Cover not available

Article published In: Semantic Considerations of Lexical Processing
[The Mental Lexicon 9:1] 2014
► pp. 1–22

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Semantic effects in word recognition are moderated by body-object interaction

 | Clarke University
 | Wayne State University
Published online: 25 April 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.1.01hav
A potential embodied influence in the semantic effects of Danger and Usefulness is investigated using Body-Object Interaction (BOI). Lexical decision times are influenced by ratings of Danger and Usefulness. In a frequently-found interaction, thought to be produced by activated approach-withdraw motor responses, increasing Danger ratings produce faster responses for items with lower Usefulness ratings while producing slower responses for items with higher Usefulness ratings. BOI is used to test the embodied explanation of this interaction. The same 102 words were presented in two lexical decision experiments. In both auditory and visual lexical decision, the effects of Danger and Usefulness were found to be diminished for items with higher BOI ratings. BOI moderates Danger and Usefulness effects in both auditory and visual lexical decision, in a way that suggests BOI is either the stronger or the temporally earlier effect.
References (50)
Baayen, R. H. (2008a). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004). Statistics in psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards. Mental Lexicon Working Papers , 11, 1-45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008b). The languageR library, version 1.0. Retrieved from: [URL]
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, B. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language , 591, 390-412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods , 391, 445-459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 22(4), 577-660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology , 591, 617-645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, S. D. R., Burnett, A. N., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2011). Imageability and body-object interaction for 599 multisyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods , 4(4), 1100-1109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boot, I., & Pecher, D. (2008). Word recognition is affected by the meaning of orthographic neighbours: Evidence from semantic decision tasks. Language and Cognitive Processes , 23(3), 375-393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 25(5-6), 6-224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Hector, J. (2002). Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing the turple effect. Memory & Cognition , 30(7), 1106-1116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes , 121, 613-656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 9(3), 558-565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review , 1111, 662-720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping , 21(3), 191-201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 14(3), 436-441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science , 20(9), 1169-1174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods , 42(3), 627-633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kryuchkova, T., Tucker, B. V., Wurm, L. H., & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Danger and usefulness are detected early in auditory lexical processing: Evidence from electroencephalography. Brain and Language , 122(2), 81-91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science , 21(10), 1423-1425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology , 101, 29-63. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods , 371, 547-559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 1261, 99-130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science , 15(4), 243-247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myung, J.-Y., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition , 98(3), 223-243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., & Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science , 14(2), 106-112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Härle, M., & Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or talking?: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language , 781, 143-168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & llmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience , 21(3), 793-797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, M. D. (1998). Running from William James' bear: A review of preattentive mechanisms and their contributions to emotional experience. Cognition and Emotion , 12(5), 667-696. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008a). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body-object interaction effect. Cognition , 106(1), 433-443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Sears, C. R., Wilson, K., Locheed, K., & Owen, W. J. (2008b). The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: Body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing. Cognitive Science , 32(3), 591-605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54(5), 768-777. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tillotson, S. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Body-object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods , 40(4), 1075-1078. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tom, G., Pettersen, P., Lau, T., Burton, T., & Cook, J. (1991). The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic & Applied Social Psychology , 12(3), 281-289. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wellsby, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Owen, W. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2011). Embodied semantic processing: The body-object interaction effect in a non-manual task. Language & Cognition , 3(1), 1-14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, M. D. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, Version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers , 20(1), 6-10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 9(4), 625-636. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witherell, D., Wurm, L. H., Seaman, S. R., Brugnone, N. A., & Fulford, E. T. (2012). Danger and usefulness effects as a function of concept ancientness. The Mental Lexicon , 7(2), 183-209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, L. H. (2007). Danger and usefulness: An alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 14(6), 1218-1225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012). Auditory and visual processing of pseudowords are affected by their connotations of danger and usefulness. Presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN, November 15-18. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 4.
Wurm, L. H., & Ross, S. E. (2001). Conditional root uniqueness points: Psychological validity and perceptual consequences. Journal of Memory and Language , 45(1), 39-57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, L. H., & Seaman, S. R. (2008). Semantic effects in naming and perceptual identification, but not in delayed naming: Implications for models and tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 34(2), 381-398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, L. H., & Vakoch, D. A. (2000). The adaptive value of lexical connotation in speech perception. Cognition and Emotion , 14(2), 177-191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, L. H., Vakoch, D. A., Seaman, S. R., & Buchanan, L. (2004). Semantic effects in auditory word recognition. Mental Lexicon Working Papers , 11, 47-62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, L. H., Whitman, R. D., Seaman, S. R., Hill, L., & Ulstad, H. M. (2007). Semantic processing in auditory lexical decision: Ear-of-presentation and sex differences. Cognition and Emotion , 21(7), 1470-1495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yap, M. J., Pexman, P. M., Wellsby, M., Hargreaves, I. S., & Huff, M. J. (2012). An abundance of riches: Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , 6, 72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science , 19(9), 838-842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science , 313(5792), 1451-1452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Lalancette, Audrey, Élisabeth Garneau, Alice Cochrane & Maximiliano A. Wilson
2024. Body–object interaction ratings for 3600 French nouns. Behavior Research Methods 56:7 ► pp. 8009 ff. DOI logo
Miceli, A., E. Wauthia, L. Lefebvre, G.T. Vallet, L. Ris & I. Simoes Loureiro
2022. Differences related to aging in sensorimotor knowledge: Investigation of perceptual strength and body object interaction. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 102 ► pp. 104715 ff. DOI logo
Heard, Alison, Christopher R. Madan, Andrea B. Protzner & Penny M. Pexman
2019. Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical–semantic processing. Behavior Research Methods 51:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pexman, Penny M., Emiko Muraki, David M. Sidhu, Paul D. Siakaluk & Melvin J. Yap
2019. Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body–object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods 51:2 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
ALONSO, MARÍA ÁNGELES, EMILIANO DÍEZ, ANTONIO M. DÍEZ-ÁLAMO & ANGEL FERNANDEZ
2018. Body–object interaction ratings for 750 Spanish words. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:6 ► pp. 1239 ff. DOI logo
Van Havermaet, Lisa R. & Lee H. Wurm
2017. Effects of Danger, Usefulness, and Body-Object Interaction in picture naming. The Mental Lexicon 12:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Wurm, Lee H.
2015. Auditory and visual processing of novel stimuli are affected by subjective connotations of Danger and Usefulness. The Mental Lexicon 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue