Cover not available

Introduction published In: Current challenges in metaphor research
Edited by Nina Julich-Warpakowski and Paula Pérez-Sobrino
[Metaphor and the Social World 13:1] 2023
► pp. 1–15

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Introduction

Current challenges in metaphor research

 | University of Erfurt
 | University of La Rioja
Published online: 7 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00026.jul
Abstract
Metaphor research has witnessed tremendous changes in how metaphor is seen and understood. Traditionally, metaphor has been viewed as a special, creative, and noticeable use of language. Lakoff and Johnson’s Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) has marked a cognitive revolution by viewing metaphor as pervasive in language as well as fundamental to thought and action. More recently, the discourse revolution has re-emphasised metaphor’s manifestations in language and its function in communication. A methodological revolution has brought forth procedures to identify and analyse metaphor in naturally occurring data (such as MIP and MIPVU). Despite these advances, in the present introduction, we identify four challenges that we believe metaphor researchers are still faced with: (1) How metaphorical are metaphors? (2) whose metaphor is it anyway? (3) metaphor research needs more diversity; and (4) how to study metaphor empirically – qualitatively or quantitatively? We conclude by presenting outlines of the contributions and specify how they address these issues.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Revolutions in metaphor research
  • 3.Current challenges in metaphor research
    • 3.1How metaphorical are metaphors?
    • 3.2Whose metaphor is it anyway?
    • 3.3Metaphor research needs more diversity
    • 3.4How to study metaphor empirically – qualitatively or quantitatively?
  • 4.Outline of the volume
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (54)
References
Bort-Mir, L. (2019). Developing, applying, and testing FILMIP. A filmic metaphor identification procedure. Universitat Jaume I. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 461, 904–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (1999a). Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999b). Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 105–132). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Metaphor in educational discourse (Vol. 31). continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Low, G. (2011). Metaphor and the Social World: Introduction to the first issue. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 1–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis. Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and Gesture. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C. J. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b). Advancing the debate on deliberate metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 67–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Counting Metaphors: What Does this Reveal about Language and Thought? Cognitive Semantics, 1(2), 155–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (2011[1997]). The Language of Metaphors (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes [Unpublished Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley]. [URL]
Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Semino, E. (2008). Using a semantic annotation tool for the analysis of metaphor in discourse. Metaphorik.de, 151, 141–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (21., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2019). Metaphors in the Mind. Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2019). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: Multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 521, 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacArthur, F. (2015). On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(1), 124–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahon, J. E. (1999). Getting your sources right What Aristotle didn’t say. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 69–80). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic View. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T., & Reijnierse, W. G. (Eds.). (2019). Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world. (Vol. 221). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, S., Krennmayr, T., Dorst, A. G., & Reijnierse, W. G. (2019). What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it mostly does). In S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr, & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages. MIPVU around the world (Vol. 221, pp. 41–67). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., & Ford, S. (2021). Unpacking Creativity: The Power of Figurative Communication in Advertising. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petruck, M. R. L. (Ed.). (2018). MetaNet. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šorm, E., & Steen, G. J. (2018). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual Metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 47–88). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (1999). From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–77). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). From linguistic to conceptual structure in five steps: Analyzing metaphor in poetry. In G. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains, and Gaps (pp. 197–226). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2005). The function of metaphor: Developing a corpus-based perspective. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(2), 161–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (Vol. 1711, pp. 1–16). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th. (Eds.). (2006). Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velasco-Sacristan, M. O., & Fuertes-Olivera, P. (2006). Olfactory and olfactory-mixed metaphors in print ads of perfume. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 217–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behaviour Research Methods, 451, 1191–1207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L. (2009). Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 359–381). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Usanmaz, Ahmet
2025. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Aile ve Toplum Algıları Üzerine Metaforik Bir İnceleme. İçtimaiyat :Aile Özel Sayısı ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue