Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 9:1 (2019) ► pp.32–58

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Gesturing the source domain

The role of co-speech gesture in the metaphorical models of gender transition

 | San Francisco State University
Published online: 20 May 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17016.led
Abstract
Gesture is aptly described as a “backdoor” to cognition (Sweetser, E. (2007). Looking at space to study mental spaces. Co-speech gesture as a crucial data source in Cognitive Linguistics. Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 181, 201–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, p. 203). Co-speech gesture has been shown to aid in the representation of abstract concepts (Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4(2). 197–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) and, specifically, encode metaphorical source domains (Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). This paper examines how co-speech gesture aligns with spoken and written narrative to support a spatially based representation of gender identity. Repeated gestural patterns include inward facing palms used to mime fictive category boundaries, gestural mapping of motion across metaphorical gender regions, manual deictic reference to interior and exterior self, and distancing from past gender assignment signaled through emblematic scare quotes. The data examined in this paper confirm the important role gesture plays in supplementing the instantiation of the metaphorical models that organize transgender speakers’ experience with and discussion of gender and transition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The coming-out story as a narrative genre
    • 1.2Metaphorical gesture
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Binary categories
    • 3.2 transition is a journey
    • 3.3The self divided
    • 3.4Gender as a contested category – the use of scare quotes
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Multifunctionality
    • 4.2Category order
    • 4.3Gesture and gender identity
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (50)
References
Armitage, L. K. (2008). Transsexualism and transgender: The social construction of an essentialist identity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett, R. (1998). Markedness and style switching in performances by African American drag queens. In C. Myers-Scotton (Ed.), Codes and consequences: Choosing linguistic varieties (pp. 139–161). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Indexing polyphonous identity in the speech of African American drag queens. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang & L. Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 313–331). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briton, N., & Hall, J. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32(1), 79–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (1999). “Why be normal?” Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society, 281, 203–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (1995). Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D.. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K. (2012). The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4), 643–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008–). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. Available online at [URL]
Davies, S., & Goldberg, J. M. (2006). Clinical aspects of transgender speech feminization and masculinization. International Journal of Transgenderism, 9(3–4), 167–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dodge, E., Hong, J., & Stickles, E. (2015). Deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis. Paper presented at The Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (June 5). Denver, CO.
Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race, and culture [Reissue of Efron, 1941]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frances, S. (1979). Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Sex Roles, 5(4), 519–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1595–1614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancock, A. B., & Garabedian, L. M. (2013). Transgender voice and communication treatment: A retrospective chart review of 25 cases. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 481, 54–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenagy, G. (2005). Transgender health: Findings from two needs assessment studies in Philadelphia. Health & Social Work, 30(1), 19–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality? In D. NcNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 47–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kok, K., Bergmann, K., Cienki, A., & Kopp, S. (2016). Mapping out the multifunctionality of speakers’ gestures. Gesture, 15(1), 37–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Sorry, I’m Not Myself Today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser, (Eds.), Space worlds and grammar, (pp. 91–123). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Wehling, E. (2012). The little blue book: The essential guide to thinking and talking Democratic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lederer, J. (2015). Exploring the metaphorical models of transgenderism. Metaphor & Symbol, 30(2), 95–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi, E., Wilchins, R. A., Priesing, D., & Malouf, D. (2002). Gender violence: Transgender experiences with violence and discrimination. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(1), 89–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. (2000). Growth points in thinking for speaking. In D. NcNeill, (Ed.) Language and gesture, (pp. 141–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, (pp. 335–358). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skomroch, H., Petermann, K., Helmich, I., Dvoretska, D., Rein, R., Kim, Z. H., Sassenberg, U., & Lausberg, H. (2013, June). “Gender Differences in Hand Movement Behavior.” Paper presented at TiGeR 2013 Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Sternberg, M. (2003a). Universals of narrative and their cognitivist fortunes (I). Poetics Today, 241, 297–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003b). Universals of narrative and their cognitivist fortunes (II). Poetics Today, 241, 517–638. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stotzer, R. (2009). Violence against transgender people: A review of United States data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 170–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taub, S. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimman, L. (2009). ‘The other kind of coming-out’: Transgender people and the coming out narrative genre. Gender and Language, 3(1). 53–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Transmasculinity and the voice: Diverse masculinities through phonetic bricolage. In T. Milani (Ed.), Language and masculinities, (pp. 197–219). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Agency and the gendered voice: Metalinguistic rejections of vocal masculinization among female-to-male transgender speakers. In A. Babel (Ed.), Sociolinguistic awareness and control (pp. 253–277). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Trans self-identification and the language of neoliberal selfhood: Agency, power, and the limits of monologic discourse. Special Issue: Transgender and language Issue. Editors: E. Di Martino and L. von Flotow. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(2561), pp. 147–175. Retrieved 26 Mar. 2019, from Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Heritage, Frazer
2025. Social identity and implicature: Exploring the pragmatics of transgender coming out narratives in videogames. Journal of Pragmatics 246 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2022. A multilevel cognitive model of coming out. Prace Językoznawcze 24:4 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2022. Do we need Queer Cognitive Linguistics?. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :16 (2022) ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2023. Levels of metaphor in gesture. Pragmatics & Cognition 30:2 ► pp. 330 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2023. Metaphors of coming out in Polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2025. Secrets in motion. Narrative Inquiry DOI logo
MAZZUCA, CLAUDIA, ASIFA MAJID, LUISA LUGLI, ROBERTO NICOLETTI & ANNA M. BORGHI
2020. Gender is a multifaceted concept: evidence that specific life experiences differentially shape the concept of gender. Language and Cognition 12:4 ► pp. 649 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue