Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 15:3 (2020) ► pp.464–484
Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?
Published online: 22 January 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw
Abstract
Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the
word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue
transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or
syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1
respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue
transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely
to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the
cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.
Keywords: word association, transitivity, grammatical class, co-occurrence, semantics
Article outline
- Previous research on transitivity and lexical processing
- Investigating the influence of cue transitivity
- Predictions
- Method
- Cue selection
- Categorization of data
- Results
- Grammatical class of responses
- Response categorisation
- Response distribution
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (36)
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., & Đurđević, D. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 1181, 428–481.
Brown, R., & Berko, J. (1960). Word Association and the Acquisition of Grammar. Child Development, 31(1), 1–14.
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911.
Category: English intransitive verbs (n.d.). In Wiktionary. Retrieved 14th August 2017. [URL]
Charles, W. G., & Miller, G. A. (1989). Contexts of antonymous adjectives. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10(03), 357–375.
Clark, H. H. (1970). Word Associations and linguistic theory. In New Horizons in Linguistics (pp. 271–286). Penguin.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 2nd1, p. 567).
De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. (2008). Word associations: network and semantic properties. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 213–231.
de Groot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 824–845.
DeDe, G. (2014). Verb Transitivity Bias Affects On-line Sentence Reading in People with Aphasia. Aphasiology, 27(3), 326–343.
Deese, J. (1962). Form class and the determinants of association. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 79–84.
Entwisle, D. R. (1966). Form Class and Children’s Word Associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 51, 558–565.
Ervin, S. M. (1961). Changes with Age in the Verbal Determinants of Word-Association. The American Journal of Psychology, 74(3), 361–372.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2006). Habits and Rabbits: Word associations and the L2 lexicon. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Medved Krajnovic, & J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 61 (pp. 121–145).
(2007). Word association patterns: unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 319–331.
Fitzpatrick, T., Playfoot, D., Wray, A., & Wright, M. J. (2015). Establishing the Reliability of Word Association Data for Investigating Individual and Group Differences. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 23–50.
Guida, A., & Lenci, A. (2007). Semantic properties of word associations to Italian verbs. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 191(2007), 293–326.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. In Language (Vol. 56, Issue 2, pp. 251–299).
Jakubíček, M., Kilgariff, A., & Kovář, V. (2013). The tenten corpus family. Proceedings of the 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference.
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D. (2000). Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production. In J. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 229–254). John Hopkins Press.
Kang, B. (2018). Collocation and word association: Comparing collocation measuring methods. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(1), 85–113.
Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 441, 978–990.
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 921, 57–78.
McRae, K., Khalkhali, S., & Hare, M. (2012). Semantic and Associative Relations in Adolescents and Young Adults: Examining A Tenuous Dichotomy. In V. F. Reyna, S. B. Chapman, M. R. Dougherty, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The Adolescent Brain: Learning, Reasoning, and Decision Making (pp. 39–66). American Psychological Association.
Nissen, H. B., & Henriksen, B. (2006). Word class influence on word association test results. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 389–408.
Polzella, D. J., & Rohrman, N. L. (1970). Psychological aspects of transitive verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 537–540.
Spence, D. P., & Owens, K. C. (1990). Lexical co-occurrence and association strength. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(5), 317–330.
Theakston, A., Lieven, E., Pine, J., & Rowland, C. (2001). The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Journal of Child Language, 281, 127–152.
Thwaites, P. (2019a). Are Grammatical Class Effects on L1 Word Association Responses Independent of Cue Frequency, Age-of-acquisition, and Concreteness? Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 35.2, 105–33.
(2019b). “Lexical and Distributional Influences on Word Association Response Generation.” Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cardiff University.
(Submitted). What explains weak correlations between word association and corpus co-occurrence? Manuscript submitted for publication.
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 671(January 2015), 1176–1190.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Buerki, Andreas
Thwaites, Peter
2022. Exploring the impact of lexical context on word association responses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 321 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
