Article published In: Words in the World
Edited by Laura Teddiman, Lori Buchanan and Hamad Al-Azary
[The Mental Lexicon 19:1] 2024
► pp. 126–134
The influence of semantic primes on the typing of word targets
Published online: 9 December 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24015.man
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.24015.man
Abstract
Typing is a complex activity involving identifying and encoding the to-be-typed word, planning, and executing the
keystrokes. Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain how contextual information about meaning influences the processing
of a target word (for example, semantic priming), and it is unclear how this information influences the typing output of the
target word. When the interval between the prime and target is short, the prime is thought to automatically activate the target.
With a longer interval, the facilitation may be more strategic. The influence of the prime on the output of the target may thus
depend on the interval between the two. We found that at both short and long intervals, related semantic primes facilitated the
speed of the first keystroke of the target word. However, there was no effect on how quickly the non-initial letters of the target
were entered, suggesting that information from semantic primes influences the planning and initiation of typing, but not the
execution of remaining keystrokes. Interestingly, the initial and non-initial keystrokes were faster when the interstimulus
interval was long, suggesting participants encode the letters of the prime which could interfere with encoding and typing the
target if the interval between them is short.
Article outline
- Facilitation of semantic primes
- Influence of linguistic information on keystroke latencies
- The present study
- Method
- Participants
- Stimuli and experimental design
- Procedure
- Data cleaning and analyses
- Results
- Initiation Latencies
- Continued production latencies
- Error rates
- Discussion
References
References (13)
Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic
context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory &
cognition, 8(6), 493–512.
Chen, R., Levy, R., & Eisape, T. (2021). On
factors influencing typing time: insights from a viral online typing game. Proceedings of the
Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science
Society, 431, 43. Retrieved September 11, 2023. Retrieved from [URL]
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A
spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological
review, 82(6), 407.
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2014). Conceptual
composition: Typing time as an index of morphological and semantic effects during English compound
processing. Lingue e
Linguaggio, XIII(2), 241–262.
(2016). Effects
of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in English compound and pseudocompound
words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 42(9), 1489–1495.
Hutchison, K. A., Balota, D. A., Neely, J. H., Cortese, M. J., Cohen-Shikora, E. R., Tse, C. S., … & Buchanan, E. (2013). The
semantic priming project. Behavior research
methods, 451, 1099–1114.
Libben, G., Gallant, J., & Dressler, W. U. (2021). Textual
effects in compound processing: A Window on words in the world. Frontiers in
Communication, 61, Article 646454.
Logan, G. D. (2018). Automatic
control: How experts act without thinking. Psychological
Review, 125(4), 453–485.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation
in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal
of experimental
psychology, 90(2), 227.
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic
priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic
matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 15(6), 1003.
Scaltritti, M., Arfe, B., Torrance, M., & Peressotti, F. (2016). Typing
pictures: Linguistic processing cascades into finger
movements. Cognition, 1561, 16–29.
