Article published In: Methodological and Analytic Frontiers in Lexical Research (Part I)
Edited by Gonia Jarema, Gary Libben † and Chris Westbury
[The Mental Lexicon 5:3] 2010
► pp. 421–435
Chinese as a natural experiment
Published online: 17 February 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.09mye
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.09mye
The Chinese lexicon is characterized by its typologically unique one-to-one-to-one mapping of morphemes, syllables, and orthographic characters. This architecture poses practical difficulties for the psycholinguist wanting to study lexical processing in Chinese. More seriously, seen as a natural experiment, Chinese challenges assumptions that processing models traditionally make about the roles of phonemes, morphemes, lemmas, and words in lexical access. It is argued that cross-linguistic variation in lexical processing cannot be accommodated by simply modifying lexical processing models, but instead what is needed is a universal learning model. Suggestions are given for how such a model could be tested empirically by extending methods already used for testing language-specific lexical processing.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Cheng, Xi, Chi-Shing Tse, Yuen-Lai Chan, Kai Yan Lau & Yen Na Yum
Alderete, John & Padraig G. O'Séaghdha
Lee, Chao-Yang & Seth Wiener
Liu, Jiang & Seth Wiener
Wiener, Seth, Chao‐Yang Lee & Liang Tao
Zevin, Jason D.
Wiener, Seth, Kiwako Ito & Shari R Speer
Wiener, Seth, Kiwako Ito & Shari R. Speer
O'Séaghdha, Padraig G.
Derwing, Bruce L. & David Eddington
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
