Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp.23–45

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The container and force schemas in political discourse

The representation of military strategies in Barack Obama’s discourse

 | University of Žilina
Published online: 8 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18031.ham
Abstract
The paper focuses on metaphors based on the image schemas of container and force that were employed by U.S. President Barack Obama in the campaign against ISIL (The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant). Systematic metaphors based on the schemas of container and force illustrate the strategy of the international alliance against ISIL’s activity. The strategy included the isolation of the organization, the restriction of the flow of foreign fighters and financial resources to the area controlled by ISIL as well as planning military operations designed to weaken the influence of the organization. The analysis has been conducted on the corpus of political speeches delivered by the speaker in the period from June 2014 to September 2016. Theoretical framework that is employed in the analysis of primary data is grounded in Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) which explores ideological aspects of discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The container and force schemas
  • 3.Theoretical framework for analysis
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.Findings and discussion
    • 5.1Systematic metaphors based on the container schema in Barack Obama’s discourse
      • 5.1.1the isolation of the isil’s container
      • 5.1.2money is a fluid that flows into the container
      • 5.1.3foreign fighters are a fluid that flows into the container
      • 5.1.4the central part of the container is the heart of isil
    • 5.2Systematic metaphors based on the force schema in Barack Obama’s discourse
      • 5.2.1squeezing/ tightening the isil’s container is attacking
      • 5.2.2the machine metaphor – isil’s heart is a machine that pumps funds and propaganda outside the container
    • 5.3The combination of the container and force schemas
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (44)
References
Alejo, R. (2010). Where does the money go? An analysis of the container metaphor in economics: The market and the economy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1137–1150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–278). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Low, G., & Maslen, R. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In R. Maslen & L. Cameron (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 116–146). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, P. (2002). Explorations in political discourse: Methodological and critical perspectives. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Applying cognitive pragmatics to critical discourse studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses. Journal of Pragmatics, 701, 16–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society, 17(5), 563–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). The communication of leadership: The design of leadership style. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Analysing political speeches: rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Deixis and distance: President Clinton’s justification of intervention in Kosovo. In M. Dedaić & D. Nelson (Eds.), At war with words (pp. 95–126). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Analysing political discourse: theory and practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. In C. Schäffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and Peace (pp. 37–59). Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (2002). Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G. (2017). Textual patterning of metaphor. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 175–192). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Tendahl, M., & Okonski, L. (2011). Inferring pragmatic messages from metaphor. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 7(1), 3–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2004). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Metaphor: a practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh:The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maslen, R. (2017). Finding systematic metaphors. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 88–101). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, Z. J. (2004). CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2003). Ideological functions of metaphor: The conceptual metaphors of health and illness in public discourse. In R. Dirven, R. Frank & M. Pütz (Eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought (pp. 327–352). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). The heart of the European body politic: British and German perspectives on Europe’s central organ. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(5–6), 437–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3 (1), 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016a). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). What can metaphor theory contribute to the study of political discourse? In M. Degani, P. Frassi & M. I. Lorenzetti (Eds.), The Languages of politics/La politique et ses langages Volume 1 (pp. 9–28). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a). Metaphor and persuasion in politics. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 309–322). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 1091, 95–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niemeier, S. (2000). Straight from the heart – metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 195–213). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peña, M. S. (2008). Dependency systems for image-schematic patterns in a usage-based approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6), 1041–1066. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1), pp. 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, A. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). The Islamic state’s information warfare. Measuring the success of ISIS’s online strategy. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(2), 258–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1), 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jovanović, Vladimir Ž., Marta Veličković & Biljana Mišić Ilić
2025. Image-schematic complexes in political discourse conceptualizations. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 12:2 ► pp. 264 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yang
2024. The fight metaphor in translation: From patriotism to pragmatism. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue