Article published In: Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp.98–120
The #ReframeCovid initiative
From Twitter to society via metaphor
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00013.olz
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00013.olz
Abstract
From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments, health agencies, public institutions and the media around the
world have made use of metaphors to talk about the virus, its effects and the measures needed to reduce its spread. Dominant among these
metaphors have been war metaphors (e.g. battles, front lines, combat), which present the virus as an enemy that needs to be
fought and beaten. These metaphors have attracted an unprecedented amount of criticism from diverse social agents, for a variety of reasons.
In reaction, #ReframeCovid was born as an open, collaborative and non-prescriptive initiative to collect alternatives to war metaphors for
COVID-19 in any language, and to (critically) reflect on the use of figurative language about the virus, its impact and the measures taken
in response. The paper summarises the background, aims, development and main outcomes to date of the initiative, and launches a call for
scholars within the metaphor community to feed into and use the #ReframeCovid collection in their own basic and applied research
projects.
Keywords: COVID-19, pandemic, war metaphors, alternative framings, open-source initiative
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Why #ReframeCovid? (Mis)use of war metaphors in public and health discourse
- 2.1Communicating an emergency
- 2.2Limitations and drawbacks of the war frame in political and health discourse
- 3.Who is behind the #ReframeCovid initiative and what are its main outcomes so far?
- 3.1Linguists on Twitter
- 3.2The #ReframeCovid collection
- 3.2.1Overview of the collaborative document
- 3.2.2Alternative metaphors: Main source and target domains
- 4.How did the initiative develop and how can it keep growing?
- 4.1Beyond the “academic echo chamber”: Media and social impact of the initiative
- 4.2How to use and credit the #ReframeCovid collection
- 5.Final remarks
- Notes
References
References (26)
Benziman, Y. (2020). “Winning” the “battle” and “beating” the COVID-19 “enemy”: Leaders’ use of war frames to define the pandemic. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 26(3), 247–256.
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 3951, 912–920.
Cutler, D. (2020). How will COVID-19 affect the health care economy? The JAMA Forum (Journal of the American Medical Association), 323(22), 2237–2238.
Fernández-Pedemonte, D., Casillo, F., & Jorge-Artigau, A. I. (2020). Communicating COVID-19: Metaphors we “survive” by. Tripodos, 47(2), 145–159.
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783.
Gillis, M. (2020). Ventilators, missiles, doctors, troops. The justification of legislative responses to COVID-19 through military metaphors. Law and Humanities, 14(2), 135–159.
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning. Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley.
Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2015). The war on prevention: Bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 66–77.
Hendricks, R. K., Demjen, Z., Semino, E., & Boroditsky, L. (2018). Emotional implications of metaphor: consequences of metaphor framing for mindset about cancer. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(4), 267–279.
Honigsbaum, M. (2013). Regulating the 1918–19 pandemic: Flu, stoicism and the Northcliffe press. Medical History, 57(2), 165–185.
Kövecses, Z. (2003). The scope of metaphors. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 79–91). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Larson, B. M. H., Nerlich, B., & Wallis, P. (2005). Metaphors and biorisks: The war on infectious diseases and invasive species. Science Communication, 26(3), 243–268.
Martínez-Brawley, E., & Gualda, E. (2020). Transnational social implications of the use of the “war metaphor” concerning coronavirus: A bird’s eye view. Culture e Studi del Sociale, 5(1), 259–272.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Rajandran, K. (2020). “A long battle ahead”: Malaysian and Singaporean prime ministers employ war metaphors for COVID-19. GEMA Online. Journal of Language Studies, 20(3).
Rodríguez-Rey, R., Garrido-Hernansaiz, H., & Collado, S. (2020). Psychological impact and associated factors during the initial stage of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic among the general population in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 23 June.
Rojas, D., & Fernández, L. (2015). ¿Contra qué se lucha cuando se lucha? Implicancias clínicas de la metáfora bélica en oncología. Revista Médica de Chile, 1431, 352–357.
Ruiz, I. (2018). Between horror and obscene beauty: The passion of photojournalism during the War on Drugs in Mexico (2006–2012). Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 27(2), 215–229.
Sabucedo, J. M., Alzate, M., & Hur, D. (2020). COVID-19 y la metáfora de la guerra. Revista de Psicología Social, 351, 618–624.
Semino, E., Demjen, Z., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Payne, S. (2018). Metaphor, cancer and the end of life: A corpus-based study. New York: Routledge.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, B. J., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (59)
Cited by 59 other publications
Augé, Anaïs
Aziz, Amna, Xu Wen, Muhammad Khizar Hayat Naeem & Suman Naeem
Brglez, Mojca, Omnia Zayed & Paul Buitelaar
Busso, Lucia & Ottavia Tordini
2025. How do media talk about the COVID-19 pandemic?. In COVID-19 [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 11], ► pp. 10 ff.
Darics, Erika, Orrie Staschen, Matt Drury, Joanna Chojnicka, Maria Mazzoli, Jelte Olthof, Dimitris Serafis & Janina Wildfeuer
Ferrari, Federica
2025. The voice of the virus or the virus’s shadow?. In COVID-19 [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 11], ► pp. 122 ff.
Laura Filardo-Llamas & Lorena Pérez-Hernández
Fuoli, Matteo & Samantha Ford
Liu, Yufeng, Dechao Li & Jieyun Feng
Pérez-Sobrino, Paula & Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
Türker, Ebru & Jae Hyun Park
Zarchi, Ruth Kaplan & Oshri Bar-Gil
Berrocal, Martina
2024. Maintaining political authority and credibility during the Covid-19 crisis. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 119 ff.
Bigi, Sarah, Giulia Grata & Paola Mosconi
2024. Arguments and framing strategies in Italian public discourse about measures to contrast the Covid-19 pandemic. In Persuasion in Specialized Discourse [Argumentation in Context, 22], ► pp. 71 ff.
Bogetić, Ksenija
Bogetić, Ksenija
2024. Military metaphors in the discourses of the pandemic in two post-Yugoslav states. Metaphor and the Social World 14:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Foley, Jennifer & Laura Hidalgo-Downing
González Luis, Hildegart, Beatriz Gómez Baceiredo, Begoña Errasti Ibarrondo, Ana Choperena, Isabel Díaz Suárez, Amaranta Alfaro & Claudia Pérez Acuña
Krockow, Eva M., Meghann Jones, Carolyn Tarrant, Marc Mendelson & Stephen J. Flusberg
Li, Ke, Yanyu Wang & Shukang Li
Liu, Yufeng & Dechao Li
Liu, Yufeng & Dechao Li
Lucek, Stephen & Dean Phelan
Magaña, Dalia, Arthur Durazo, Lorraine Ramos & Teenie Matlock
Mobarki, Yahya Abdu A. & Fahad Alzahrani
Mohammadi, Ariana N
Romano, Manuela & Maria Josep Cuenca
2024. Conceptualizing the Covid-19 pandemic through similes. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Stern, Chadly & Benjamin C. Ruisch
van Poppel, Lotte & Roosmaryn Pilgram
2024. Exploiting metaphor in disagreement. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Vilar-Lluch, Sara, Kayo Kondo & Emma McClaughlin
Bullo, Stella, Lexi Webster & Jasmine Hearn
Chamberlain, Elizabeth F.
Giorgis, Paola, Olena Semenets & Bilyana Todorova
Giuliani, Alice
Holze, Regina
2023. Shambolic blunder. In Remedies against the Pandemic [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 102], ► pp. 169 ff.
Inya, Onwu
Komatsubara, Tetsuta
2023. Framing risk metaphorically. In Risk Discourse and Responsibility [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 336], ► pp. 65 ff.
McClaughlin, Emma, Sara Vilar-Lluch, Tamsin Parnell, Dawn Knight, Elena Nichele, Svenja Adolphs, Jérémie Clos & Giovanni Schiazza
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
2023. Trump’s framing of Covid-19 as a war and conspiracy theories. In Remedies against the Pandemic [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 102], ► pp. 256 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2025. Divergent conceptualizations of the COVID-19 pandemic and its management as a war in Britain and
Germany. In COVID-19 [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 11], ► pp. 170 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
2025. Figurative framing in political interaction. In Framing in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 354], ► pp. 99 ff.
Negrea-Busuioc, Elena
Paliichuk, Elina
Peng, Zhibin, Yating Yu, Dennis Tay & Michal Ptaszynski
Rossi, Micaela
Wilding, Ell, Sara Bartl, Jeannette Littlemore, Maria Clark & Joanne Brooke
Brugman, Britta C., Ellen Droog, W. Gudrun Reijnierse, Saskia Leymann, Giulia Frezza & Kiki Y. Renardel de Lavalette
Burgers, Christian
Chow, Mei-Yung Vanliza & Jeannette Littlemore
2022. Metaphorical conceptualizations of cancer treatment in English and Chinese languages. International Journal of Language and Culture 9:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Cuenca, Maria-Josep & Manuela Romano
Kazemian, Reza, Hadaegh Rezaei & Somayeh Hatamzadeh
Pérez-Sobrino, Paula, Elena Semino, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Veronika Koller & Inés Olza
Scherr, A.
Stewart, Ellen, Anna Nonhebel, Christian Möller & Kath Bassett
Terceiro, Danielle
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
