Cover not available

Review published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 8:1 (2018) ► pp.150156

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (19)
References
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. Theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1995). Metaphor in the “Strict Father” and “Nurturant Parent” cognitive models. Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 161, 279–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Does deliberate metaphor have a future? Journal of Pragmatics 901, 73–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. How Liberals and Conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate – the essential guide for Progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(1), 23–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The metaphor of the “body politic” across languages and cultures. In F. Polzenhagen, Z. Kövecses, S. Vogelbacher & S. Kleinke (Eds.), Cognitive explorations into metaphor and metonymy (pp. 87–99). Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016a). Metaphor scenario analysis as part of cultural linguistics. Tekst i Dyskurs – Text und Diskurs, 91, 47–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). How metaphors can shape political reality. The figurative scenarios at the heart of Brexit. PiLaCS Papers in Language and Communication Studies, 1(1), 2–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2010). When is metaphor deliberate? In N. -L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival (pp. 43–63). Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 901, 67–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Mayer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 63–94). London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue