Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp.23–48

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Relative entropy effects on the processing of spoken Romanian verbs

ORCiD logo with link | University of Alberta
ORCiD logo with link | University of Birmingham
ORCiD logo with link | University of Alberta
Published online: 8 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20010.nen
Abstract
A multitude of studies show the relevance of both inflectional paradigms (word form frequency distributions, i.e., inflectional entropy) and inflectional classes (whole class frequency distributions) for visual lexical processing. Their interplay has also been proven significant, measured as the difference between paradigm and class frequency distributions (relative entropy). Relative entropy effects have now been recorded in nouns, verbs, adjectives, and prepositional phrases. However, all of these studies used visual stimuli – either written words or picture-naming tasks. The goal of our study is to test whether the effects of relative entropy can also be captured in the auditory modality. Forty young native speakers of Romanian (60% female) living in Serbia as part of the Romanian ethnic minority participated in an auditory lexical decision task. Stimuli were 168 Romanian verbs from two inflectional classes. Verbs were presented in four forms: present and imperfect 1st person singular, present 3rd person plural, and imperfect 2nd person plural. The results show that relative entropy influences both response accuracy and response latency. We discuss alternative operationalizations of relative entropy and how they can help us test hypotheses about the structure of the mental lexicon.
Article outline
  • Inflectional and relative entropy
  • The current study
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Stimuli
    • Procedure
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • Response accuracy
    • Response latency
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Author note
  • References
References (48)
References
Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 290–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2005). Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81(3), 666–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74(2), B13–B25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, J. P. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language, 79(4), 737–767. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Box, G. E., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 261, 211–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ek, U., Fellenius, K., & Jacobson, L. (2003). Reading acquisition, cognitive and visual development, and self-esteem in four children with cerebral visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(12), 741–754. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Cutler, A. (2015). BALDEY: A database of auditory lexical decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1469–1488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Warner, N. (2011). An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics, 39(SI), 253–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrand, L., Méot, A., Spinelli, E., New, B., Pallier, C., Bonin, P., Dufau, S., Mathôt, S., & Grainger, J. (2018). MEGALEX: A megastudy of visual and auditory word recognition. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1285–1307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipović Đurđević, D., & Gatarić, I. (2018). Simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes in processing of Serbian verbs. Psihologija, 51(3), 259–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipović Đurđević, D., & Milin, P. (2019). Information and learning in processing adjective inflection. Cortex, 1161, 209–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goh, W. D., Yap, M. J., Lau, M. C., Ng, M. M., & Tan, L.-C. (2016). Semantic richness effects in spoken word recognition: A lexical decision and semantic categorization megastudy. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 976. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Auditory lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), 559–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gönczöl, R. (2007). Romanian: An essential grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, J. B., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 342–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendrix, P., Bolger, P., & Baayen, H. (2017). Distinct ERP signatures of word frequency, phrase frequency, and prototypicality in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10(2–3), 210–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemps, R., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2004). Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 117–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Megastudies, crowdsourcing, and large datasets in psycholinguistics: An overview of recent developments. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1457–1468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kostić, A., Marković, T., & Baucal, A. (2003). Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative cognitive domains? In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 1–44). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2011). Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 952.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindgren, S.-A., & Laine, M. (2011). Multilingual dyslexia in university students: Reading and writing patterns in three languages. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(9), 753–766. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorentzen, P., Nenadić, F., Kelley, M. C., & Tucker, B. V. (2019). Massive auditory lexical decision: Investigating performance in noisy environments. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Mental Lexicon, 1–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magnuson, J. S., Mirman, D., & Harris, H. D. (2012). Computational models of spoken word recognition. In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & KenMcRae (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 76–103). Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project. Behavior Research Methods, 521, 741–760. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milin, P., Filipović Ðurđević, D., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 50–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 558–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 231, 299–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Podlubny, R. G., Nearey, T. M., Kondrak, G., & Tucker, B. V. (2018). Assessing the importance of several acoustic properties to the perception of spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(4), 2255–2268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User’s guide. Psychology Software Incorporated.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 263–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, B. V., Brenner, D., Danielson, D. K., Kelley, M. C., Nenadić, F., & Sims, M. (2019). The massive auditory lexical decision (MALD) database. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1187–1204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tufiş, D., Ion, R., Ceauşu, A., & Ştefănescu, D. (2008). RACAI’s Linguistic Web Services. Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference – LREC, 28–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rij, J., Wieling, M., Baayen, R. H., & van Rijn, H. (2017). itsadug: Interpreting Time Series and Autocorrelated Data Using GAMMs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Scharenborg, O. (2012). Models of spoken-word recognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(3), 387–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73(1), 3–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 452–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue