Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 14:2 (2024) ► pp.258–281

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Comparing metaphor elicitation models

From online surveys to classroom intervention

 | Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
 | Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Published online: 21 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.24007.nac
Abstract
Metaphor has increasingly been recognized as an effective investigative tool, especially in educational research, because it allows for insight into implicit beliefs, values and assumptions about the world around us. This article discusses methodological issues involved in ‘getting at’ students’ metaphors, the first step in metaphor analysis in educational research. Our focus is on techniques of eliciting metaphor, where respondents are overtly prompted to produce a metaphor about a particular issue. We discuss different elicitation techniques in four studies: study 1 without any scaffolding, just a prompt for eliciting metaphor; study 2 with minimal scaffolding in the form of a definition of metaphor and illustrative examples; study 3 with a brief classroom intervention before elicitation; and study 4 with a longer intervention over an entire semester. We gained the most thorough results in study 4, which also arguably provided the most valuable learning experience for the respondents. This came at a price however — a great investment of time over the course of a semester. In the event that no classroom time may be set aside for work with metaphor, the non-interventional approach of study 2 offers an acceptable alternative. Even a few explanatory lines about metaphor prove helpful in eliciting metaphor.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Metaphor elicitation
    • 2.2Challenges with metaphor elicitation
  • 3.Respondents and elicitation prompts
    • 3.1Studies 1 & 2
    • 3.2Studies 3 & 4
  • 4.Elicitation models
    • 4.1Study 1 (no scaffolding)
      • 4.1.1Elicitation technique
      • 4.1.2Results
    • 4.2Study 2 (minimal scaffolding)
      • 4.2.1Elicitation technique
      • 4.2.2Results
    • 4.3Study 3 (brief classroom intervention)
      • 4.3.1Elicitation technique
      • 4.3.2Results
    • 4.4Study 4 (periodic classroom interventions over one semester)
      • 4.4.1Elicitation technique
      • 4.4.2Results
    • 4.5Pulling it all together
  • 5.Concluding thoughts
  • Data availability statement
  • Note
  • References
References (27)
References
Bager-Elsborg, A., & Greve, L. (2017). Establishing a method for analysing metaphors in higher education teaching: A case from business management teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cibulskienė, J. (2021, 23–26 June). Spatial metaphors and attitudinal perspective in a learning process: Learning languages is like… [Paper presentation]. RaAM 14, Vilnius, Lithuania. [URL]
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 149–176). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Elicited metaphor analysis: Researching teaching and learning. In M. R. M. Ward & S. Delamont (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education. (pp. 488–505). Edward Elgar. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cömert, P. N., & Gürol, T. D. (2023). Understanding unconscious thoughts of the self: Imaginative metaphor elicitation technique in qualitative research. Yıldız Social Science Review, 9(2), 64–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creed, A., & Nacey, S. (2021). Qualitative and quantitative examination of metaphorical language use in career-life preparedness. In W. Murphy & J. Tosti-Kharas (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Careers (pp. 283–298). Edward Elgar. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, H. S. (2009). Student and teacher conceptualizations of reading: A metaphor analysis study of scripted reading interventions in secondary classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. [URL]
Deng, Y., Yang, J., & Wan, W. (2021). Embodied metaphor in communication about lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China. PLOS One, 16(12), e0261968–e0261968. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, G. (2009). Composing metaphors: Metaphors for writing in the composition classroom [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University]. [URL]
(2015). Beyond ‘elicit and run’ metaphor research: Why conversations within and between levels of participants matter. In W. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse (pp. 265–288). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, J., & Zou, W. (2022). A study of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching via metaphor analysis in a Chinese context. Journal of Education for Teaching JET, 48(5), 508–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, G. (2015). A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. In W. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse (pp. 15–37). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGrath, I. (2006). Using insights from teachers’ metaphors. Journal of Education for Teaching: JET, 32(3), 303–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, S. (2020). Figurative production in a computer-mediated discussion forum: Metaphors about relationship abuse. In A. Gargett & J. Barnden (Eds.), Producing Figurative Expression: Theoretical, Experimental and Practical Perspectives (pp. 363–388). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Systematic Metaphors in Norwegian Doctoral Dissertation Acknowledgements. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(5), 679–694.
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics (2), 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and teacher education, 26(2), 290–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2013). Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. Research Policy, 42(1), 273–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strugielska, A. (2008). Coherence Relations and Concept Dynamic in Learners’ Personal Theories. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics (5), 107–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodside, A. G. (2004). Advancing from subjective to confirmatory personal introspection in consumer research. Psychology & Marketing, 21(12), 987–1010. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Using the forced metaphor-elicitation technique (FMET) to meet animal companions within self. Journal of Business Research, 61(5), 480–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Using metaphorical conceptualisation to construct and develop ESL students’ writing: An exploratory study [Doctoral dissertation, University of York]. [URL]
Wan, W., Low, G. D., & Li, M. (2011). From students’ and teachers’ perspectives: Metaphor analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers’ roles. System, 39(3), 403–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaltman, G. (1997). Rethinking market research: Putting people back in. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 424–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaltman, G., & Coulter, R. H. (1995). Seeing the voice of the customer — metaphor-based advertising research. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 35–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zapata, G. C., & Lacorte, M. (2007). Preservice and Inservice Instructors’ Metaphorical Constructions of Second Language Teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 521–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Boers, Frank, June Eyckmans & Farahnaz Faez
2025. Using a metaphor task to explore TESOL students’ beliefs about the roles of teachers. System 135 ► pp. 103862 ff. DOI logo
İnce, Uğur, Fatih Harun Turhan & Hamza Güzel
2025. Filenin Ardındaki Anlam: Ebeveynlerin Voleybola Dair Metaforik Algıları. Spor ve Rekreasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi 7:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Kaplan, İbrahim, Mehmet Akif Karaman & Hasan Eşici
2025. Metaphoric perceptions of Turkish students on career decision-making self-efficacies and career expectations. Australian Journal of Career Development 34:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Pan, Molly Xie, Wei Lin & Angelika Pahl
2025.  A guide, cornerstone, and appetizer: An elicited metaphor analysis of Chinese university students’ perceptions of English language textbooks. PLOS ONE 20:3 ► pp. e0315292 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue