Cover not available

Review published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.323–330

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Book review

C. Rasse. Poetic Metaphors: Creativity and Interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2022. 190 pp. ISBN 9789027211118 HB 9789027257734 EB

Reviewed by
 | Minsk State Linguistic University
Published online: 5 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00037.rev
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Overview
  • 3.Evaluation
  • References
References (29)
References
Ahrens, K. (2010). Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors. In A. Deignan, G. Low & Z. Todd. (Eds.). Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 185–207). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandt, P. A. (2021). A propos de sémiotique, de mathématiques, de poésie et de musique : Entretien avec Kęstutis Nastopka. Acta Semiotica, 21, 21–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crisp, P. (2008). Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough? Language and Literature, 17(4), 291–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duchatelez, S. (2019). La communication poétique. Vers une approche linguistique de l’effet poétique. Thèse de doctorat. Université de Toulon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasciolo, M. (2016). Des métaphores de la vie quotidienne à l’ontologie de la vie quotidienne. Langue Française, 189(1), 49–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasciolo, M. & Rossi, M. (2016). Métaphore et métaphores : les multiples issues de l’interaction conceptuelle. Langue Française, 189(1), 5–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeman, M. H. (2000). Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. In A. Barcelona. (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective (pp. 253–281). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Cognitive Mapping in Literary Analysis. Style, 36(3), 466–483.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J. (2020). Poetry in the mind: The cognition of contemporary poetic style. Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1968). Introduction. In P. Fontanier (Éd.). Les Figures du discours (pp. 5–17). Flammarion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Nascimento, S. (1996). How we talk when we talk about love: metaphorical concepts and understanding love poetry. In R. Kreuz & M. MacNealy. (Eds). Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp.221–240). Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2002). Identifying and appreciating poetic metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31(2), 101–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Boers, E. (2005). Metaphoric processing of allegorical poetry. In Z. Maalej. (Ed.). Metaphor and culture (pp. 44–61). University of Manouba Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphor in human life. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. & Okonski, L. (2018). Cognitive poetics of allegorical experience. In S. Csabi. (Ed.). Expressive minds and artistic creations: Studies in cognitive poetics (pp. 33–55). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. (2012). Du sens I. Essais sémiotiques. Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2019). Metaphor universals in literature. Argumentum, 151, 264–276.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasse, C. (2018). A cognitive-linguistic approach to the study of metaphors in James Arthur’s poem “Wind”. Moderne Sprachen, 62(2), 189–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasse, C., Onysko, A. & Citron, F. (2020). Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: A psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition, 12(2), 310–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. (2nd Edition). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1970). Synecdoques. In T. Todorov et al. (Éds). Sémantique de la poésie (pp. 7–26). Éditions du Seuil. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsur, R. (2008). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics (2nd, expanded and updated ed.). Sussex Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue