Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.242–262
Reclaiming a unified American narrative
Lexical, grammatical, and story metaphors in a discussion of polarized identities
Published online: 5 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18019.rit
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.18019.rit
Abstract
As part of an on-going project to apply metaphor analysis to understanding the cultural polarization that has recently obstructed discourse about political and cultural issues in both the United States and Europe, this essay examines the lexical, grammatical, and story metaphors in a recent editorial column, by conservative columnist Ross Douthat, that also focuses on this topic. In a key section of the essay, Douthat uses a blend of complex grammatical and lexical metaphors to highlight the contrast between the traditional American identity narrative of settlement and conquest and a recently emerged liberal counter-narrative, which Douthat epitomizes by quoting former President Obama’s repeated insistence that “That’s not who we are.” Douthat’s argument is contextualized by the reproduction of an image with the title “Engraving of a massacre of Indian women and children in Idaho by 19th century white settlers,” which strengthens the contrasts and implied ironies embedded in his complex combination of grammatical and lexical metaphors. These relationships are brought into sharp focus through the metaphor-led analysis of the text and its interaction with the image, demonstrating the value of this approach to discourse analysis.
Keywords: metaphor, narrative, American national identity, cultural polarization, Trumpism
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Metaphor: Context-limited simulation theory (CLST)
- 3.Method
- 4.Data and analysis
- 4.1The accompanying image: “Enlightened Christian warfare” – or genocide?
- 4.2“Who are we?” The structure of the essay
- 4.3The core of the argument
- 4.4Grammatical metaphors and ironic contrasts
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Reconciling the polarities?
- 5.2Implications for metaphor theory and analysis
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (25)
Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. NYC: Basic Books.
Dorst, A. G., & Kaal, A. A. (2012). Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martinez, M. Sanchez-Garcia & A. M. Piquer-Piriz, (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Douthat, R. (2017). Who Are We? New York Times, Feb. 4. [URL]
(2015). For the South, against the Confederacy: On the distinctive appeal of a “backwards” region. New York Times, June 24. [URL]
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 211, 434–458.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin, & R. Veel, (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185–237). London & New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London and New York: Cassel.
Huntington, S. P. (2004). Who are we? The challenges to America’s national identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kintsch, W. (2008). How the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: A simulation based on LSA. In Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 129–142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 1041, 211–240.
Mao, F. (2010). On cognition and function of grammatical metaphor. Doctoral dissertation, Shanghai International Studies University.
Morris, Wesley. (2018). Cliff Huxtable was Bill Cosby’s sickest joke. New York Times, April 26, 2018. [URL]
(2013). Remarks by the President on climate change at Georgetown University. Retrieved from [URL]
Ritchie, L. D. (2010). “
Everybody goes down:” Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 251, 123–143.
(2012). Metaphor and stories in discourse about personal and social change. In B. Wagoner, E. Jensen, & J. Oldmeadow (Eds.), Culture and social change: Transforming society through the power of ideas (pp. 99–118). London: Information Age Publishing.
Ritchie, L. D., Feliciano, A., & Sparks, A. (2018). Rhetorical confinement, contrasting metaphors, and cultural polarities: “Yes we can” meets “Carnage in the cities.” Metaphor and the Social World, 8(2), 247–266.
Ritchie, L. D., & Thomas, M. (2015). A “glowing marble“: “brushed with clouds” or “parched, scorched, and washed away“? Obama’s use of contrasting metaphors and stories in framing climate change. Metaphor and the Social World, 51, 1–19.
Ritchie, L. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). “Nixon stonewalled the investigation”: Potential contributions of grammatical metaphor to conceptual metaphor theory and analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 301, 118–136.
Smith, G. (2019). Cattle, progress, and a victimized nation: Exploring metaphors in current and past immigration discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 9(2).
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
O'Dowd, Niamh A., Lorraine Adriano & Jeannette Littlemore
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.