Cover not available

Article published In: The Representation and Processing of Morphologically Complex Words
Edited by Lori Buchanan and Roberto G. de Almeida
[The Mental Lexicon 19:2] 2024
► pp. 191–223

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Finnish noun inflections and the FLH from two perspectives

ORCiD logo with link | University of AlbertaEdmonton
 | National Chung Cheng UniversityChiayi
 | University of AlbertaEdmonton
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Alberta.

Published online: 1 April 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24034.der
Abstract
Through a consideration of the noun inflections of Finnish, we examine Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 21, pp. 257–294. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar full-listing hypothesis (FLH), that whole-word forms are stored in the mental lexicons of language learners/users. While previous studies have consistently confirmed that complex derivational constructions are stored/retrieved this way in Finnish, the current consensus is that the inflectional forms are not, primarily because of the extremely large number that Finnish grammar projects. We challenge this reasoning in favor of a new theory that posits a dual lexicon for inflections, one for the full forms of stems and a parallel one for inflectional affix strings. To test this, we performed a segmentation experiment assessing the relative salience of morpheme and syllable boundaries in Finnish nouns, and also examined a large corpus of quasi-natural spoken dialogues for further evidence. Together, our findings demonstrated that the salience of the boundaries we examined was consistent with our expectations, that the number of inflected forms used in our corpus was only a tiny fraction of those predicted by rule, and that their productivity was highly correlated with their frequencies. While this evidence does not fully confirm the dual lexicon hypothesis, it does strongly indicate that no online grammatical rules are involved.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Two competing approaches
  • 3.Why the FLH?
    • 3.1How the FLH might enhance lexical access and use
    • 3.2An FLH-inspired experiment involving word-internal boundaries
      • Method
        • Participants
        • Materials
        • Procedure
      • Results
      • Discussion
    • 3.3The biggest challenge for the FLH
  • 4.Our corpus investigation: Three views of Finnish nouns
    • 4.1Preamble
    • 4.2The corpus
    • 4.3Frequency, productivity, and transitional probability
      • 4.3.1Frequency
      • 4.3.2Productivity
      • 4.3.3Transitional probability
    • 4.4Discussion
  • 5.General discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Anttila, R. (1985). Dynamics in morphology. Acta linguistica Academiae scientiarum hungaricae, 35(1/2), 3–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnfield, S., Roach, P., Setter, J., Greasley, P., & Horton, D. (1995). Emotional stress and speech tempo variability. Proceedings of the ESCA/NATO Workshop on Speech Under Stress, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9(4), 321–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M. (2016). Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1174–1220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Renouf, A. (1996). Chronicling the Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language, 72(1), 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Divjak, D. (2017). Ordinal GAMMs: A new window on human ratings. Each venture a new beginning. Studies in honor of Laura A. Janda. Slavica, 39–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 568–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74(2), B13–B25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language, 791, 737–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 21, pp. 257–294. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., & Hooper, P. (2001). Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In J. L. Bybee & P. Hooper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence if linguistic structure. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS ONE, 5(6), e10729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chuang, Y.-Y., Lõo, K., Blevins, J. P., & Baayen, R. H. (2020). Estonian case inflection made simple. A case study in Word and Paradigm morphology with Linear Discriminative Learning. In L. Körtvélyessy, & P. Štekauer (Eds.) Complex words: Advances in morphology (pp. 119–141). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., Corral, J., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior: The case of Greek. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985). Morphonology: The dynamics of derivation. Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I. (2004). Iso suomen kielioppi. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hankamer (1989). Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 392–408). The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Järvikivi, J., Bertram, R., & Niemi, J. (2006). Affixal salience and the processing of derivational morphology: The role of suffix allomorphy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(4), 394–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, D. (1980). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Garland Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. (1986). Frequency considerations in morphology, Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung, 39(1), 19–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlsson, F., & Koskenniemi, K. (1985). A process model of morphology and the lexicon. Folio Linguistica, 19(1–2), 207–232.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kowal, S., Wiese, R., & O’Connell, D. C. (1983). The use of time in storytelling. Language and Speech, 261, 377–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laeufer, C. (1995). Morphology and syllabification domains, Lingua, 971, 101–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., & Hyönä, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language, Cognitive Neuropsychology 12(5), 457–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lison, P., & Tiedemann, J. (2016). Opensubtitles2016: Extracting large parallel corpora from movie and tv subtitles. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016). 20161, 923–929.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Whole-word frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected processing. Cognition, 1751, 20–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, L. (1997). Spoken word production and its breakdown in aphasia. Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niemi, J., Laine, M. & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model, Language & Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 423–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolaev, A., & Bermel, N. (2023). Studying negative evidence in Finnish language corpora. Word Structure, 16(2–3), 206–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., & Saffran, J. R. (2009). Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities. Cognition, 113(2), 244–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, I., & Baayen, H. (2009). Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language, 85(1), 109–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, S. (2017). Phraseology and polysynthesis. In M. Fortescue, M. Mithun, & N. Evans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, pp. 203–216. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, S., Libben, G., & Derwing, B. (2002). Morphological representation in an endangered, polysynthetic language, Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 473–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soveri, A., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2007). Word frequency and morphological processing in Finnish revisited. The Mental Lexicon, 2(3), 359–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, S. P., & Newport, E. L. (2007). Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development, 3(1), 1–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, S., & Mäkisalo, J. (2008). The language of subtitles: A corpus compilation and research project. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & M. Thelen (Eds.) Translation and meaning: Part 81. 345–351. UPM, Universitaire Pers Maastricht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The usage-based theory of language acquisition, In E. L. Bavin (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 69–87). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification, Journal of Memory and Language, 291, 66–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61(2), 589–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State (2024). [URL]
Vannest, J., Bertram, R., Järvikivi, J., & Niemi, J. (2002). Counterintuitive cross-linguistic differences: More morphological computation in English than in Finnish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 311, 83–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & van Rijn, D. (2015). itsadug: Interpreting time series and autocorrelated data using GAMMs. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue