I. Šeškauskienė (ed.). Metaphor in Legal Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022. 244 pp. ISBN 1-5275-7849-6 / 978-1-5275-7849-4

Reviewed by

Francesca L. Seracini | Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan

Published online: 10 October 2023

https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00038.ser

References (7)

References

Anthony, L. (2015). AntConc (Version 3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from [URL]

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Macmillan-Palgrave.

Marín Pérez, M. J., & Rea Rizzo, C. (2012). Structure and design of the British Law Report Corpus (BLRC): a legal corpus of judicial decisions from the UK. Journal of English Studies, 101, 131–145.

Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A Method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1). 1–39.

Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins Publishing.

Stefanowitsch, A. (2007). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries. (Eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, (pp. 63–105). De Gruyter Mouton.

Wojtczak, S. & Witczak-Plisiecka, I. (2019). Metaphors and Legal Language: a Few Comments on Ordinary, Specialised and Legal Meaning. Research in Language, 17 (3), 273–295.

I. Šeškauskienė (ed.). Metaphor in Legal Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022. 244 pp. ISBN 1-5275-7849-6 / 978-1-5275-7849-4

I. Šeškauskienė (ed.). Metaphor in Legal Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022. 244 pp. ISBN 1-5275-7849-6 / 978-1-5275-7849-4