Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.22–44

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Seasonal metaphors in Arab journalistic discourse

 | King Abdulaziz University
Published online: 1 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18020.cha
Abstract
The rhetorical fabric of the recent Arab uprisings resorts to mythology and metaphoricity to elicit an ideologically-biased polarization of the popular revolts. Building on some striking resemblances the Greek myth of Persephone and the journalistic construction of the Arab revolts hold in common, this paper delves into the oblique parallelism that informs the use of seasonal metaphors to serve ideological functions. The analysis of this pragmatic aspect of metaphorical structuring elaborates on findings of a corpus study, focusing on the collocational tendencies of the Arab Spring and Arab Autumn metaphors in Tunisian and Saudi press outlets. Empirical results show that the anti-revolts agenda selects negatively valued collocates to occur with the Arab Autumn metaphor, whereas the pro-revolts ideology recruits positively-valued lexis to mirror the emancipatory journey voiced by the Arab Spring trope. The paper uses a blend of cognitive theories of metaphor with research from a critical metaphor perspective to elucidate the ideologies which motivate and guide the figurative construal of the popular uprisings in Arab journalistic discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Figurative construal of the Arab uprisings
    • 2.1Genesis of seasonal metaphors
    • 2.2The ideological function of metaphor
    • 2.3Mythological embedding
      • 2.3.1Synopsis of the myth
      • 2.3.2The rape narrative
      • 2.3.3The forbidden love narrative
  • 3.A collocational analysis of seasonal metaphors in the Arab press
    • 3.1Semantic prosody
    • 3.2Methodology
    • 3.3Results
    • 3.4Semantic priming and figurative framing
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Ahmed, K. (2011). Affective computing and sentiment analysis: Emotion, metaphor and terminology. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., & Leech, G. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, W. (1996). Semantic prosody and cohesive company. Leuvense Bijdragen, 851, 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: cold war discourse form containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Church, K. W., Gale, W., Hanks, P. & Hindle, D. (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical acquisition: Exploiting on-line resources to build a lexicon (pp. 115–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cisneros, J. D. (2008). Contaminated communities: The metaphor of “immigrant as Pollutant” in media representations of immigration. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 11(4), 569–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P. (1991). Multiword units in newspaper language. In S. Granger (Ed.), Perspectives on the English lexicon: A tribute to Jacques Van Roey. Louvain-la-Neuve: Cahiers de I’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). The evaluative properties of metaphors. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (2004). Pragmatics and cognitive linguistics. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & M. Turner. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the Mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C., Geyken, A., Herold, A., Koerner, F., & Neumann, G. (2006). Corpus-based studies of German idioms and light verbs. International Journal of Lexicography, 19(4), 349–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, H. (1994). The Homeric Hymn to Demeter: Translation, commentary, and interpretive essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative framing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwell, D. (2004). The Sketch Engine. Information Technology, 1051.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1992). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify the war in the Gulf. Journal of Urban and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 59–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Backer, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinez, A. S. (2008). Collocation analysis of a sample corpus using some statistical measures: An empirical approach. Murcia: Escuela Oficial de Idiomas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Möller, N. (2014). Cognitive metaphor and the “Arab Spring”. In F. Polzenhagen, Z. Kövecses, S. Vogelbacher & S. Kleinke (Eds.), Cognitive explorations into metaphor and metonymy (pp. 133–148). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2012). Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 131–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núňez, A., Gerloff, M., Do Dinh, E., Rapp, A., Gehring, P., & Gurevych, I. (2017). A wind of change: Shaping public opinion of the Arab Spring using metaphors. Digital Humanities 2017 conference, McGill University, Montreal 8–11 August 2017.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rychlý, P. (2008). A lexicographer-friendly association score. In A. Horák, P. Rychlý, & A. Rambousek (Eds.), Proceedings of the second workshop on recent advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing (pp. 6–9). Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., Jones, S., & Daley, R. (2004). English collocation studies: The OSTI report. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1995). Corpus evidence for norms of lexical collocation. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torlakova, L. (2014). Metaphors of the Arab Spring: Figurative construals of the uprisings and revolutions. Journal of Arabic and Islamic studies, 141, 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, R., McEnery, T., & Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Deignan, Alice
2025. Metaphor. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Juszczyk, Konrad, Barbara Konat & Małgorzata Fabiszak
2022. Speakers who metaphorize together – argue together. Metaphor and the Social World 12:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue