Article published In: Metaphor in Mental Healthcare
Edited by Dennis Tay
[Metaphor and the Social World 10:2] 2020
► pp. 214–232
Strategies for using metaphor in psychological treatment
Published online: 13 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00004.tor
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00004.tor
Abstract
In most models of psychotherapy metaphor is considered an important aspect of communication. At the same time
there is a need for a rationale to tell the clinician with what purpose and how to use metaphor for the benefit of the client. The
present article suggests such principles, specifically based on a behavioral approach to human language, relational frame theory
(RFT). This approach has co-developed with a specific model of psychotherapy: acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and the
conclusions in this article are very much in line with that model. Overlap between RFT and a recent linguistic theory of metaphor,
the dynamic approach, is also discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Relational frame theory
- 2.1Relational frame theory and metaphor
- 2.2Relational frame theory and psychological treatment
- 3.The joint venture of rule-following and self-awareness
- 4.The blessing and the curse
- 5.The remedy to “the dark side of the force”
- 6.Why metaphor?
- 7.Introducing metaphor to train psychological flexibility
- 8.Catching metaphors to train psychological flexibility
- 9.Metaphor, co-operation and building therapeutic alliance
- 10.Concluding remarks
References
References (32)
Angus, L. E., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Working with narrative in emotion-focused therapy: Changing stories, healing lives. Washington: American Psy-chological Association.
Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 221, 1482–1493.
Combs, G., & Freedman, J. (1990). Symbol, story and ceremony: Using metaphor in individual and family therapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (eds.) (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. NewYork: Plenum.
Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 451, 237–256.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy. The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 641, 1152–1168.
Horvath, A. O. (2018). Research on the alliance: Knowledge in search of a theory, Psychotherapy Research, 28:4, 499–516.
Lord S. P., Sheng, E., Imel Z.E., Baer J. & Atkins, D.C. (2015) More than reflections: Empathy in motivational interviewing includes language style synchrony between therapist and client. Behavior Therapy. 461:296–303.
Luciano, C. (2017). The self and responding to your own behavior. Implications of coherence and hierarchical framing. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 171, 267–275.
Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Cabello-Luque, F., & Hernández, M. (2009). Developing self-directed rules. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (ed.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (p. 335–352). Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
Mathieson, F., Jordan, J., Carter, J. & Stubbe, M. (2015). Nailing Down Metaphors in CBT: Definition, Identification and Frequency. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 1(2), 1–13.
McHugh, L., Stewart, I. & Almada, P. (2019). A contextual behavioral guide to the self. Theory and practice. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
McMullen, L. M. (2008). Putting it in context: Metaphor and psychotherapy. In R. W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (p. 397–411). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and walking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C., & Cienki, A. (2009). Words, gestures and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In C. J. Forceville & E. Urio-Aparisi (ed.), Multimodal metaphor (p. 297–328). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Needham-Didsbury, I. (2014). Metaphor in psychotherapeutic discourse: Implications for utterance interpretation. Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics, 501, 75–97.
O’Hora, D. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Instructional control: developing a relational frame analysis. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 111, p. 263–284.
Ramnerö, J. & Törneke, N. (2008). The ABCs of human behavior: Behavioral principles for the practicing clinician. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Semin, G. R. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, coordination, and co-regulation. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (ed) Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientic approaches. (p. 119–147) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Kleinmuntz (ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 133–171) NY: Wiley.
Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Understanding metaphor: A relational frame perspective. Behavior Analyst, 241, 191–199.
Steen, G. J. (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor–now new and improved. Review of cognitive linguistics, 9:1, 26–64.
Stine, J. J. (2005). The use of metaphors in the service of the therapeutic alliance and therapeutic communication. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry 331, 531–545.
Stott, R., Mansell, W., Salkovskis, P., Lavender, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2010). Oxford guide to metaphors in CBT: Building cognitive bridges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tay, D. (2013). Metaphor in psychotherapy: A descriptive and prescriptive analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamimins Publishing Co..
Törneke, N. (2017). Metaphor in practice. A professional’s guide to using the science of language in psychotherapy. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
Törneke, N., Luciano, C., & Valdivia Salas, S. (2008). Rule-governed behaviour and psychological problems. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 81, 141–156.
Törneke, N., Luciano, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Bond, F. (2016). RFT for clinical practice: Three core strategies in understanding and treating human suffering. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & T. Biglan (ed.), Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (p. 254–272). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Burnside, Elizabeth & Steve Noone
Friedrich, Jannis, Martin H. Fischer & Markus Raab
Rabarbari, Elisa, Giulia Magni, Claudia Repetto & Giuseppe Riva
Crego, Antonio, José Ramón Yela & Rita Ozores-Pérez
Kirmayer, Laurence J.
Ma, Wen & Qingsong Liu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
