Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.155–176

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Resources not rulebooks

Metaphors for grammar in teachers’ metalinguistic discourse

 | Brunel University London
Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18022.cus
Abstract
This paper explores the way that teachers use metaphors to think and talk about grammar and what this means for classroom practice. It does so by employing conceptual metaphor theory to analyse teachers’ metalinguistic discourse, focusing particularly on construals of grammar and grammar teaching. Based on a series of interviews with 24 UK-based secondary school English teachers, the findings suggest that teachers make extensive use of metaphor, often mapping the abstract domain of grammar with concrete domains such as construction material and rulebook. The discipline of English studies itself was often construed as a series of separate parts, with grammar occupying a physical space that was often seen as disconnected to other aspects of the curriculum. The findings are discussed in relation to sociocultural contexts, including the current climate of English teaching in the UK, educational policy discourse, public and professional views on language, and the place of grammar on the curriculum.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor in metalinguistic discourse
  • 3.Conceptualisations of grammar in schools
  • 4.Interview design
  • 5.Analysis method
  • 6.Metaphor in the interview data
    • 6.1The grammar target domain
      • 6.1.1 rulebook
      • 6.1.2Breaking rules
      • 6.1.3 physical structure
    • 6.2Grammar and the curriculum
  • 7.Reflection and discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Aarts, B. (2011). Oxford modern English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, J. (2015). Metaphor, simile and the exaggeration of likeness. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(1), 41–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. Metaphorik.de, 201, 39–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bermel, N. (2007). Linguistic authority, language ideology, and metaphor: The Czech orthography wars. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, J., & Shortis, T. (2010). Who’s prepared to teach school English? The degree level qualifications and preparedness of initial teacher trainees in English. London: Committee for Linguistics in Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Board of Education. (1921). The teaching of English in England (The Newbolt report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cajkler, W., & Hislam, J. (2002). Trainee teachers’ grammatical knowledge: The tension between public expectations and individual competence. Language Awareness, 11(3), 161–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008a). Metaphor and talk. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach. Pragmatics & Beyond (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cushing, I. (2018). Language change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2011). Independent review of key stage 2 testing, assessment and accountability (The Bew report). London: DfE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). National curriculum in England: English programmes of study. London: DfE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giovanelli, M. (2015). Becoming an English language teacher: Linguistic knowledge, anxieties and the shifting sense of identity. Language and Education, 29(5), 416–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The value of linguistics to the teacher. In M. Giovanelli & D. Clayton, (Eds.), Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary English classroom (pp. 13–24). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (2016). The impact of policy on language teaching in UK schools. In M. Giovanelli & D. Clayton (Eds.), Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary English classroom (pp. 25–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, R. & Walmsley, J. (2005). The English patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Journal of Linguistics, 43(3), 593–622. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2017). Metaphor use in educational contexts. In E. Semino & S. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 283–295). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locke, T. (2010) (Ed.). Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marshall, B. (2017). The politics of testing. English in Education 51(1), 27–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: the impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 139–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saraceni, M. (2015). World Englishes: A critical analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snell, J. (2013). Dialect, interaction and class positioning in school: From deficit to difference to repertoire. Language and Education, 27(2), 110–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2008). When is metaphor deliberate? In G. Steen. (Ed.) Selected papers from the Stockholm Metaphor Festival (pp. 43–63). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Three kinds of metaphor in discourse: A linguistic taxonomy. In A. Musolff, & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 25–39). London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 179–197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 901, 67–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, A. (2015). Conceptualisations of ‘grammar teaching’: L1 English teachers’ beliefs about teaching grammar for writing. Language Awareness, 24(1), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Healey, Brett
2025. Improving narrative writing by teaching the linguistics of imagination. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 48:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Healey, Brett
2025. ‘Let me see it through your eyes’: Teaching grammar‐for‐writing as imaginative embodiment. Literacy 59:2 ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Walshe, Karen & Geoffrey Teece
2025. On Understanding ‘Understanding’ in Religious Education. In Religion, Learning, Literacy, ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Guoqiang, Wan Farah Wani Wan Fakhruddin & Tianli Zhou
2024. Functional stylistic studies to pedagogic discourse: a systematic review of literature. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 42:4 ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Mason, Jessica
2022. Teachers’ Intertextual Identities and English Education. In Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Cushing, Ian
2020. Prescriptivism, linguicism and pedagogical coercion in primary school UK curriculum policy. English Teaching: Practice & Critique 19:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Cushing, Ian
2020. The policy and policing of language in schools. Language in Society 49:3 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Slowing Metaphor Down [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 26], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue