Cover not available

Review published In: Current challenges in metaphor research
Edited by Nina Julich-Warpakowski and Paula Pérez-Sobrino
[Metaphor and the Social World 13:1] 2023
► pp. 120127

References (27)
References
Blomberg, J. & Zlatev, J. (2015). Non-actual motion: Phenomenological analysis and linguistic evidence. Cognitive Processing, 16(1), 153–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119(3), 149–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C. E., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2012). From novel to familiar: tuning the brain for metaphors. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3212–3221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehay, E. K., & Landwehr, J. R. (2019). A MAP for effective advertising: The metaphoric advertising processing model. AMS Review, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Mano, Q. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2376–2386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esbrí-Blasco, M. (2020). “Cooking in the mind”: a frame-based contrastive study of culinary metaphors in American English and Peninsular Spanish. (Doctoral Dissertation). Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.
Gkiouzepas, L., & Hogg, M. K. (2011). Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising a structural, conceptual, and pragmatic investigation. Journal of Advertising, 40(1).103–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. H., & Spivey, M. (2014). Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Universality and variation in the use of metaphor. In N.-L. Johannesson & D. C. Minugh (eds), Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals. Stockholm University: Stockholm, 51–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 21(4), 663–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2019). Metaphors in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., & Houghton, D. (2018). The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 957–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejazz Group. (2007). MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse, Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). High-level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behaviour. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2017). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition, and discourse (pp. 138–159). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samur, D., Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M. (2015). Emotional context modulates embodied metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 781, 108–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šorm, E., & Steen, G. (2018). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor Identification. In Steen, G. (Ed.), Visual metaphor: structure and process (pp. 47–88) John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Mulken, M., Le Pair, R., & Forceville, C. (2010). The impact of perceived complexity, deviation and comprehension on the appreciation of visual metaphor in advertising across three European countries. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12):3418–3430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor from Body and Culture. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue