Cover not available

Article published In: Words & Constructions: Language complexity in linguistics and psychology
Edited by Juhani Järvikivi, Pirita Pyykkönen-Klauck and Matti Laine
[The Mental Lexicon 9:2] 2014
► pp. 144–169

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Complexity in linguistic theorizing

 | University of Helsinki
Published online: 21 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.2.01kar
The general notion of ‘complexity’ is discussed based on foundational ideas by Herbert Simon and Nicholas Rescher. An analytic overview is provided of the ways in which language complexity has been treated in linguistic theories during the past 200 years. The Schlegel brothers, Humboldt, and Schleicher developed the first theory of complexity with their tripartition of languages into progressively complex morphological types. Humboldt also provided the principle of One Meaning – One Form (Humboldt’s Universal) which has turned out to be a widespread tendency in the simplification of morphological complexity. Jespersen’s Ease Theory has been influential in highlighting many instances of phonological change. The main contribution of Structuralism was Markedness Theory, the idea that language at all levels is built on minimal oppositions where one term (e.g. voiceless or singular) is more basic than its complex counterpart (e.g. voiced or plural). Syntactic complexity came to the fore with the theory of Immediate Constituents giving tools for measuring syntactic depth. Generative linguistics tried to measure syntactic complexity by devising Evaluation Measures based on symbol counting. Current linguistics offers a plethora of empirical studies at all levels, invoking considerations of both system, processing, and cognitive complexity.
References (66)
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation. A cross-linguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1992). Language and species. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blankenship, J. (1974). The influence of mode, submode, and speaker predilection on style. Speech Monographs, 411, 85–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The origins of complex language. An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chipere, N. (2003). Understanding complex sentences: Native speaker variation in syntactic competence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959). On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control, 21, 137–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1992). Before complexity. In Murray Gell-Mann, & John A. Hawkins (Eds.), The Evolution of human languages: Proceedings of the workshop on the evolution of human languages, held August 1989 in Santa Fe, New Mexico (pp. 193–211).Redwood, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2006). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P.W. (2013). Grammar & complexity. Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deutscher, G. (2009). “Overall complexity”: A wild goose chase? In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 243–251.
Dressler, W.U. (1987). Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Studies in Language Companion Series, 10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Einarsson, J. (1978). Talad och skriven svenska. Sociolingvistiska studier. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap. SERIE C NR 9. Lund: Walter Ekstrand Bokförlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel, E. (1911). Deutsche stilkunst. Vienna & Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky A-G.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everett, D. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46 (4), 621–646 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 681, 1–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T., & Shibatani, M. (Eds.). (2009). Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution. Typological Studies in Language, 85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42 (1), 25–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J.A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, C. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: The Macmillan Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von. (1836). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Druckerei der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1999). Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (7), 272–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1932). Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Charistia Guglielmo Mathesio Quinquagenario a discipulis et Circuli Linguistici Pragensis sodalibus oblata (pp. 74–84). Prague: Cercle linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1936). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen kasus. In Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague VI1 (pp. 240–288). Praha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1942). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska bokhandeln.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language, its nature, development & origin. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1941). Efficiency in linguistic change. Det Kgl. danske videnskabernes selskab. Historisk-filologiske meddelelser, 27 (4). København: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. (2007). Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (2), 365–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinsella, A.R. (2009). Language evolution and syntactic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kordmann, B., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2009). World Englishes between simplification and complexification. In Lucia Siebers, & Thomas Hoffmann (eds.), World Englishes – problems, properties and prospects: Selected papers from the 13th IAWE conference (pp. 265–285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kusters, W. (2003). Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Ph.D. diss., University of Leiden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2009). The emergence of linguistic complexity. In Givón, & Shibatani (Eds.), 405–432.
Martinet, A. (1955). Économie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bibliotheca Romanica. Manualia et Commentationes X. Berne: Éditions A. Francke S.A.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W. (1980). Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Linguistische Forschungen, 28. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (2001). The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 51, 126–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, J-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., & Gray, M.K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J.B., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M.A., & Aiden, E.L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331 (6014), 176–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. (2008). Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, & Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), 23–42.
Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K., & Karlsson, F. (2008b). Introduction: The problem of language complexity. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, and Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change (pp. vii–xiv). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. (1987). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 171, 748–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (1992). Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Linguistic complexity: A comprehensive definition and a survey. In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 110–125.
Paul, H. (1920 [1886]). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Fünfte Auflage. Halle a. S.: Verlag von Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, R.D. (1992). Deixis, grammar, and culture. Typological Studies in Language 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1998). Complexity: A philosophical overview. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, G., Gil, D., & Trudgill, P. (Eds.). (2009). Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (1863). Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann Bühlau.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (6), 467–482.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, K. (2008). Complexity trade-offs in core argument marking. In Miestamo, Sinnemäki, & Karlsson 2008a (Eds.), 67–88.
. (2011). Language universals and linguistic complexity. Three studies in core argument marking. Ph. D. diss., Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Available at: [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (Forthcoming). Complexity trade-offs: A case study. In Frederick J. Newmeyer, & Laurel B. Preston (Eds.), Measuring linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7 (4), 263–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 141, 638–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traxler, M.J. (2012). Introduction to psycholinguistics. Understanding language science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2009). Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Sampson, Gil, & Trudgill (Eds.), 98–109.
Wells, R.S. (1947). Immediate constituents. Language, 23 (1), 81–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurzel, W.U. (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. Studia Grammatica, 21. Berlin: Akademie-Vlg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yngve, V.A. (1960). A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104 (5), 444–466.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Paquot, Magali
2025. Complexity Is a “Markedly Complex Idea”—But How Complex Should It Be to Serve as a Useful Construct in Second Language Research?: A Commentary on “Complexity and Difficulty in Second Language Acquisition: A Theoretical and Methodological Overview”. Language Learning 75:2 ► pp. 603 ff. DOI logo
Bauer, Laurie
2023. A terminological problem. Diachronica 40:3 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Säily, Tanja, Turo Vartiainen & Harri Siirtola
2017. Exploring part-of-speech frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue