Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.178–196

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Landwhales, femoids and sub-humans

Dehumanising metaphors in incel discourse

 | Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
 | Manchester Metropolitan University
 | Lancaster University
 | Birmingham City University
Published online: 26 May 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.23005.bog
Abstract
Incels, or involuntary celibates, are a community of typically heterosexual young men who wish to, but do not, have sexual and romantic relationships with women. As a community, they have previously been characterised by their hatred for women and violent acts against members of society who they believe prevent them from having relations with women. In this paper, we highlight the pervasiveness of metaphor in incel communication, so far unaddressed in the budding studies of incel language. Specifically, using a sample of circa 22,500 words from the banned incel Reddit forum r/Braincels, we focus on how members of this community use metaphoric expressions to dehumanise gendered social actors, both as individuals and as groups. We discuss our findings against the backdrop of metaphor approaches to language, gender, and sexuality, and the relevance of dehumanising metaphorical rhetoric for online misogynist groups.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor and dehumanisation
    • 2.1Dehumanising metaphor
    • 2.2Metaphor and gender
  • 3.Data collection and metaphor identification
    • 3.1Metaphor identification procedure
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Quantitative findings: Patterns of references to gendered social actors
    • 4.2Qualitative findings: Dehumanising metaphors and social actor representation
      • 4.2.1Metaphoric representations of social actors: Dominant source domains
        • Non-Human Being
        • Object
        • Substance
        • Value Scale
      • 4.2.2Beyond source domains: Metaphor scenarios
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Author contribution statement
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Barcelona, A. (2001). On the systematic contrastive analysis of conceptual metaphors: Case studies and proposed methodology. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 117–146). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Race and the language of incels: Figurative neologisms in an emerging English cryptolect. English Today, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Shattering the bell jar: Metaphor, gender, and depression. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 199–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cottee, S. (2020). Incel (E)motives: Resentment, Shame and Revenge. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(2), 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2019). In other words: ‘The language of attraction’ used by pick-up artists. English Today, 35(2), 13–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denes, A. (2011). Biology as consent: Problematizing the scientific approach to seducing women’s bodies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(5), 411–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H. (2019). Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit. WebSci ’19 Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, 87–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, M. J. H. (2021). It all comes down to sex: Metaphorical animalisation in reggaeton discourse. In Crespo-Fernández, E. (Ed.), Discourse studies in public communication (pp. 152–176). Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., & Sun, P. (2011). Beastly: What makes animal metaphors offensive? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(3), 311–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hegstrom, J. L., & McCarl-Nielsen, J. (2002). Gender and metaphor: Descriptions of familiar persons. Discourse Processes, 33(3), 219–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaki, S., De Smedt, T., Gwóźdź, M., Panchal, R., Rossa, A., & De Pauw, G. (2019). Online hatred of women in the Incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(2), 240–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2013). Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an era. Hachette Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Words and worlds of desire: The power of metaphor in framing sexuality. In Grayling, A. C., & Wuppuluri, S. (Eds.), Metaphors and analogies in sciences and humanities: Words and worlds (pp. 363–382). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V., & Ryan, J. (2019). A nation divided: Metaphors and scenarios in media coverage of the 2016 British EU referendum. In C. Hart (Ed.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to text and discourse: From poetics to politics (pp. 131–156). Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2008). Universality and Variation in the Use of Metaphor. In N.-L. Johannesson and D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals (pp. 51–74). Department of English, Stockholm University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2), 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krendel, A. (2020). The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society, 31(6), 607–630. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krendel, A., McGlashan, M., & Koller, V. (2022). The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 291–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leyens, J. P., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J. F., Fiske, S. T., Gaunt, R., ... & Vaes, J. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism The 2002 Tajfel Lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 703–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lilly, M. (2016). ‘The World is Not a Safe Place for Men’: The Representational Politics of The Manosphere [Doctoral dissertation], University of Ottawa.
López-Maestre, M. D. (2015). ‘Man the hunter’: A critical reading of hunt-based conceptual metaphors of love and sexual desire. Journal of Literary Semantics, 44(2), 89–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Rodríguez, I. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, lenguaje y representación: revista de estudios culturales de la Universitat Jaume I, 7(1), 77–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E., and Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3), 276–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, H. (2011). Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2121, 149–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1), 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prażmo, E. (2020). Foids are worse than animals: A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 21(2), 16–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scotto di Carlo, G. (2023). An analysis of self-other representations in the incelosphere: Between online misogyny and self-contempt. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2018). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Goschler, J. (2009). Sex differences in the usage of spatial metaphors: A case study of political language. In Ahrens, K. (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 166–183). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2018). Representing the Windrush generation: metaphor in discourses then and now. Critical Discourse Studies 17(1), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tipler, C. N. & Ruscher, J. B. (2019). Dehumanizing representations of women: the shaping of hostile sexist attitudes through animalistic metaphors. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 109–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, S. P. (2018). Digesting the red pill: Masculinity and neoliberalism in the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 24(1), 84–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, D. (2020). The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community. Discourse, Context & Media, 361, 100402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Anastasi, Selenia, Tim Fischer, Florian Schneider & Chris Biemann
2025. 275IDA – Incel Data Archive. In Exploring digitally-mediated communication with corpora, ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Brookes, Gavin
2025. Language and Online Misogyny. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Félix Sousbois, Ozan
2025. Le petit carré solitaire : incels, isolement et photos-avatars comme toile politique numérique. Ethnologie française Vol. 55:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Gaufman, Elizaveta & Alsu Buiting
2025. Teaching to Love the Mother(land): Russian Z-poetry, Gendered Rhetoric and the Legitimization of War. In Language, Gender and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Gerrand, Vivian, Debbie Ging, Joshua M. Roose & Michael Flood
2025. Mapping the Neo-Manosphere(s): New Directions for Research. Men and Masculinities 28:5 ► pp. 443 ff. DOI logo
Pak, Vincent
2025. Language, Gender, and Sexuality in 2023: Writing from the Thorny Place. Gender and Language 19:1 ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Bailey, Olivia
2024. Empathy, extremism, and epistemic autonomy. Philosophical Explorations 27:2 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Bogetić, Ksenija
2024.  Not for those of us who know war well : crisis, metaphor negotiation and collective memory in an era of war . Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
O'Toole, Olga
2024. (Im)politeness as a Strategy in the Discursive Construction of In-Group Solidarity in Discussions about Love, Sex and Relationships on Incels.is. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 9:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Prażmo, Ewelina
2024. “All women are like that”: an overview of linguistic deindividualization and dehumanization of women in the incelosphere. Linguistics Vanguard 10:1 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Yakalı, Dikmen
2024. “He is just Ken:” deconstructing hegemonic masculinity in Barbie (2023 Movie). Frontiers in Sociology 9 DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer
2023. Language, gender, and (hetero)normativity. In Incels and Ideologies [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer
2023. Introduction. In Incels and Ideologies [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer
2023. Language, ethnicity, race, and racism. In Incels and Ideologies [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer
2023. Positioning incels. In Incels and Ideologies [Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality, ], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer
2025. ‘I’d Say That Being Here Has Helped Me’. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. The Dark Side of Persuasion. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue