Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.100–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Is a difficult task literally heavy?

Weight biases difficulty judgements

 | University of Zagreb
 | University of Osijek
 | Institute for the Croatian Language and Linguistics
Published online: 1 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18032.ton
Abstract
The conceptualization of abstract concepts is very often metaphorical, meaning that we think and talk about abstract concepts in terms of other, usually more concrete experiences. Recent research suggests that many abstract concepts are linked to bodily sensations. In two experiments, we tested a hypothesis about weight as an embodiment of difficulty. We hypothesized that participants wearing a heavy backpack would judge a psychomotor task to be more difficult than participants wearing an empty backpack. We also hypothesized that manipulation of psychomotor task difficulty would affect judgement of backpack heaviness. In line with our hypothesis, the results demonstrated that participants wearing a heavy backpack judged the task to be more difficult. The results of Experiment 2 demonstrated that, regardless of task difficulty, there was no difference in weight judgement when backpack weight was estimated on a 7-point scale. However, we found a difference in the judgement of backpack weight when participants were asked to express it in kilograms, where weight was judged to be lower by participants doing the easy task than by those doing the difficult task.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Connection between bodily experience of weight and cognitive or emotional states
    • 1.2Assumptions
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Design and procedure
    • 2.2Results
  • 3.Experiment 2
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Design and procedure
    • 3.2Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 3281, 1712–1715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alban, M. W., & Kelley, C. M. (2013). Embodiment meets metamemory: Weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 391, 1628–1634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 577–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 591, 617–645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 751, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 1121, 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 651, 5–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 1061, 579–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 11, 327–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 1121, 155–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Despot, K., Tonković, M., Brdar, M., Essert, M., Perak, B., Ostroški Anić, A., Nahod, B., & Pandžić, I. (2019). MetaNet.HR: Croatian metaphor repository. In Bolognesi, M., Brdar, M. & Despot, K. (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age: Theory and methods for building figurative language repositories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durgin, F. H., Baird, J. A., Greenburg, M., Russell, R., Shaughnessy, K., & Waymouth, S. (2009). Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 161, 964–969. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Grudin, J. (1985). The evolution of mental metaphors in psychology: A 90-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 401, 181–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1984). The poetics of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning. Doctoral thesis, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2011). Leaning embodies desire: Evidence that leaning forward increases relative left frontal cortical activation to appetitive stimuli. Biological Psychology, 871, 1–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IJzerman, H., & Semin, G. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 201, 1214–1220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1997). Constructional grounding. Doctoral thesis, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 201, 1169–1174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouchaki, M., Gino, F. & Jami, A. (2014). The burden of guilt: Heavy backpacks, light snacks, and enhanced morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1431, 414–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Chicago, IL: Basic Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 1361, 1045–1067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1031, 737–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Metaphors in judgment and decision making. In M. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 85–108). Washington, DC: APA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libkuman, T. M., Otani, H., Kern, R., Viger, S. G., & Novak, N. (2007). Multidimensional normative ratings for the International Affective Picture System. Behavior Research Methods, 391, 326–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynott, D., Corker, K. S., Wortman, J., Connell, L., Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E., & O’Brien, K. (2014). Replication of “Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth” by Williams and Bargh (2008). Social Psychology, 451, 216–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., Hauser, D. J., Robinson, M. D., Friesen, C. K., & Schjeldahl, K. (2007). What’s ‘‘up’’ with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 931, 699–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 151, 243–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Crawford, L. E., & Ahlvers, W. J. (2007). When ‘light’ and ‘dark’ thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion, 71, 366–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 41, 705–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollio, H. R., Smith, M. K., & Pollio, M. R. (1990). Figurative language and cognitive psychology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 51, 141–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. (2012). Retrieved from [URL]
Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 191, 1219–1222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, I. K., Parzuchowski, M., Wojciszke, B., Schwarz, N. & Koole, S. L. (2015). Weighty data: Importance information influences estimated weight of digital information storage devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B. T., Jostmann, N. B. & Lakens, D. (2011). Weighty matters: Importance literally feels heavy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 21, 474–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 891, 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2014). Simulating sensorimotor metaphors: Novel metaphors influence sensory judgments. Cognition, 1301, 309–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slepian, M. L., Masicampo, E. J., Toosi, N. R., & Ambady, N. (2012). The physical burdens of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1411, 619–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spapé, M. M. & Serrien, D. J. (2010). Interregional synchrony of visuomotor tracking: Perturbation effects and individual differences. Behavioural Brain Research, 2131, 313–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szymkow, A., Chandler, J., IJzerman, H., Parzuchowski, M., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). Warmer hearts, warmer rooms. How positive communal traits increase estimates of ambient temperature. Social Psychology, 441, 167–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. J. (1996). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008a). Experiencing physical warmth influences interpersonal warmth. Science, 3221, 606–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 191, 302–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 191, 838–842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 3131, 1451–1452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Clay, Georgia, Carmen Dumitrescu, Janina Habenicht, Isabel Kmiecik, Marzia Musetti & Irena Domachowska
2022. Who Is Satisfied With Effort?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 38:6 ► pp. 452 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue