Article published In: The Representation and Processing of Morphologically Complex Words
Edited by Lori Buchanan and Roberto G. de Almeida
[The Mental Lexicon 19:2] 2024
► pp. 253–284
Long-lag morphological priming and inflectional paradigm size effects in Estonian and Finnish text reading
Published online: 1 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24035.loo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24035.loo
Abstract
Morphological priming and paradigm size effects have been
established in single word reading studies, however, morphological priming
effects in longer texts have not been observed, and, to the best of our
knowledge, paradigmatic effects in text reading have not yet been examined. The
current study utilized the Multilingual Eye-Tracking Corpus MECO (Siegelman, N., Schroeder, S., Acartüirk, C., Ahn, H.-D., Alexeeva, S., Amenta, S., Bertram, R., Bonandrini, R., Brysbaert, M., Chernova, D., et al. (2022). Expanding
horizons of cross-linguistic research on reading: The multilingual
eye-movement corpus. Behavior Research
Methods, 54(6), 2843–2863. ) to explore
paradigmatic and morphological priming effects during text reading in Estonian
and Finnish, two morphologically rich Finno-Ugric languages. The results showed
clear inflectional paradigm size effects for Estonian during text reading in
several eye movement measures, but not for Finnish. This may be linked to the
support from the inflectional paradigm being semantically more beneficial to the
reader in Estonian than in Finnish. The current study also showed clear long-lag
inflectional priming effects in text reading, unlike what was observed in prior
studies in Dutch, English, and Spanish. This study is thus the first to show
that inflectional priming can extend beyond word or sentence level and suggest
that inflectional variants of a particular word in Estonian and Finnish get and
remain activated even when text context is present.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Estonian and Finnish inflection
- 1.2Inflectional priming in single word studies
- 1.3Paradigmatic effects in single words studies
- 1.4Morphological priming and paradigmatic effects in sentence and text reading context
- 1.5The current study
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials
- 2.3Procedure
- 3.Analyses
- 3.1Predictor and response variables
- 3.2Collinearity
- 3.3Modelling strategy
- 4.Results
- 4.1Estonian gaze duration
- 4.2Estonian total fixation duration
- 4.3Estonian rereading
- 4.4Finnish gaze duration
- 4.5Finnish total fixation duration
- 4.6Finnish rereading
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
References
References (47)
Amenta, S. & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological
processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in
visual word identification. Frontiers in
Psychology, 31.
Baayen, R. H. & Linke, M. (2020). An
introduction to the generalized additive
model. In S. T. Gries & M. Paquot (Eds.), A
practical handbook of corpus linguistics. Springer,
Berlin.(forthcoming). Springer, Berlin.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipovic Durdjevic, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An
amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based
on naive discriminative
learning. Psychological
Review, 118(3), 438–481.
Baayen, R. H., Vasishth, S., Bates, D., & Kliegl, R. (2017). The
cave of shadows. addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed
models. Journal of Memory and
Language, 561, 206–234.
Bertram, R. (2011). Eye
movements and morphological processing in
reading. The Mental
Lexicon, 6(1), 83–109.
Bertram, R. & Hyönä, J. (2023). The
importance of eye movement research for gaining insight into morphological
processing. In Linguistic
Morphology in the Mind and
Brain (pp. 121–136). Routledge.
Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Laine, M. (2000). The
role of context in morphological processing: Evidence from
Finnish. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 15(4–5), 367–388.
Cop, U., Dirix, N., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2017). Presenting
geco: An eyetracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence
reading. Behavior Research
Methods, 491, 602–615.
Coskun, M., Kuperman, V., & Rueckl, J. (2023). Long-lag
repetition priming in natural text reading: No evidence for morphological
effects. The Mental
Lexicon, 18(1), 1–40.
Dann, K. M., Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2021). Morphological
preview effects in english are restricted to suffixed
words. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 47(8), 1338.
De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Morphological
resonance in the mental
lexicon. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological
structure in language
processing (pp. 65–88). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Deutsch, C. A., Tewksbury, J. J., Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Merrill, S. C., Huey, R. B., & Naylor, R. L. (2018). Increase
in crop losses to insect pests in a warming
climate. Science, 361(6405), 916–919.
Feldman, L. B. (1994). Beyond
orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and
derivations. Journal of Memory and
Language, 33(4), 442–470.
Feldman, L. B. & Bentin, S. (1994). Morphological
analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from
Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Experimental
Psychology, 47(2), 407–435.
Feldman, L. B. & Milin, P. (2018). Psycholinguistic
studies of word morphology and their implications for models of the mental
lexicon and lexical
processing. In Morphological
Processing and Literacy
Development (pp. 16–47). Routledge.
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. (2019). An
R Companion to Applied Regression. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, third edition.
Friedman, L. & Wall, M. (2005). Graphical
views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple
regression. The American
Statistician, 591, 127–136.
Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, D. (1984). Morphemic
structure and lexical access. Attention and
performance, (pp. 211–226).
Kaalep, H.-J. & Muischnek, K. (2005). The
corpora of estonian at the university of tartu: the current
situation. In Proceedings
of the Second Baltic Conference on Human Language
Technologies (pp. 267–272).
Kamienkowski, J. E., Carbajal, M. J., Bianchi, B., Sigman, M., & Shalom, D. E. (2018). Cumulative
repetition effects across multiple readings of a word: Evidence from eye
movements. Discourse
Processes, 55(3), 256–271.
Karlsson, F. (1986). Frequency
considerations in morphology. STUF-Language
Typology and
Universals, 39(1–4), 19–28.
(2015). Finnish:
An Essential Grammar, 3rd edition. (Routledge Essential
Grammars). London & New York: Routledge.
Kuperman, V. (2022). A
cross-linguistic study of spatial parameters of eye-movement control during
reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and
Performance, 48(11), 1213.
Laine, M. & Virtanen, P. (1999). WordMill
Lexical Search Program. University of Turku, Finland: Center for Cognitive Neuroscience.
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., & Baayen, R. H. (2018a). Whole-word
frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected
noun
processing. Cognition, 1751, 20–25.
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., & Baayen, R. H. (2018b). Production
of estonian case-inflected nouns shows whole-word frequency and paradigmatic
effects. Morphology, 281, 71–97.
Lõo, K., Tomaschek, F., Lippus, P., & Tucker, B. V. (2023). Paradigmatic
and syntagmatic effects in estonian spontaneous
speech. Language and
Speech, 66(2), 474–499.
Lõo, K., Toth, A., Karaca, F., & Järvikivi, J. (2022). Morphological
processing is gradient not discrete in L1 and L2 English masked
priming. The Mental
Lexicon, 17(1), 76–103.
Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Paradigms
bit by bit: an information-theoretic approach to the processing of
paradigmatic structure in inflection and
derivation. In J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy
in grammar: form and
acquisition (pp. 214–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Morphological
family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared
to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 301, 1271–1278.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting
the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological
processing. Cognition, 941, 1–18.
Mousikou, P. & Schroeder, S. (2019). Morphological
processing in single-word and sentence
reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 45(5), 881.
Müante, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition
of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related
brain potentials. Cognitive Brain
Research, 7(3), 241–253.
Paterson, K. B., Alcock, A., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Morphological
priming during reading: Evidence from eye
movements. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 26(4–6), 600–623.
Raveh, M. (2002). The
contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological
processing. Brain and
Language, 81(1–3), 312–325.
Raveh, M. & Rueckl, J. G. (2000). Equivalent
effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in
fragment completion and lexical
decision. Journal of Memory and
Language, 42(1), 103–119.
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Münte, T. F., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Morphological
priming in Spanish verb forms: An erp repetition priming
study. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 14(3), 443–454.
Royle, P., Drury, J. E., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). The
temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked erp priming study
of french
verbs. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3542–3553.
Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V. (2021). Complex:
An eye-movement database of compound word reading in. Behavior Research
Methods, 531, 59–77.
Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How
complex simplex words can be. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 371, 118–139.
Siegelman, N., Schroeder, S., Acartüirk, C., Ahn, H.-D., Alexeeva, S., Amenta, S., Bertram, R., Bonandrini, R., Brysbaert, M., Chernova, D., et al. (2022). Expanding
horizons of cross-linguistic research on reading: The multilingual
eye-movement corpus. Behavior Research
Methods, 54(6), 2843–2863.
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory
representation for morphologically related
words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 181, 399–412.
Tomaschek, F., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Strategies
for addressing collinearity in multivariate linguistic
data. Journal of
Phonetics, 711, 249–267.
Viitso, T.-R. (2007). Estonian
language, chapter Structure of the Estonian language:
Phonology, morphology and word
formation, (pp. 9–92). Estonian Academy Publishers.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
