Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 17:2 (2022) ► pp.239–276

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

On the lexical source of variable L2 phoneme production

 | Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
 | Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Published online: 8 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.22002.joh
Abstract
The current study investigates two lexical explanations for variation in L2 production: approximate (‘fuzzy’) representations vs dual URs. The focus is on Quebec francophone (QF) production of English /θ ð/ and /h/, which a reading-aloud task shows to be highly variable. Variation is problematic for the assumption that, due to perceptual illusions, URs are inaccurate. How is accurate output generated from inaccurate URs? Approximate representations employ diacritics rather than distinctive features. Arguably, these representations do not consistently generate accurate output. Under dual URs, lexical entries contain both inaccurate URs due to initial misperceptions and accurate URs generated when learners become capable of perceiving L2 phonemes. These URs compete for selection, leading to variation. Perception findings from oddball and semantic incongruity tasks provide conflicting support for the explanations: perception is variable, as predicted under approximate representations; but typical L2→L1 substitutions are harder to detect than atypical L1→L2 substitutions, an asymmetry expected under dual URs. To resolve the contradiction, we reinterpret the latter findings as revealing an implicit strategy of corrective adjustment acquired through experience with L2 errors. While we conclude that the L2 lexicon employs approximate representations, an enduring enigma concerns the considerably higher rates of hypercorrect [h] than [θ ð].
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Data collection
    • Task 1 (production – reading aloud)
    • Task 2 (perception – oddball paradigm)
    • Task 3 (perception – semantic incongruity)
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • Task 1 (production – reading aloud)
    • Task 2 (perception – oddball paradigm)
    • Task 3 (perception – semantic incongruity)
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Anttila, A. (1997). Deriving variation from grammar: A study of Finnish genitives. In F. Hinskens, R. Van Hout, & L. Wetzels (Eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory (pp. 935–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Variation and phonological theory. In J. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change (pp. 206–43). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 21. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 43–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279–304). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, T. G. (2006). Spanish rhotics and Dominican hypercorrect /s/. Probus, 18(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 1061, 707–729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brannen, K. (2011). The perception and production of interdental fricatives in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
Broselow, E., Chen, S.-I., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 201, 261–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, C. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the acquisition of L2 segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14(2), 136–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso, W. (2007). The variable development of English word-final stops by Brazilian Portuguese speakers: A stochastic optimality theoretic account. Language Variation and Change, 191, 219–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The development of coda perception in second language phonology: A variationist perspective. Second Language Research, 27(4), 433–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. J., & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50(2), 333–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, C. M. (2002). Perceptual adjustment to foreign-accented English with short term exposure. In the proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2002), 253–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 341, 269–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 134(2), 222–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, S. (2011). Geminates. In M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume E., & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Volume 2 (pp. 837–859). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickerson, L. J. (1975). The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly, 9(4), 401–408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 251, 1568–1578.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(4), 551–585. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 345–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 341, 65–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, G. R. (2007). Lexical exceptions in variable phonology. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 13(2), 109–119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, R. D., & Auger, J. (1992). Quantitative evidence, qualitative hypercorrection, sociolinguistic variables – and French speakers’ ‘eadhaches with English h/Ø. Language & Communication, 12(3/4), 195–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John, P. (2006). Variable h-epenthesis in the interlanguage of francophone ESL learners. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Concordia University.
John, P., & Cardoso, W. (2009). Francophone ESL learners’ difficulties with English /h/. In M. A. Watkins, A. S. Rauber, & B. O. Baptista (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production (pp. 118–140). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Medial coda and final stops in Brazilian Portuguese-English contact. In Yavaş, M., Kehoe, M. & Cardoso, W. (Eds.), Romance-Germanic bilingual phonology (pp. 181–199). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: the role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 64(3), 459–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, A. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 11, 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaCharité, D., & Prévost, P. (1999). The role of L1 and of teaching in the acquisition of English sounds by francophones. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Taro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 373–385). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mah, J. (2011). Segmental representations in interlanguage grammars: the case of francophones and English /h/. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
Mah, J., Goad, H., & Steinhauer, K. (2016). Using event-related brain potentials to assess perceptibility: the case of French speakers and English [h]. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 321, 543–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melnik, G. A., & Pepercamp, S. (2019). Perceptual deletion and asymmetric lexical access in second language learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(13). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. (1989). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, S. (1994). The ins and outs of paragoge and apocope in Japanese-English interphonology. Second Language Research, 10(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners. In J. G. Hansen-Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2007). A dynamic look at L2 phonological learning: Seeking processing explanations for implicational phenomena. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 291, 407–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & John, P. (2011). When three equals tree: Examining the nature of phonological entries in L2 lexicons of Quebec speakers of English. In P. Trofimovich & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trude, A. M., Tremblay, A., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2013). Limitations on adaptation to foreign accents. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 501, 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, E. J., Titone, D., Genesee, F., & Steinhauer, K. (2015). Phonological processing in late second language learners: The effects of proficiency and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winford, D. (1978). Phonological hypercorrection in the process of decreolization – the case of Trinidadian English. Journal of Linguistics, 14(2), 277–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Darcy, Isabelle, Miquel Llompart, Rachel Hayes-Harb, Joan C. Mora, Miren Adrian, Svetlana Cook & Mirjam Ernestus
2025. Phonological processing and the L2 mental lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 47:1 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
John, Paul, Carol Johnson & Walcir Cardoso
2025. Exploring automatic speech recognition for corrective and confirmative pronunciation feedback. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 11:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Mora, Joan C.
2025. Phonological acquisition in instructed SLA: L2 pronunciation training in and beyond the classroom and individual differences. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Archibald, John
2023. Differential substitution: a contrastive hierarchy account. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2 DOI logo
Archibald, John
2024. Phonological features and phonetic variation in multilingual grammars. In Multilingual Acquisition and Learning [Studies in Bilingualism, 67], ► pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
John, Paul & Simon Rigoulot
2023. On the representation of /h/ by Quebec francophone learners of English. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue