Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon: Online-First Articles

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Morphological salience effects of prefixes and suffixes embedded in French words

ORCiD logo with link | CLLE- University of Toulouse CNRS
 | CLLE- University of Toulouse CNRS
 | University of Verona
Published online: 3 July 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24033.gir
Abstract
According to the affix-chunking hypothesis, a letter search should be more difficult for a letter embedded in an affix compared with a non-affixed letter sequence because affixes have a functional significance. On the other hand, the decomposition hypothesis claims that derived (e.g., hunter) and pseudo-derived words (e.g., corner) are processed similarly, with lexical access being driven by affix stripping followed by the activation of the remaining stem to reach the mental lexicon. We conducted a letter-search task to test these hypotheses using both prefixed (e.g., détour ‘detour’), suffixed (e.g., acteur ‘actor’) words, compared with matched pseudo-prefixed (e.g., décor ‘decor’), pseudo-suffixed (e.g., fleur ‘flower’) words. Decision latencies on letter targets were compared to non-affixed words for each type of affix (e.g., drogue ‘drug’ for détour, décor and tâche ‘task’ for acteur, fleur). Our results revealed an asymmetry in the processing of suffixed versus prefixed words. While a significant facilitation effect was found for suffixed words relative to pseudo-suffixed words, no similar advantage was observed for prefixed over pseudo-prefixed words. The asymmetry in identifying letters in prefixes and suffixes is interpreted in terms of the differing functional salience of affixes in French.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • Morphological effects as emerging patterns of systematic formal-meaning overlaps
    • What does a letter-search task tell us about the processing of morphological structure?
    • The present study
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • Data availability statement
  • References
References (40)
References
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in psychology, 31, 232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Audring, J. (2021). Advances in morphological theory: construction morphology and relational morphology. Annual Review Of Linguistics, 81, 39–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., & Grainger, J. (2023). The role of embedded words and morphemes in reading. In D. Crepaldi (Ed.), Linguistic morphology in the mind and brain (pp. 26–49). (Current Issues in the Psychology of Language). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2015). Differences in the processing of prefixes and suffixes revealed by a letter-search task. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(5), 360–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, J. P. (2006). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 42(3), 531–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A. (2013). Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 3/11, 1–13, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The structure of words. In John Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word (pp. 157–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3–4), 169–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbin, D. (1999). Pour une théorie sémantique de la catégorisation affixale. In: Faits de langues, n°14, La catégorisation dans les langues. (pp. 65–77). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Hemsworth, L., Davis, C. J., & Rastle, K. (2016). Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(1), 113–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Almeida, R. G., Gallant, J., Antal, C., & Libben, G. (2024). Semantic access to ambiguous word roots cannot be stopped by affixation — Not even in sentence contexts: Evidence from eye-tracking and the maze task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H. & Francis, K. A. (2017). How children become sensitive to the morphological structure of the words that they read. Frontiers in Psychology, 81:1469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O., & Wurzel, W. U. (1987). Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35(1), 116–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Dal Maso, S. (2016a). The salience of complex words and their parts: Which comes first? Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Suffix perceptual salience in morphological masked priming. Lingue e Linguaggio, 11, 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giraudo, H., Grainger, J. (2003). A Supralexical Model for French Derivational Morphology. In: Assink, E. M. H., Sandra, D. (eds) Reading Complex Words. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 22. Springer, Boston, MA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(5), 219–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E. (2017). Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiates morpho-orthographic segmentation. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 671, pp. 285–317). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (1984). Word Grammar. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, F., Audring, J., & Jackendoff, R. (2022). Predictive processing in language: A review and framework for linguistic prediction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(1), 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S., & Audring, J. (2020). The Texture of the Lexicon: Relational Morphology in the Parallel Architecture. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korecky-Kröll, K., Dressler, W., Freiberger, E. M., Reinisch, E., Mörth, K., & Libben, G. (2014). Morphonotactic and phonotactic processing in German-speaking adults. Language Sciences, 461, 48–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). Morphological processing in visual word recognition: A review of evidence from language acquisition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(1), 58–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, G. (1994). How is morphological decomposition achieved? Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 369–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 307–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., & Smolka, E. (2017). Disentangling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing in visual word recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Psychological Research, 81(1), 141–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., & Smolka, E. (2019). Morphological systems and the structure of words. In E. A. Guerra & M. F. Sánchez (Eds.), Morphological Processing (pp. 47–75). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millin, P., Feldman, L. B., & Smolka, E. (2019). Models of lexical access and morphological processing. In The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, eds E. M. Fernández and H. S. Cairns (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell), 240–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE™//A lexical database for contemporary french: LEXIQUE™. L’année Psychologique, 101(3), 447–462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 942–971. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 111, 1090–1098. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salvadori, J., Huyghe, R. Affix polyfunctionality in French deverbal nominalizations. Morphology, 331, 1–39 (2023). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 607–620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue