Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 1:1 (2011) ► pp.26–52
Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate?
A question of human consciousness and action
Published online: 22 July 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
Some metaphor scholars have proposed that certain notable metaphorical expressions in speech and writing may have been deliberately composed, and quite consciously employed for their special rhetorical purposes. Deliberate metaphors are different from conventional ones, which are typically produced automatically and thoughtlessly, something that speakers and listeners, authors and readers, tacitly recognize when they engage in metaphoric discourse. This article explores some of these common assumptions about deliberate metaphor in light of contemporary research in cognitive science on meaning, consciousness and human action. My claim is that deliberate metaphors, contrary to the popular view, may not be as ‘deliberate’ in their creation and use as is traditionally believed, and therefore are not essentially different from other forms of metaphoric language. Moreover, engaging in deliberative thought processes is often exactly the wrong way to create novel, apt verbal metaphors.
Cited by (75)
Cited by 75 other publications
Cotter Salvado, João & Donal Crilly
Horst, Dorothea
2025. Re-thinking embodiment in figuration. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 40 ff.
Mars, Matthew M.
Cheng, Kaiwen, Yu Chen, Hongmei Yan & Ling Wang
Gao, Yang & Deliang Wang
2024. Review of Steen (2023): Slowing metaphor down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Functions of Language 31:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Dienstbach, Dalby
Julich-Warpakowski, Nina & Paula Pérez Sobrino
Negrea-Busuioc, Elena
Siman, Josie Helen & Thiago Oliveira da Motta Sampaio
Wang, Juanjuan, Jiajun Du, Ting Zheng & Yi Sun
Ervas, Francesca, Pietro Salis, Cristina Sechi & Rachele Fanari
Hampe, Beate
2022. Between embodiment and usage. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 157 ff.
Muelas-Gil, María
2022. Review of Di Biase-Dyson & Egg (2020): Drawing Attention to Metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 12:2 ► pp. 340 ff.
Zibin, Aseel
Dobrovol’skij, Dmitrij
Karapetjana, Indra & Gunta Roziņa
Keating, John
Lancaster, Mason D.
Lemghari, El Mustapha
Lemghari, El Mustapha
Li, Ke & Huichao Zhu
2021. Power and gender. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:2 ► pp. 238 ff.
Salis, Pietro & Francesca Ervas
Vereza, Solange
2021. The fabric of metaphor in discourse. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 339 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2020. A multimodal perspective on MCA. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 63 ff.
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla
2020. A typological framework of attention-drawing strategies for Ancient Egyptian
metaphorical language. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 39 ff.
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla & Markus Egg
2020. Drawing attention to metaphor. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 1 ff.
Horn, Fabian
2020. “Entering the house of Hades”. In Drawing attention to metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 159 ff.
Milică, Ioan
Beger, Anke
Cibulskienė, Jurga
Cotton, Matthew, Ralf Barkemeyer, Barbara Gabriella Renzi & Giulio Napolitano
Heyvaert, Pauline
2019. Fairies, Christmas miracles and sham marriages. In Variation in political metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 35 ff.
Dewandre*
, Nicole & Orsolya Gulyás
2018. Sensitive economic personae and functional human beings. Journal of Language and Politics 17:6 ► pp. 831 ff.
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
Šeškauskienė, Inesa
2018. Musolff, A. (2016).Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 150 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Chapter 6. If-clauses and their figurative basis. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 152 ff.
Dewandre, Nicole G. & Orsolya Gulyas
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Elaine Chen
Tay, Dennis
2016. A variational approach to deliberate metaphors. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2 ► pp. 277 ff.
Thonus, Terese & Beth L. Hewett
El Refaie, Elisabeth
2015. Cross-modal resonances in creative multimodal metaphors. In Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 78], ► pp. 13 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette
2015. Metaphor in specialist discourse. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 299 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2016. Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World 6:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
2020.
Metaphor production and metaphor interpretation. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 85 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Negrea-Busuioc, Elena & L. David Ritchie
Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps
Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps
2015. Special issue on the political impact of metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 5:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps
Schoor, Carola
2015. Political metaphor, a matter of purposeful style. Metaphor and the Social World 5:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
Steen, Gerard
Steen, Gerard
Littlemore, Jeannette, Tina Krennmayr, James Turner & Sarah Turner
Ritchie, L. David & Elena Negrea-Busuioc
Benczes, Réka
Caballero, Rosario
Horton, William S.
Ng, Carl Jon Way & Veronika Koller
Semino, Elena, Alice Deignan & Jeannette Littlemore
Barnden, John A.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
