Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:2/3 (2021) ► pp.362–396

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Word order effect in collocation processing

 | Vilnius University
 | University of Nottingham
Published online: 8 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20022.vil
Abstract
Collocations are words associated because of their frequent co-occurrence, which makes them predictable and leads to facilitated processing. While there have been suggestions that collocations are stored as unanalysed chunks, other researchers disagree. One of the arguments against holistic storage is the fact that collocations are not fixed phrases, for example, their word order can vary. To explore whether reversed collocations retain the processing advantage that they have in their canonical form, we conducted two primed lexical decision experiments: Experiment 1 in English, and Experiment 2 in Lithuanian, an understudied language. We presented both forward and backward collocations and compared them to matched control phrases. We also explored which collocational measure (phrasal frequency, MI, t-score, or ΔP) worked as the best predictor of processing speed. We found a clear priming effect for both languages when collocations were presented in their forward form, which is in line with previous research. There was no priming for the backward condition in English, but a priming effect for it in Lithuanian, where the reversed word order is acceptable albeit marked. These results are not easily explained by holistic storage. As far as collocational measures are concerned, they all seem to perform reasonably well, with none of them being clearly better than the others.
Article outline
  • Processing advantage for collocation
  • Question of holistic storage
  • Directionality
    • The present study
  • Experiment 1
    • Participants
    • Stimuli
    • Procedure
    • Analysis
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • Experiment 2
    • Participants
    • Stimuli
    • Analysis
    • Results
    • Comparing different collocational measures
    • Discussion
  • General discussion
    • Holistic storage
    • Collocational measures
  • Limitations
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (59)
References
Altenberg, B. (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (pp. 101–122). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barfield, A., & Gyllstad, H. (2009). Introduction: Researching L2 Collocation Knowledge and Development. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barton, K. (2015). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package (1.13.4) [Computer software]. [URL]
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package (1.1–7) [Computer software]. [URL]>
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bielinskienė, A., Boizou, L., Bumbulienė, I., Kovalevskaitė, J., Krilavičius, T., Mandravickaitė, J., Rimkutė, E., & Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. (2019). Lietuvių kalbos kolokacijų žodynas [elektroninis išteklius].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonk, W., & Healy, A. F. (2005). Priming effects without semantic or associative links through collocation. 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto, Canada.
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (2), 139–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caldwell-Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2008). Fast Pairs: A visual word recognition paradigm for measuring entrenchment, top-down effects, and subjective phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, 17 (4), 1063–1081. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2020). Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences. Language and Speech, 63 (1), 95–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahlmann, I., & Adolphs, S. (2007). Pauses as an indicator of psycholinguistically valid multi-word expressions (MWEs)? MWE ’07 Proceedings of the Workshop on a Broader Perspective on Multiword Expressions, Pages 49–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2019). The grammar network. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A. (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6 (2), 125–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Simpson-Vlach, R. (2009). Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 61–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin, S. M. (1961). Changes with Age in the Verbal Determinants of Word-Association. The American Journal of Psychology, 74 (3), 361–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferraro, G., Nazar, R., Ramos, M. A., & Wanner, L. (2014). Towards advanced collocation error correction in Spanish learner corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 48 (1), 45–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research: Identifying, Comparing, and Interpreting the Evidence. Language Learning, 67 (S1), 155–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González, A. O., & Ramos, M. A. (2013). A comparative study of collocations in a native corpus and a learner corpus of Spanish. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95 1, 563–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2013). 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next …. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18 (1), 137–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical Measures for Usage-Based Linguistics. Language Learning, 65 (S1), 228–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Handl, S. (2008). Essential collocations for learners of English. Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, 43–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002). Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (pp. 167–186). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchison, K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10 (4), 785–813. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2013). Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, N., & Nekrasova, T. M. (2007). The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (3), 433–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, S., Jiang, X., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2020). The processing of multiword expressions in children and adults: An eye-tracking study of Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41 (4), 901–931. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahan, T. A., Neely, J. H., & Forsythe, W. J. (1999). Dissociated backward priming effects in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6 (1), 105–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, G. R., Milroy, C., & Piper, J. (1973). An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey, & N. Hamilton-Smith (Eds.), The Computer and Literary Studies. University Press. [URL]
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Bojesen Christensen, B. (2015). lmerTest: Tests in Linear mixed effects models (2.0–29) [Computer software]. [URL]>
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44 (2), 325–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McConnell, K., & Blumenthal-Dramé, A. (2019). Effects of task and corpus-derived association scores on the online processing of collocations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1 1(ahead-of-print). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003a). Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements. Vision Research, 43 (16), 1735–1751. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003b). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14 (6), 648–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Canal, P., Vespignani, F., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C. (2013). Are complex function words processed as semantically empty strings? A reading time and ERP study of collocational complex prepositions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (6), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162 (1), 8–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 55 (4), 1339–1362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, F. (2019). Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis. Philosophy Compass, 14 (11), e12633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2017). Linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 435–452). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015a). On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language: Corpus linguistics and Linguistic theory. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11 (2), 285–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System, 53 1, 148–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Martinez, R. (2015). The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics, 549–569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonbul, S. (2015). Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (03), 419–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spina, S. (2010). The Dici Project: Towards a Dictionary of Italian Collocations integrated with an online language learning platform. ELexicography in the 21st Century: New Challenges, New Applications, 2731.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1998). Effects of semantic and associative relatedness on automatic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 38 (4), 440–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it. An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use (pp. 153–172). John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Utka, A.; Rimkutė, E.; Kovalevskaitė, J.; Bielinskienė, A.; Petkevičius, M.; Petrauskaitė, R., & Mikelionienė, J. (2017). Corpus of the Contemporary Lithuanian Language, CLARIN-LT digital library in the Republic of Lithuania, [URL].
Vilkaitė, L. (2016). Are non-adjacent collocations processed faster? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42 (10), 1632–1642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. (2019). First steps towards the Lithuanian word association database. Taikomoji kalbotyra, 12, 226–258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32 (4), 430–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (03), 451–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32 1, 231–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, L., Yasunaga, D., & Kojima, H. (2021). Similarities and differences between native and non-native speakers’ processing of formulaic sequences: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (2), 397–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Hong, Wei & Le Ma
2025. Where does the processing advantage of collocations come from? Evidence from L1 and L2 speakers’ eye movements on adjacent and non-adjacent collocations. System 132 ► pp. 103724 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Tamara Marie & Simone Eveline Pfenninger
2025. How Synonymic Taste Words Alter Perceived Taste in American Consumers. Languages 10:6 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Li, Wanyin, Bene Bassetti & Steven Frisson
2025. Changes in word order do not eliminate the collocation advantage: An eye-tracking study of L1 and L2 speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pérez Serrano, Mercedes & Matías Hidalgo Gallardo
2025. El papel de la variación flexiva verbal en el procesamiento de las colocaciones léxicas verbo + nombre en español como lengua adicional. ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante :43 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Yamagata, Satoshi, Gareth Carrol & Crayton Walker
2025. Exploring the potential of multiple CORE meanings in learning L2 verb-noun collocations: A corpus-based discovery learning approach. Applied Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 100166 ff. DOI logo
Ramonienė, Meilutė
2024. Development of Applied Linguistics. Lietuvių kalba ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Szudarski, Paweł
2023. Collocations, Corpora and Language Learning, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. . Experimental and Clinical Transplantation 23:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue