Review published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 8:1 (2018) ► pp.143–149
Book review
Degani, M. (2015). Framing the rhetoric of a leader: An analysis of Obama’s election campaign speeches
Reviewed by
Published online: 7 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17026.rei
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17026.rei
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Part 1: Introduction to the topic
- 3.Part 2: Framing the rhetoric of a leader
- 4.General evaluation
References
References (12)
Ahrens, K. (2011). Examining conceptual metaphor models through lexical frequency patterns: A case study of U.S. presidential speeches. In S. Handl & H. J. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 167–184). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ahrens, K., & Yat Mei Lee, S. (2009). Gender versus politics: When conceptual models collide in the US Senate. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 62–82). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cienki, A. (2004). Bush’s and Gore’s language and gestures in the 2000 US presidential debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 31, 409–440.
(2005a). Metaphor in the “Strict Father” and “Nurturant Parent” cognitive models: Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), 279–312.
(2005b). The metaphorical use of family terms versus other nouns in political debates. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 27–39.
Deason, G., & Gonzales, M. H. (2012). Moral politics in the 2008 presidential convention acceptance speeches. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 254–268.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. How liberals and conservative think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Moses, J. F., & Gonzales, M. H. (2015). Strong candidate, nurturant candidate: Moral language in presidential television advertisements. Political Psychology, 36(4), 379–397.
Ohl, J. J., Pfister, D. S., Nader, M., & Griffin, D. (2013). Lakoff’s theory of moral reasoning in presidential campaign advertisements, 1952–2012. Communication Studies, 64(5), 488–507. .
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.