Cover not available

Article published In: Current challenges in metaphor research
Edited by Nina Julich-Warpakowski and Paula Pérez-Sobrino
[Metaphor and the Social World 13:1] 2023
► pp. 16–36

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Zooming in on the notion of metaphoricity

Notions, dimensions, and operationalizations

 | University of Erfurt
 | University of Southern Denmark
Published online: 7 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00027.jul
Abstract
The present contribution addresses the notion of metaphoricity and discusses different positions in relation to this complex and multi-dimensional phenomenon. Generally, the notion of metaphoricity is used when metaphor is not considered a binary category anymore, or when the status of an expression as metaphorical is at stake (e.g. in discussions of metaphor identification). We will focus on the first understanding of metaphoricity as a scalar phenomenon. Despite the fact that the term is used more and more in the metaphor literature, it is often unclear what it actually entails, e.g. how metaphor is gradable. To shed light on this theoretical and methodological problem, in this paper we will discuss different notions of the term metaphoricity by illustrating how metaphoricity is understood and how it can be operationalized and studied.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Notions of metaphoricity
  • 3.Dimensions of metaphoricity
    • 3.1Semantic similarity between domains involved in a metaphorical mapping
    • 3.2Conventionality
    • 3.3Noticeability and imaginability
    • 3.4Metaphoricity as a matter of use
    • 3.5Deliberateness
    • 3.6Ecology
    • 3.7Metaphorical to whom?
  • 4.Conclusion and perspectives for further research
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Beger, A. (2019). The contested notion of ‘deliberate metaphor’: What can we learn from ‘unclear’ cases in academic lectures? Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 7(1), 51–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bortfeld, H., & McGlone, M. S. (2001). The Continuum of Metaphor Processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1 & 2), 75–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 461, 904–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Ways of perceiving, moving, and thinking: Revindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 268–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis. Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cox, A. (2016). Music and Embodied Cognition. Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thinking. Indiana University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devylder, S., & Zlatev, J. (2020). Cutting and Breaking Metaphors of the Self and the Motivation and Sedimentation Model. In A. Baicchi & G. Radden (Eds.), Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (2003). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast (2nd ed., pp. 75–111). Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Counting Metaphors: What Does this Reveal about Language and Thought? Cognitive Semantics, 1(2), 155–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr., R. W. Jr. (2017). Metaphor Wars. Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (2011[1997]). The Language of Metaphors (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In G. J. Steen & R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, B. (2017). Embodiment and Discourse: Dimensions and Dynamics of Contemporary Metaphor Theory. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied Cognition and Discourse. (pp. 3–23). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, P. (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (pp. 17–35). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, T. W. (2017). Doing Metaphor: An Ecological Perspective on Metaphoricity in Discourse. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse (pp. 257–276). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, T. W., & Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in Experience: Toward a Distributed Enactive Approach to Metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, T. W., & Greve, L. (2019). Ecological cognition and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metaphor in specialist discourse. Insights and implications for metaphor studies and beyond. In J. B. Herrmann & T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in Specialist Discourse (Vol. 41, pp. 299–314). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic View. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C., & Tag, S. (2010). The Dynamics of Metaphor: Foregrounding and Activating Metaphoricity in Conversational Interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 10(6), 85–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T., & Reijnierse, W. G. (Eds.). (2019). Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world. (Vol. 221). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, S., Krennmayr, T., Dorst, A. G., & Reijnierse, W. G. (2019). What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it mostly does). In S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world (Vol. 221, pp. 41–67). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G.; Burgers, C. F.; Krennmayr, T.; Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use. Corpus Pragmatics, 21, 129–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Bolognesi, M., & Krennmayr, T. (2019). How Polysemy Affects Concreteness Ratings: The Case of Metaphor. Cognitive Science, 431, 2–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Die lebendige Metapher. Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2008). The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011a). The contemporary theory of metaphor now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2011b). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 211, 83–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Vol. 1711, pp. 63–105). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urbonaitė, J., Šeškauskienė, I., & Cibulskienė, J. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Lithuanian. In S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world (Vol. 221, pp. 159–181). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Blomberg, J. (2016). Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 39(2), 185–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jensen, Thomas Wiben
2025. Moral metaphor, metonymic causation. Metaphor and the Social World 15:2 ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
O’Dowd, Niamh A.
2025. Looking back on the metaphor-metonymy divide. Metaphor and the Social World 15:2 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Paliichuk, Elina
2023. A spiderweb of human trafficking: An empirical linguistic study. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :43(4) ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue