Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 8:1 (2018) ► pp.81–99

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Metaphor-enriched social cognition and spatial bias in the courtroom

 | University of Birmingham
 | University of California, Merced
 | University of California, Merced
Published online: 7 May 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.17001.win
Abstract
It is known that courtroom decisions can be influenced by subtle psychological biases, such as asking leading questions. Informed by metaphor research on the connection between spatial proximity and intimacy (e.g., ‘we are close’, ‘their views are far apart’), this paper reports four experiments that look at the potential role of psychological biases arising from the spatial layout of a courtroom. In particular, we ask the question: Does being close or far to a defendant influence one’s reasoning about who is likely to win or lose a court case? Working with an American (jury-based) legal system as an example, our experiments manipulated the physical distance between the jury box and the defendant’s table as shown on images of a courtroom. Across several manipulations, we discovered that participants judged the defendant to be more likely to win when the defendant’s table was located close to the jury box. These studies are in line with the research on ‘metaphor-enriched social cognition’, showing that the way we talk about relationships in terms of space corresponds to social reasoning in a spatial world.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Method
    • 2.2Analysis
    • 2.3Results
    • 2.4Discussion and replication
  • 4.Experiment 2
    • 4.1Method
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Experiments 3A and 3B
    • 5.1Method
    • 5.2Results
    • 5.3Discussion
  • 6.Experiments 4A and 4B
    • 6.1Method
    • 6.2Results
    • 6.3Discussion
  • 7.General discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 651, 1005–1027. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, R. L., Foushee, H. C., Davis, M. H., & Aderman, D. (1979). Emotional empathy in a courtroom simulation: A person‐situation interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 91, 275–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 291, 819–833. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Noveck, B. (2006). Courtroom applications of virtual environments, immersive virtual environments, and collaborative virtual environments. Law & Policy, 281, 249–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bishop, B. (2008). The big sort: Why clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohannon, J. (2011). Social science for pennies. Science, 3341, 307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1381, 351–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2011). When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 221, 419–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, D. L., & Peterson, J. L. (1981). Bias in the courtroom: Race and sex effects of attorneys on juror verdicts. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 91, 81–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 81, 267–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1595–1614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension: An anthropologist examines man’s use of space in public and in private. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horowitz, I. A., Kerr, N. L., Park, E. S., & Gockel, C. (2006). Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: Emotional bias and juror nullification. Law and Human Behavior, 301, 163–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, H., Schnall, S., Do-Joon, Y., & White, M. P. (2013). Social distance decrease responders’ sensitivity to fairness in the ultimatum game. Judgment and Decision Making, 81, 632–638.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 1361, 1045–1067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 131, 585–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T., Sparks, D., Matthews, J. L., Hunter, J., & Huette, S. (2012). Smashing new results on aspectual framing: How people describe car accidents. Studies in Language, 361, 700–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, J. L., & Matlock, T. (2010). The spatial and temporal underpinnings of social distance. In C. Holscher (Ed.), Spatial Cognition VII (pp. 19–31). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Social Psychology, 421, 185–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCall, C., Bunyan, D. P., Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., & Beall, A. C. (2009). Leveraging collaborative virtual environment technology for inter-population research on persuasion in a classroom setting. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 181, 361–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulcahy, L. (2010). Legal architecture: Justice, due process and the place of law. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, G. L. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 601, 173–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition, 621, 99–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 121, 237–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pashler, H., Coburn, N., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Priming of social distance? Failure to replicate effects on social and food judgments. PloS One, 71, e42510. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from [URL].
Schielzeth, H. (2010). Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 103–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shepard, S. (2005). Should the criminal defendant be assigned a seat in court. Yale Law Journal, 1151, 2203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherrill, A. M., Eerland, A., Zwaan, R. A., & Magliano, J. P. (2015). Understanding how grammatical aspect influences legal judgment. PloS One, 101, e0141181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 71, 201–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tatler, B. W. (2007). The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision, 71, 4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 560–589.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (2000). Some ways that maps and diagrams communicate. In C. Freska, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition II: Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications (pp. 72–79). New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 499–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 851, 482–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 721, 1034–1046. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 191, 302–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B., & Matlock, T. (2013). Making judgments based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor & Symbol, 28(4), 219–232.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Primary metaphors are both cultural and embodied. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse. (pp. 99–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Muir, Bethany R., Eryn J. Newman & Meredith Rossner
2025. The role of video background cues in the virtual court: a psychological perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law 31:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Shakoury, Kayvan & Frank Boers
2024. Metaphors for multiculturalism in the Canadian context. Metaphor and the Social World 14:2 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Aidonojie, P. A., S. A. Wakili & D. Ayuba
2023. Effectiveness of the Administration of Justice in Nigeria Under the Development of Digital Technologies. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law 1:4 ► pp. 1105 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo, Sarah E. Duffy & Jeannette Littlemore
2020. Power, Gender, and Individual Differences in Spatial Metaphor: The Role of Perceptual Stereotypes and Language Statistics. Metaphor and Symbol 35:3 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue