Cover not available

Article published In: Metaphor in Education: A multilingual perspective
Edited by Katrin Ahlgren, Anne Golden and Ulrika Magnusson
[Metaphor and the Social World 11:2] 2021
► pp. 261–278

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The relationship between topic and metaphor in second-language learners’ essays

 | University of Oslo
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00018.gol
Abstract
In this article I investigate to what extent the use of metaphorical expressions in language learners’ texts vary according to the topic they have chosen to write about. The data come from the Norwegian learner corpus ASK, where the texts are from written assignments produced by adult second-language learners as part of an official Norwegian test and texts. Texts from two different prompts are selected, which are related to friendship and nature. Metaphors are defined according to conceptual metaphor theory and a triangulation of methods is used, alternating between a manual and an automatic extraction method.
The results confirm the hypothesis that the two different prompts given to the learners in a language test not only triggers different metaphorical expressions but also influences the amount of metaphor used in the learners’ writing. This knowledge is important to researchers for comparing the use of metaphors between different groups, such as between different learners or between students in different stages of education. It is also important for test designers who decide on topics to be used in tests and teachers who help learners prepare for their tests. In addition, it is of interest for researchers, educators in general and the learners themselves who are interested in the effect the use of metaphors in texts have on raters’ evaluations in high-stake tests.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metaphor theory
  • 3.Earlier research
  • 4.Data and method
  • 5.Methodology adopted
  • 6.Analysis
  • 7.Findings
  • 8.Discussions and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (56)
References
Ahlgren, K. & Magnusson, U. (this issue). “Second part of the apple”: Friendship metaphors in second language writing.
Andersen, M. S. (2000). Metaphor matters. Hermes – Journal of Linguistics, 241, 57–80. [URL]
Askeland, N. (2008). Lærebøker og forståing av kommunikasjon. Om forståing av begrepet kommunikasjon gjennom metaforar og metaforsignal i seks læreverk i norsk for ungdomstrinnet 1997–99. Oslo: Acta Humaniora.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion talk across corpora. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1997). A few metaphorical models in (western) economic discourse”. In W. A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 115–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphors in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, (2008) Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.),Confronting Metaphor in Use (pp 45-62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. & Besser, S. (2004). Writing in English as an additional language at key stage 2. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 280–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Searching for metaphorical patterns in corpora. In Baker, P. (Ed.), Contemporary corpus linguistics (pp. 9–31). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity vs. natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, S. (Ed.), Language development: Language, culture and cognition (pp. 301–334). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gimbel, J. (1998). Tyrkiske børns fagrelevante danske ordforråd i femte klasse. In J. Møller, P. Quist, A. Holmen & J. N. Jørgensen (Eds.), Tosproget udvikling. Københavnerstudier i tosprogethed. Køgeserien, K41. Denmark: Lærerhøjskole.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golden, A. (1984). Fagord og andre ord i o-fagsbøker for grunnskolen. In A. Hvenekilde & E. Ryen (Eds.), ”Kan jeg få ordene dine, lærer”. Oslo: LNU/Cappelen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Metaphorical expressions in L2 production: The importance of text topic in corpus research. In F. MacArthur, J.-L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García, & A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp.135–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Emotions negotiated in L2 texts: A corpus study of written production by adult learners on a Norwegian test. In A. Golden, S. Jarvis & K. Tenfjord (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence and distinctive patterns of language learning: Findings and insights from a learner corpus (pp. 188–230). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Utvikling av ordforrådet på et andrespråk. In A.-K. H. Gujord & G. T. Randen (Eds.), Norsk som andrespråk – perspektiver på læring og utvikling (s. 190–213). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golden, A. & Kulbrandstad, L. A. (2021). When errors are corrected. In A. Golden, L. A. Kulbrandstad, & L. J. Zhang (Eds), Crossing Borders, Writing Texts, Being Evaluated: Cultural and Disciplinary Norms in Academic Writing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golden, A., Kulbrandstad, L. A. & Tenfjord, K. (2017). Evaluation of texts in tests, or: Where is the dog buried? In A. Golden, S. Jarvis & K. Tenfjord (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence and distinctive patterns of language learning: Findings and insights from a learner corpus (pp. 231–271). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. & Paquot, M. (2009). Lexical Verbs in Academic Discourse. A corpus-driven study of learner use. In M. Charles, D. Pecorari & S. Hunston (Eds.), Academic writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse (pp. 193–214). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. & Prochnow, S. (1991). The difficulties of difficulty: Prompts in writing assessment. In S. Anivan (Ed.), Current Developments in Language Testing. Anthology Series 25 (pp. 58–76). Singapore: Regional Language Centre. Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harsch, C. and Rupp, A. A. (2011). Designing and scaling level-specific writing tasks in alignment with the CEFR: A test-centered approach. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8 (1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huhta, A., Alanen, R., Tarnanen, M., Martin, M. & Hirvelä, T. (2014). Assessing learners’ writing skills in an SLA study: Validating the rating process across tasks, scales and languages. Language Testing, 22(1), 307–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, K. (2019). Becoming a citizen. Linguistic trials and negotiations in the UK. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klintenberg, B. (2014). Akademiska ord i kemi – en studie om högstadieelevers förståelse av akademiska ord i kemiläroböcker. Magisteruppsats. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2008). Brothers in arms: Contradictory metaphors in contemporary marketing discourse. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use (pp. 103–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nemati, M. (2003). The Relationship between Topic difficulty and Mode of Discourse: An In-depth study of EFL Writers’ Production, Recognition, and Attitude”. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 6(2), 87–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olvegård, L. (2014). Herravälde. Är det bara killar eller? Andraspråksläsare möter lärobokstexter i historia för gymnasieskolan. Göteborg: Göteborgsstudier i nordisk språkvetenskap.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2003). The linguistics of political argument: the Spin-Doctor and the Wolf-Pack at the White House. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philips, G. (2009). Non una donna in politica, ma una donna politica: Women’s political language in an Italian context. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 83–111). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Locating metaphor candidates in specialized corpora using raw frequency and keyword lists. In F. MacArthur, J. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García & A. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.) Metaphor in use: context, culture, and communication (pp. 85–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pitzl, A. M. (2018). Creativity in English as a lingua franca: Idiom and metaphor. Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J. (1993/1979). The conduit metaphor. A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164–201). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1990). Responding to different topic types: A quantitative analysis from a contrastive rhetoric perspective In B. Kroll (Ed.) Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 191–210). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruth, L., & Murphy, S. (1988). Designing writing tasks for the assessment of writing. Ablex Pub Corp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Koller, V. (2009). Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Italy. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 36–61). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stålhammar, M. (1997). Metaforernas mönster i fackspråk och allmänspråk. Stockholm: Carlssons Bokforlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In S. T. Stefanowitsch, & A. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 63–105). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenfjord, K., Meurer, P. & Hofland, K. (2006). The ASK corpus – a language learner corpus of Norwegian as a second language [URL]
Viberg, Å. (1993). Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical organization and lexical progression. In K. Hyltenstam & Å. Viberg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 245–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical acquisition: the case of language-specific semantic differentiation. In K. Haastrup & Å. Viberg (Eds.), Perspectives on lexical acquisition in a second language (pp.175–208). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Basic verbs in typological perspective. In M. Van Peteghem, P. Lauwers, E. Tobback, A. Demol & L. De Wilde (Eds.), Le verbe an verve: Réflections sur la syntaxe et la sémantique verbales (pp.255–273). Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Bozdağ, Fatih Ünal
2025. Cognitive Patterns in Learner Texts. In Exploration of the Intersection of Corpus Linguistics and Language Science, ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Shakoury, Kayvan & Frank Boers
2024. Metaphors for multiculturalism in the Canadian context. Metaphor and the Social World 14:2 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Shu, Jing, Gui Wang & Caihua Xu
2024. An exploration of CFL learners’ metaphor use in second language writing: Effects of genre and topic. Journal of Second Language Writing 66 ► pp. 101162 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue