Review published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.176–182
Book review
Petruck, M. R. L. (Ed.). (2018). MetaNet
Reviewed by
Published online: 1 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19024.mcg
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19024.mcg
References (11)
Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2007). Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 11601, 69–81.
Brouwer, H., Crocker, M. W., Venhuizen, N. J., & Hoeks, J. C. (2017). A neurocomputational model of the n400 and the p600 in language processing. Cognitive Science, 411, 1318–1352.
Carston, R. (2012). Metaphor and the literal/nonliteral distinction. In K. Allan & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 469–492). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, J. (2006). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibbs Jr., R. W., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21(3), 379–403.
Gutiérrez, E. D., Shutova, E., Marghetis, T., & Bergen, B. K. (2016). Literal and metaphorical senses in compositional distributional semantic models. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Lai, V. T., & Curran, T. (2013). ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors. Brain and Language, 1271, 484–496.
Shutova, E., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Statistical metaphor processing. Computational Linguistics, 39(2), 301–353.
