Cover not available

Review published In: Metaphor in Education: A multilingual perspective
Edited by Katrin Ahlgren, Anne Golden and Ulrika Magnusson
[Metaphor and the Social World 11:2] 2021
► pp. 373–381

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

S. Nacey, A. G. Dorst, T. Krennmayr & W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.). Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. 330 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 0472 1 (HB) / 978 90 272 6175 5 (EB) https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/celcr​.22

Reviewed by
 | Macquarie University
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00025.bia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dictionaries
    • 2.1Dictionary types
    • 2.2Bilingual dictionaries
    • 2.3Senses
    • 2.4Word classes and word-types
  • 3.Demarcation of lexical units
    • 3.1Polywords
    • 3.2Compounds
    • 3.3Complex verb forms
    • 3.4Prepositions
    • 3.5Case markings
    • 3.6Word boundaries
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (10)
References
Badryzlova, Y., Y. Isaeva, N. Shekhtman & R. Kerimov. (2013). Annotating a Russian corpus of conceptual metaphor: A bottom-up approach. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (pp. 77–86), Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biernacka, E. (2013). A discourse dynamics investigation of metonymy in talk. (PhD thesis). The Open University, England, UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. & E. Sweetser. (2014). Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Biase-Dyson, C. (2017). Metaphor. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, [URL]
Erman, A. & H. Grapow. (1926–1963). Wörterbuch der ägyptischen Sprache, 131 Volumes. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2007). Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 2–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Manu, Hendrik Ori, Mikhael Misa & Hesni Neno
2025. The Role of Hyperbole and Metaphor in Film: Strengheting Emotional Impact, Humor, and Viewer Engagement. International Journal of Language and Literature 8:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla
2023. The semantics of a parallel reality. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue