Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 15:1 (2025) ► pp.55–76

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Cognitive analysis of gas pipeline discourse

Published online: 10 February 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.23019.fra
Abstract
This paper uses cognitive discourse analysis to investigate whether differing cognitive structures and mental representations are reflected in sides of pipeline debates. Quotations were extracted from a web corpus to assign statements to identifiable actors in two pipeline protests: the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAP) and Coastal GasLink Pipeline (CGP). Statements were then grouped according to the stance of the speakers. Aspects of cognitive orientation, depth, and constructiveness were compared between the groups. Results demonstrate methods and approaches that could be adapted to place-based conflicts between communities and industries. The analysis obtains insights which could advance linguistic scholarship related to natural resources and the environment as well as enhance conceptual clarity and mutual understanding in the context of specific projects or debates.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Data & methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Cognitive orientation
    • 4.2Cognitive depth
    • 4.3Cognitive constructiveness
  • 5.Discussion
  • Note
  • References
References (60)
References
Allen, J. (2021). Infrastructural Unrest. Proceedings of Politics of the Machines, 122–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anchimbe, E. A. (2018). Postcolonial pragmatics: A theoretical framework for postcolonial multilingual societies. In E. A. Anchimbe (Eds.), Offers and offer refusals: A postcolonial pragmatics perspective on world Englishes (pp. 29–62). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baudemann, K. (2016). Towards a Postcolonial Pragmatics of Anglophone North American Indigenous Literatures: Linguistic Liberation of the Reader as a Decolonizing Act. In C. Schubert & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Pragmatic perspectives on postcolonial discourse: Linguistics and literature (pp. 171–93). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973, jan). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3 (1), 27–52. Retrieved from Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black Elk, L., & Marie Baker, J. (2020). From traplines to pipelines: Oil sands and the pollution of berries and sacred lands from northern Alberta to North Dakota. In N. J. Turner (Ed.), Plants, people, and places: The roles of ethnobotany and ethnoecology in Indigenous Peoples’ land rights in Canada and beyond (pp. 173–187). McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobby Banerjee, S., Maher, R., & Krämer, R. (2021). Resistance is fertile: Toward a political ecology of translocal resistance. Organization, 0 (0), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosworth, K. (2020). The people know best: Situating the counterexpertise of populist pipeline opposition movements. In J. McCarthy (Ed.), Environmental governance in a populist/authoritarian era (p. 12). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cialone, C., Tenbrink, T., & Spiers, H. J. (2018). Sculptors, Architects, and Painters Conceive of Depicted Spaces Differently. Cognitive Science, 42 (2), 524–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Kytö, M. (2010). Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deem, A. (2019). Mediated Intersections of Environmental and Decolonial Politics in the No Dakota Access Pipeline Movement. Theory, Culture and Society, 36 (5), 113–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
EJatlas. (2022). The Global Atlas of Environmental Justice. Retrieved 2022-03-01, from [URL]
Entman, R. M. (1993, dec). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estes, N. (2017). Fighting for our lives: NoDAPL in Historical Context. Wicazo Sa Review, 32 (2), 115–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2009). Semantic representation in LCCM Theory. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 27–55). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging. In G. Kaltenboeck, S. Schneider, & W. Mihatsch (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 15–34). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frayne, C. (2022). Corpus-based analysis of genetically modified seed discourse. Discourse & Society, 33(2), 175–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrido, J. (2011). Motion metaphors in discourse construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 107–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goeckner, R., Daley, S. M., Gunville, J., & Daley, C. M. (2020). Cheyenne River Sioux Traditions and Resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Religion and Society, 11 (1), 75–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodson, D. J., van Riper, C. J., Andrade, R., Cebrián-Piqueras, M. A., & Hauber, M. E. (2022). Perceived inclusivity and trust in protected area management decisions among stakeholders in Alaska. People and Nature, 4 (3), 758–772. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossman, Z. (2017). Fossil Fuel Shipping and Blocking: Northern Plains and Pacific Northwest. Unlikely alliances: Native nations and white communities join to defend rural lands (pp. 170–204). University of Washington Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haslam, A., Oakes, P., Turner, J., & McGarty, C. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the perceived homogeneity of ingroups and outgroups: The interaction between social motivation and cognition. In R. Sorrentino & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 182–222). Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, F. (2021). Voices of Indigenous Dallas-Fort Worth from Relocation to the Dakota Access Pipeline Controversy. Family and Community History, 24 (2), 147–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kojola, E. (2019). Bringing Back the Mines and a Way of Life: Populism and the Politics of Extraction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109 (2), 371–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 21, 458–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landén, A. S., & Fotaki, M. (2018). Gender and struggles for equality in mining resistance movements: Performing critique against neoliberal capitalism in Sweden and Greece. Social Inclusion, 6 (4), 25–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1986). An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science, 10 (1), 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levisen, C., & Waters, S. (2017). How words do things with people. In C. Levisen & S. Waters (Eds.), Cultural keywords in discourse (pp. 1–23). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, E. (2019). Race, culture, and resistance at standing rock: An analysis of racialized dispossession and indigenous resistance. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 18 (1–2), 113–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. N., & Hunter, D. (2019). The Discourse of Security: Language, Illiberalism and Governmentality. Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malan, G. (2016). Myth as metaphor. HTS Teologiese Studies, 72 (4). Retrieved from [URL].
Marks, M. P. (2019). The desire for shelter Nation- and state-building and the metaphorical discourse of fragile and collapsed states. In M.-M. Stanojević & L. Šarić (Eds.), Metaphor, nation and discourse (pp. 35–57). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Spears, R. (Eds.). (2002). Social, cultural and cognitive factors in stereotype formation. Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups. (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mengden, W. H. (2017). Indigenous people, human rights, and consultation: the Dakota Access Pipeline. American Indian Law Review, 411.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behav Brain Sci, 34(2), 57–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2008). Otherness. SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. Bloomsbury Academy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerlich, B. (2010). Breakthroughs and disasters: The politics and ethics of metaphor use in the media. In H.-J. Schmid & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns: Empirical studies (pp. 63–88). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neuliep, J. W. (2017). Intercultural Communication: A Contextual Approach. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oster, L. (2019). Field Notes from Standing Rock. CrossCurrents, 69 (2), 128–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrilli, S. (2006). Meaning, metaphor, and interpretation: Modeling new worlds, Semiotica, 2006 (161), 75–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powell, C. (2020). Resisting colonial jurisdiction: Defending Wet’suwet’en territory from fossil capital. Socialist Lawyer, 841, 36–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulitano, E. (2003). Toward a Native American Critical Theory. University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L. (2011). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26 (3), 161–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanojević, M.-M., & Šarić, L. (2019). Metaphors in the discursive construction of nations. In M.-M. Stanojević & L. Šarić (Eds.), Metaphor, nation and discourse (pp. 1–32). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, W. E. (2018, January 17). “Black snakes” or essential infrastructure: Dakota Access Pipeline, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the federal government’s tribal consultation obligations, and why this matters. Modrall Sperling Law Firm. [URL]
Tajfel, H. (2001). Social stereotypes and social groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 132–145). Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2012). Attention phenomena. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 256–289). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Temper, L., Avila, S., Del Bene, D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Le Billon, P., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., & Walter, M. (2020). Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects. Environmental Research Letters, 15 (12). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenbrink, T. (2020). Cognitive Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2002). The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse Society, 4 (2), 249–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Discourse-cognition-society. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary studies in critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–146). Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Critical Discourse Studies: a Sociocognitive Approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (3rd ed., pp. 63–85). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vlasyan, G. R. (2019). Linguistic Hedging In Interpersonal Communication. In Z. Marina Viktorovna (Eds.), Journalistic Text in a New Technological Environment: Achievements and Problems (pp. 617–623). Future Academy. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volkmann, L. (2016). Said/not Said: Discursive and Linguistic Strategies of Othering in Colonial, Post-Colonial and Post-Ethnic Literature. In C. Schubert & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Pragmatic perspectives on postcolonial discourse: Linguistics and literature (pp. 220–245). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waldron, I. (2022). Pipelines and Protests: Legacies of Struggle and Resistance in the Fight Against Environmental Racism in Canada. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 28 (2), 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaremberg, G., & Wong, M. T. (2018). Participation on the edge: Prior consultation and extractivism in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 10 (3), 29–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue