Article published In: Metaphor in Education: A multilingual perspective
Edited by Katrin Ahlgren, Anne Golden and Ulrika Magnusson
[Metaphor and the Social World 11:2] 2021
► pp. 279–301
Second half part of the apple
Friendship metaphors in second language writing
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Stockholm University.
Published online: 12 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00019.ahl
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00019.ahl
Abstract
This article investigates the use of friendship metaphors in texts by adult second language writers, in relation
to the occurrence and function of metaphor and the writers’ discursive constructions of identity. The texts come from the final
assessment in Swedish for Immigrants (SFI), a language program in basic Swedish. The analysis confirmed the initial assumption
that the emotional and existentially loaded theme of friendship allows for the use of metaphor. The results also
showed that the experience of writers as newcomers in Sweden played out in the metaphors that were used and their contexts.
In order to categorize the found metaphors, a model was developed to show how systematic
metaphors reflect functions and values related to three thematic categories: guidance and help, belonging and
inclusion, and sharing and solidarity. For several metaphors, the metaphoricity was created through
novel and unidiomatic wording, i.e. a kind of neologism that can be considered a communication strategy.
The importance of using universal and abstract themes in language testing is emphasized, to enable second language
writers to express different facets of experience and knowledge through existential thoughts and attitudes – not only as language
learners and newcomers, but also as social agents who create and keep transnational relations through friends.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framings and previous research
- 2.1Metaphor in second language writing
- 2.2Friendship metaphors and a systematic theoretical framework
- 2.3Performed identities, positioning and agency
- 3.The SFI context
- 4.Data collection and analysis
- 5.Findings and analysis
- 5.1Functions of metaphors
- 5.2Thematic categories and systematic metaphors
- 5.2.1Guidance and help
- 5.2.2Belonging and inclusion
- 5.2.3Sharing and solidarity
- 6.Conclusive discussion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (51)
Ahlgren, K. (2014). Narrativa identiteter och levande metaforer i ett andraspråksperspektiv (Narrative identities and living metaphors from a second language perspective) (PhD
thesis). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
(2016). Teoretisk
utveckling och framtida utmaningar: Nationella prov i svenska för invandrare. Kieli, koulutus
ja yhteiskunta – Language, Education and
Society, 7(6), 1–8.
(2020). ”Un
voyage sans fin”: expressions métaphoriques et mudes linguistiques de nouveau locuteurs
suédois, Language et
société, 170(2), 209–128.
Ahlgren, K. & Rydell, M. (2020). Continuity
and change: migrants’ experiences of adult language education in Sweden. European Journal for
Research on the Education and Learning of
Adults, 11(3), 399–414.
Anthias, F. (2016). Interconnecting
boundaries of identity and belonging and hierarchy-making within transnational mobility studies: Framing
inequalities. Current Sociology
Monograph, 641, 271–190.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental
Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Birdsell, B. J. (2018). Creative
Metaphor Production in a First and Second Language and the Role of
Creativity. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
(2001). Self-making
and word-making. In J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds.), Narrative
and Identity Studies in Autobiography, Self and
Culture (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
(2008). Metaphor
in the construction of a learning environment. In E. Berendt (Ed.), Metaphors
for
Learning (pp. 159–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cameron, L. & Besser, S. (2004). Writing
in English as an Additional Language at Key Stage
2. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The
discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and
Symbol, 241, 63–89.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical
bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied
Linguistics, 11, 1–47.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking
the role of communicative competence in language in language
teaching. In E. Alcón & M. P. Safont Jord (Eds.), Intercultural
Language Use and Language
Learning (pp. 41–57). Berlin: Springer.
De Fina, A. (2015). Narrative
and identities. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The
Handbook of Narrative
Analysis (pp. 351–368). Malden, MA: John Wiley.
Deppermann, A. (2015). Positioning. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The
Handbook of Narrative
Analysis (pp. 369–387). Malden, MA: John Wiley.
Ekberg, L. (1997). Diskursiva och syntaktiska mönster i återberättelser hos invandrarbarn i
Rosengård (Discursive and syntactic patterns in immigrant children’s
recounts in Rosengård). In G. Håkansson, L. Lötmarker, L. Santesson & J. Svensson (Eds.), Svenskans
beskrivning 221. Lund: Lund University Press.
(2004) Grammatik och lexikon i svenska som andraspråk på nästan infödd nivå. In: Hyltenstam, K. & Lindberg, I. (eds.) Svenska som andraspråk i forskning, utbildning och samhälle (Swedish as a second language in research, education and society). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Ellis, R. (2002). A
metaphorical analysis of learners’ beliefs. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske & A. Rohde (eds.), An
Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honor of Henning
Wode (pp. 163–197). Triser: Wissenschaftlig Verlag.
Golden, A. (2017). Emotions
negotiated in L2 texts: A corpus study of written production by adult learners on a Norwegian
test. In A. Golden, S. Jarvis & K. Tenfjord (Eds.), Crosslinguistic
Influence and Distinctive Patterns of Language Learning Findings and Insights from a Learner
Corpus (pp.188–230). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s
Introduction to Functional
Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hasan, R. (2007). Private
pleasure, public discourse: reflections on engaging with
literature. In D. Miller & M. Turci (Eds.), Language
and Verbal Art Revisited. Linguistic Approaches to the Study of
Literature (pp. 13–40). London: Equinox.
Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity
without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL
Quarterly, 37(2), 275–301.
Hoang, H. (2019). Metaphorical
language in second language learners’ texts: Additional baggage of the writing journey? Observing
writing. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing
writing: Insights from keystroke logging and
handwriting (pp. 236–257). Leiden: Brill.
Holzberg, B., Kolbe, K., & Zaborowski, R. (2018). Figures
of crisis: The delineation of (un)deserving refugees in the German
media. Sociology, 52(3), 534–550.
Jörgensen, N. J., Karrebæk, M. S., Madsen, L. M. & Møller, J. S. (2011). Polylanguaging
in
superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 22–37.
Kövecses, Z. (1995). American
friendship and the scope of metaphor. Cognitive
Linguistics, 6(4), 315–346.
(2000). Metaphor
in Culture. Universality and Variation. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kristensson Uggla, B. (1999). Kommunikation på bristningsgränsen. En studie i Paul Ricœurs projekt (Communication on the breaking point. A study of Paul Ricœur’s
project). Stockholm: Brutus Östling.
Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric
competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL
Quarterly, 35(3), 459–491.
Littlemore, J., Krennmayer, T., Turen, J., & Turner, S. (2014). An
investigation into metaphor use at different levels of second language writing. Applied
Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144.
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative
Thinking and Foreign Language Learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
MacArthur, F. (2010). Metaphorical
competence in EFL: Where are we and where should we be going? A view from the language
classroom. AILA
Review, 23(1), 155–173.
McNamara, Tim. 2001. Language
assessments as social practice: challenges for research. Language
Testing, 18(4), 333–349.
Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors
in Learner English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
National Agency for Education. (2017). Skolverkets föreskrifter för kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare (Regulations for municipal adult education in Swedish for
immigrants). SKOLFS 2017:91.
. (2019). Elever och studieresultat i kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare år
2018 (Students and study results in municipal adult education in Swedish for
immigrants
2018). Stockholm: Skolverket.
Pitzl, M-L. (2017). Communicative
‘success’, creativity and the need for de-mystifying L1 use: Some thought on EFT and
ELT. Lingue e
Linguaggi, 241, 37–47.
Prentice, J. (2010). På rak sak. Om ordförbindelser och konventionaliserade uttryck bland unga språkbrukare i flerspråkiga
miljöer (On conventionalized expressions among young language users in
multilingual settings) (Ph.D. thesis). Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Rydell, M. (2018). Construction
of Language Competence. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Assessing Second Language Interaction in Basic Adult
Education (PhD thesis). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sabet, M. K. & Tavakoli, M. (2016). Metaphorical
competence: A neglected component of communicative competence. International Journal of
Education and Literacy
Studies, 4(1), 32–39.
Shohamy, E. (2011). Assessing
multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. The Modern Language
Journal, 95(3), 418–429.
Zanotto, M., Cameron, L. & Cavalcanti, M. (2008). Confronting
Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic
Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
