Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp.157–183
From the light of truth to the dark alleys of tyranny
The evocative power of metaphor in American political speeches
Published online: 23 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.16025.deg
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.16025.deg
Abstract
The present study aims at exploring the evocative power of metaphor in a number of remarkable American political speeches. The investigation concentrates on the metaphorical framing of political issues in terms of light and darkness. The analysis is carried out on a corpus consisting of the top 100 political speeches in the twentieth century according to a ranking given by American rhetoricians in a national survey (http://www. news.wisc.edu/misc/speeches). Overall, the study shows how the metaphorical uses of the evocative concepts of light and darkness have facilitated the communication of central political ideas, values and beliefs in twentieth century American political rhetoric.
Article outline
- 1.Metaphor in political discourse
- 2.Light and dark metaphors
- 3.Corpus and methodology
- 4.Quantitative and qualitative analysis
- 4.1Descriptive and numerical results
- 4.2Uses and functions of light and dark metaphors in CAPS
- 4.2.1Metaphors sustaining core cultural values and beliefs
- achievement, progress, victory
- individualism, freedom
- The American Dream (opportunity, prosperity, hope)
- Counter-values (lack of hope, lack of freedom, poverty)
- Final comments
- 4.2.2Metaphors projecting a positive image of the nation
- 4.2.3Metaphors highlighting the nature of man as a rational being
- 4.2.4Metaphors projecting evaluations of human states and conditions
- 4.2.1Metaphors sustaining core cultural values and beliefs
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (25)
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2011). Politician and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, P. A. (1996). Security metaphors. Cold War discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.
Cockcroft, R., & Cockcroft, S. (2014). Persuading people. An introduction to rhetoric (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Degani, M. (2015). Framing the rhetoric of a leader. An analysis of Obama’s election campaign speeches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Friedenberg, R. V. (2002). Notable speeches in contemporary presidential campaigns. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Howe, N. (1988). Metaphor in American contemporary political discourse. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 31, 87–104.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(2004). Don’t think of an elephant. Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Miller, E. F. (1979). Metaphor and political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 73(1), 155–170.
Musolff, A. (2009). Metaphor in the history of ideas and discourses: How can we interpret a medieval version of the body-state analogy? In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 233–247). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Osborn, M. (1967). Archetypal metaphor in rhetoric: The light‐dark family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53(2), 115–126.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). A practical and flexible method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 221, 1–39.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Shakoury, Kayvan & Frank Boers
2024. Metaphors for multiculturalism in the Canadian context. Metaphor and the Social World 14:2 ► pp. 304 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
