Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:2/3 (2021) ► pp.240–270

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Morphophonological activation in Chinese word recognition

Evidence from heteronymic characters

 | Hong Kong Baptist University
Published online: 8 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.21003.tsa
Abstract
The role of morphophonology during Chinese visual word recognition was investigated in three masked priming lexical decision experiments. The primes and targets were Cantonese Chinese bimorphemic words. In Chinese, most characters correspond to morphemes, but sometimes the mapping between character and morpheme is not one-to-one. Specifically, some characters are heteronymic, which had one visual form associated with multiple pronunciations and meanings (e.g., “長” is pronounced as /coeng4/ and /zoeng2/ in Cantonese, which means “long” and “senior”, respectively). In Experiment 1, facilitative priming was found when the primes and targets shared heteronymic characters of identical (e.g., “長遠-long term” /coeng4jyun5/ and “長短-length” /coeng4dyun2/), but not a different, pronunciation (e.g., “長官-senior official” /zoeng2gun1/). Sharing word-level phonology only (e.g., “場景-scene” /coeng4ging2/) had no effects. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1, and further indicated that the effects could not be attributed to sharing word-level meanings (e.g., “即時-immediate” /zik1si4/). Experiment 3 compared the priming effects produced by the two alternative pronunciations of the heteronymic characters. The results showed that the strength of priming was statistically comparable in the two pronunciation-congruent conditions. Together, this study provided evidence that morphophonology was activated to facilitate the ambiguity resolution of heteronymic characters. The lemma model was modified to accommodate the results.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Experiment 1
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Results and discussion
  • Experiment 2
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Results and discussion
  • Experiment 3
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Results and discussion
  • General discussion
  • Limitations and future studies
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Allen, M., & Badecker, W. (1999). Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multilevel lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 41 1, 105–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in psychology, 3 1, 232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2015). The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41 1, 1587–1596.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 1, 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 1, 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even for inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74 1, B13–B25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Harald, R. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 1, 489–511.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65 1, 1798–1819. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10 1, 645–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5 1, e10729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H. C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8 1, 511–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen-Goldberg, A. M., Cholin, J., Miozzo, M., & Rapp, B. (2013). The interface between morphology and phonology: Exploring a morpho-phonological deficit in spoken production. Cognition, 127 1, 270–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2010). Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O’Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martin (2009). Psychonomic bulletin & review, 17 1, 749–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20 1, 75–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 1, 1002–1020. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A. & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16 1, 684–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon, 4 1, 159–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35 1, 116–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 1, 829–856.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8 1, 127–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 1, 323–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyönä, J., Heikkilä, T., Vainio, S., & Kliegl, R. (2021). Parafoveal access to word stem during reading: An eye movement study. Cognition, 208 1, 104547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyönä, J., Yan, M., & Vainio, S. (2018). Morphological structure influences the initial landing position in words during reading Finnish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71 1, 122–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 1, 434–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software, 82 1, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 1, 866–877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leybaert, J., & Alegría, J. (1995). Spelling development in deaf and hearing children: Evidence for use of morpho-phonological regularities in French. Reading and Writing, 7 1, 89–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2003 1, 313–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49 1, 1494–1502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marelli, M., & Baroni, M. (2015). Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122 1, 485–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101 1, 3–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of memory and language, 94 1, 305–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2013). Tracking the consequences of morpho-orthographic decomposition using ERPs. Brain Research, 1529 1, 92–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 1, 942–971. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15 1, 507–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 1, 1090–1098. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Research Centre for Humanities Computing (2003). Chinese character database: With word-formations. Retrieved from [URL]
Shen, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2018). The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71 1, 131–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 1, 271–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25 1, 277–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2013a). Early morphological processing is sensitive to morphemic meanings: Evidence from processing ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 1, 223–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: Evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39 1, 1990–2001.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Activation of morphemic meanings in processing opaque words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21 1, 1281–1286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsang, Y. K., Huang, J., Lui, M., Xue, M., Chan, Y. W. F., Wang, S., & Chen, H. C. (2018). MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 50 1, 1763–1777. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tse, C. S., Yap, M. J., Chan, Y. L., Sze, W. P., Shaoul, C., & Lin, D. (2017). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods, 49 1, 1503–1519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135 1, 452–477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, A. W. K., Wu, Y. & Chen, H. C. (2014). Limited role of phonology in reading Chinese two-character compounds: Evidence from an ERP study. Neuroscience. 256 1, 342–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W. K., & Chen, H. C. (2017). The processing of homographic morphemes in Chinese: an ERP study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32 1, 102–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, J., & Taft, M. (2014). Solely soles: Inter-lemma competition in inflected word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 76 1, 127–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D., Krügel, A., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition, 132 1, 181–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 1, 1245–1265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, Orthography, and Phonology Reading Chinese Compound Words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 1, 525–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Chen, Huilin, Xu Xu, Haiquan Li, Xinyue Yu, Ruting Pan & Zhaoyang Zhang
2024. A database of ambiguous Chinese characters with measures for meaning dominance and meaning balance. Applied Psycholinguistics 45:4 ► pp. 695 ff. DOI logo
Tsang, Yiu-Kei, Jian Huang, Suiping Wang, Jie Wang & Andus Wing-Kuen Wong
2024. Comparing word recognition in simplified and traditional Chinese: A megastudy approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 77:3 ► pp. 593 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue