Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 18:2 (2023) ► pp.265–299

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Accessing the semantic and lexical information of constituents while typing compounds

ORCiD logo with link | Concordia University of Edmonton
 | University of Alberta
 | University of Alberta
Published online: 14 December 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.21005.tai
Abstract
A key question in research concerning the typing production of morphologically complex words is whether the whole multimorphemic word is output ballistically or whether individual constituents are accessed during typing. To address this question, we examined keystroke latencies during the production of English compounds (e.g., snowball) to test whether the initiation and continued typing of each constituent (e.g., snow and ball) are influenced by its linguistic properties (length, frequency, and semantic transparency). Participants identified and then typed a compound word. We found that the initiation and continued typing of each constituent was influenced by the linguistic properties of that constituent. However, the linguistic properties of the second constituent also influenced the typing latency of the final letter of the first constituent, suggesting that production of the first constituent overlapped with accessing and planning the keystrokes of the second constituent. The influence of the linguistic properties of the first constituent on its own initiation and continued typing suggests that accessing and planning the keystrokes of the first constituent occurred as the compound word was being identified. Our findings indicate that individual constituents are accessed during production and influence the typing of compound words.
Article outline
  • Modular and interactive theories of typing
  • Linguistic factors of constituent morphemes that influence processing of multimorphemic words
  • Present experiment
  • Method
    • Materials
    • Data Cleaning and Analyses
  • Results
    • Initiation and continued typing of the first constituent
    • Boundary effect
    • Continued typing of the second constituent
  • Discussion
    • Constituent versus compound effects on initiation and production of the constituents
    • Second constituent effects on the first constituent and the boundary effect
    • Implications
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 94–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 615–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Kezilas, Y., Coltheart, M., Castles, A., Ziegler, J. C., Taft, M., & Grainger, J. (2018). Taking the book from the bookshelf: Masked constituent priming effects from compound words and nonwords. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bien, H., Levelt, W. J. M., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(49), 17876–17881. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burani, C., Salmaso, D., & Caramazza, A. (1984). Morphological structure and lexical access. Visible Language, 181, 342–352.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2004). The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 203–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Dale, R., & van Rij, J. (2019). Lexical and frequency effects on keystroke timing: Challenges to a lexical search account from a type-to-copy task. Frontiers in Communication, 41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2014). Typing time as an index of morphological and semantic effects during English compound processing. Lingue e Linguaggio, 13(2), 241–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016a). Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in English compound and pseudocompound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(9), 1489–1495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Written production of English compounds: effects of morphology and semantic transparency. Morphology, 26(2), 133–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., Nisbet, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2018). Pseudo-morphemic structure inhibits, but morphemic structure facilitates, processing of a repeated free morpheme. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(10), 1252–1274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., & Schmidtke, D. (2019). LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2152–2179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagné, C., Spalding, T. L., & Taikh, A. (2023). Impact of morphology on written word production: An overview of empirical evidence and theoretical implications. In D. Crepaldi (Ed.), Current Issues in the Psychology of Language: Linguistic Morphology in the Mind and Brain. Routledge, 96–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E. (2017). Edge-aligned embedded word activation initiations morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 671, 285–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inhoff, A. W. (1991). Word Frequency During Copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 171, 478–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2004). Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora. In Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers (Vol. 36, Issue 3, pp. 388–396). Psychonomic Society Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kandel, S., Álvarez, C. J., & Vallée, N. (2006). Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 18–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehtönen, M., Cunillera, T., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Hultén, A., Tuomainen, J., & Laine, M. (2007). Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1148(1), 123–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Koester, D., & Schreuder, R. (2011). When bicycle pump is harder to read than bicycle bell: effects of parsing cues in first and second language compound reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010 18:2, 18(2), 364–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, G., & Weber, S. (2014). Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables. In F. Rainer, W. Dressler, F. Gardani, & H. C. Luschutzky (Eds.), Morphology and meaning. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Logan, G. D. (2018). Automatic control: How experts act without thinking. Psychological Review, 125(4), 453–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2009). The left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing: The disruptive effects of attention to the hands in skilled typewriting: Research article. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1296–1300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Hierarchical Control of Cognitive Processes. The Case for Skilled Typewriting. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation – Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 541). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., Weingarten, R., & Will, U. (2005). Syllabic structures in typing: Evidence from deaf writers. Reading and Writing, 181, 497–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinet, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Alario, F. X. (2016). Typing is writing: Linguistic properties modulate typing execution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 231, 1898–1906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roelofs, A. (1998). Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production: Verb-particle combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 904–921. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roelofs, A., & Baayen, H. (2002). Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(1), 132–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sahel, S., Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., & Weingarten, R. (2008). Written production of German compounds: Effects of lexical frequency and semantic transparency. Written Language & Literacy, 11(2), 211–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (1986). Perceptual, cognitive, and motoric aspects of transcription typing. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 303–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scaltritti, M., Arfé, B., Torrance, M., & Peressotti, F. (2016). Typing pictures: Linguistic processing cascades into finger movements. Cognition, 1561, 16–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. [URL]
(1989). Reading Complex Words. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics (7th ed., pp. 53–105). Springer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 263–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon, 1(2), 183–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taikh, A., Gagne, C., & Spalding, T. L. (in press). Influence of the constituent morpheme boundary on compound word access. Memory and Cognition.
Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U. (2004). Morphemes, syllables, and graphemes in written word production. Trends in lingustics studies and monographs, 1571, 529–572.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Will, U., Nottbusch, G., & Weingarten, R. (2006). Linguistic units in word typing. Written Language & Literacy Written Language and Literacy, 9(1), 153–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weingarten, R. (2005). Subsyllabic units in written word production. Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 43–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M., & Logan, G. D. (2014). Pushing typists back on the learning curve: Revealing chunking in skilled typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(2), 592–612. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Pushing typists back on the learning curve: Memory chunking in the hierarchical control of skilled typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(12), 1919–1936. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gow, Keira, Alexander Taikh & Morshedul Islam
2024. The influence of uppercase letter location on typing multiword passphrases. The Mental Lexicon 19:1 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Park, Juana, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
2024. Is there a hip or a pie in hippie?. The Mental Lexicon 19:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue