Cover not available

Article published In: Phonological and Phonetic considerations of Lexical Processing
[The Mental Lexicon 8:3] 2013
► pp. 295–319

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Production and accent affect memory

 | University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
 | University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA / Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut
Published online: 7 April 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.02cho
In three experiments, we examined the effects of accents and production on free recall and yes/no recognition memory. In the study phase, native English participants heard English words pronounced by a speaker with an accent that is highly familiar to the participant (American English) or with a less familiar accent (Dutch). Participants had to either say aloud (produce) the word that they heard in their natural pronunciation (Exp. 1a) or imitate the original speaker (Exp. 1b) or simply listen to the word. In all experiments, in both recall and recognition, produced words and words spoken in an unfamiliar accent were more likely to be recalled and more likely to be recognized, than words that were listened to or words spoken in a more familiar accent. In recognition but not in recall, listening to words spoken in an unfamiliar accent improved memory more than listening to words spoken in a familiar accent. Results suggest that listening allows the acoustic-phonetic details of a speaker to be retained in memory, but that production attenuates details about the original speaker’s pronunciation. Finally, the benefit of production for memory does not differ whether one produces in one’s natural accent or imitates that of the speaker.
References (38)
References
Adank, P., Hagoort, P., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychological Science, 211, 1903–1909. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 351, 520–529. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M. S. (2005). Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 387–414. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C. T., Bradlow, A. R., Guion-Anderson, S., & Polka, L. (2011). Using the lens of phonetic experience to resolve phonological forms. Journal of Phonetics, 391, 453–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics , 201, 305–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 1061, 707–729. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 271, 1491–1494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. A. (1992). Power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 1121, 155–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, K. W., & Feldman, L. B. (2013). Repetition benefits memory even when listening to accented speech. Under Review .
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 335–359. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 11, 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Metaanalysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 11, 170–177. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M. (1983). Native reactions to non-native speech: A review of empirical research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 51, 160–176. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of new and similar phonemes in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics , 151, 47–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on nonnative subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 251, 437–470. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in english: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 381, 379–412. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 221, 1166–1183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 1051, 251–279. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Logan, J. S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 171,152–162. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanulikova, A., Van Alphen, P. M., Van Goch, M. M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 241, 878–887. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 971, 11850–11857. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 51, 831–843. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lecumberri, M. L. G., Cooke, M., & Cutler, A. (2010). Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review. Speech Communication, 521, 864–886. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 461, 1093–1096. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 191, 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 361, 671–685. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 321, 543–562. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meador, D., Flege, J. E., & Mackay, I. R. A. (2000). Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 31, 55–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muench, K. L., & Creel, S. C. (2013). Gradient phonological inconsistency affects vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition . Advance online publication. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Dewing, T. M. (1995a). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech , 381, 289–306. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995b). Foreign accent comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 451, 73–97. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 601, 355–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nguyen, N., Dufour, S., & Brunellière, A. (2012). Does imitation facilitate word recognition in a non-native regional accent? Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 1–7. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, P. M., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (1999). The effects of speaker accent and target predictability on perception of mispronunciations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 421, 56–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1171, 34–50. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommers, M. S., & Barcroft, J. (2007). An integrated account of the effects of acoustic variability in first language and second language: Evidence from amplitude, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 231–249. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Indexical information, encoding difficulty, and second language vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 321, 417–434. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommers, M. S., & Lewis, B. P. (1999). Who really lives next door: Creating false memories with phonological neighbors. Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 83–108. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Xu, Ziyuan, Haruka Amano, Dongye Lyu, Yuanyuan Cao & Hirotaka Matsuoka
2025. How Language Affects Audience Cognition in Sports Sponsorship: Insights From Esports Broadcasting. Sport Marketing Quarterly DOI logo
López Assef, Belén, Stephanie Strahm, Keara Boyce, Mike Page & Tania Zamuner
2023. Production benefits recall of novel words with frequent, but not infrequent sound patterns. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo
Tsang, Tsz Wing & Hui Jing Lu
2022. Hand movement improves word memory of Grade 1 students. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology 10:3 ► pp. 408 ff. DOI logo
Wakeham-Lewis, Rachelle M., Jason Ozubko & Jonathan M. Fawcett
2022. Characterizing production: the production effect is eliminated for unusual voices unless they are frequent at study. Memory 30:10 ► pp. 1319 ff. DOI logo
Chan, Kit Ying, Ming Ming Chiu, Brady A. Dailey & Daroon M. Jalil
2019. Effect of Foreign Accent on Immediate Serial Recall. Experimental Psychology 66:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Foucart, Alice, Hernando Santamaría-García & Robert J. Hartsuiker
2019. Short exposure to a foreign accent impacts subsequent cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia 129 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Romero-Rivas, Carlos, Craig Thorley, Katie Skelton & Albert Costa
2019. Foreign accents reduce false recognition rates in the DRM paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 31:5-6 ► pp. 507 ff. DOI logo
Zamuner, Tania S., Stephanie Strahm, Elizabeth Morin‐Lessard & Michael P.A. Page
2018. Reverse production effect: children recognize novel words better when they are heard rather than produced. Developmental Science 21:4 DOI logo
Cho, Kit W. & Laurie Beth Feldman
2016. When repeating aloud enhances episodic memory for spoken words: interactions between production- and perception-derived variability. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28:6 ► pp. 673 ff. DOI logo
Grohe, Ann-Kathrin & Andrea Weber
2016. The Penefit of Salience: Salient Accented, but Not Unaccented Words Reveal Accent Adaptation Effects. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo
Grohe, Ann-Kathrin & Andrea Weber
2018. Memory advantage for produced words and familiar native accents. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 30:5-6 ► pp. 570 ff. DOI logo
Grohe, Ann‐Kathrin & Andrea Weber
2016. Learning to Comprehend Foreign‐Accented Speech by Means of Production and Listening Training. Language Learning 66:S2 ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue