: A cognitive account of a novel constructive scenario of
fear. Lodz Papers in
Pragmatics, 19(1), 71–85.
Ekman, P. (2016). What
Scientists Who Study Emotion Agree About. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 11(1), 31–34.
Hillbom, A. 2015. Kroppens spark: Om fysiska reaktioner som uttryck för känslor i tre samtida svenska
romaner. [The Language of the Body: On physical reactions illustrating
people’s emotions in three modern Swedish novels.] In Östman, C. (Ed.), Det skönlitterära språket: Tolv texter om stil [The Language of
Fiction: Twelve Studies on
Style] (pp. 33–58). Morfem.
Kuzmics, H. (2015). Using
fiction as sociology: How to analyze emotions with the help of
novels. In Flam, H. & Kleres, J. (Eds.), Methods
of exploring
emotions (pp. 25–35). Routledge.
(2003). Metaphor
and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy:
Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive
Linguistics, 9(1), 37–77.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women,
fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago press.
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy:
Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press.
Littlemore, J., & Tagg, C. (2018). Metonymy
and text messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy. Applied
Linguistics, 39(4), 481–507.
Paul, N., Satsangi, A., & Ghosh, S. (2024). Cognitive
Semantic Analysis of Fear Expressions in Bangla and Hindi. SKASE Journal of Theoretical
Linguistics, 21(1), 92–119.
Pinelli, E. (2017). The
conceptualisation of fear in Italian and Russian: Different degrees of lexicalisation of
metonymies. In Baicchi, A. & Pinelli, E. (Eds.), Cognitive
modelling in language and discourse across
cultures (pp. 283–297). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards
a theory of metonymy. Metonymy in language and
thought, 41, 17–60.
Ströbel, L. (2015). Linguistic
Realizations of the Concept of FEAR. In Gamerschlag, T., Gerland, D., Osswald, R. & Petersen, W. (Eds.), Meaning,
Frames, and Conceptual
Representation (pp. 219–236). Düsseldorf university press.
