Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp.69–97
Priming Maltese plurals
Representation of sound and broken plurals in the mental lexicon
Published online: 8 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20008.nie
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20008.nie
Abstract
We investigate the storage and processing of sound and broken plural forms in the Maltese lexicon by means of a cross-modal priming study. The results show no significant differences in reaction time between sound and broken plurals, but indicate a different priming effect for sound than for broken plurals. We argue that the different priming effect is a result of the phonological overlap between sound singulars and their corresponding plurals forms, while broken singulars and their plurals do not share the same phonological structure. Our results support a single-mechanism model of morphological processing in which both frequency of pattern and morphophonological similarity interact.
Article outline
- Studying storage in the mental lexicon
- Hypotheses
- Maltese plurals
- Methodology
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results
- Statistical analysis
- Coding of variables
- Results: First LMER Model – Testing the Dual-Mechanism account
- Results: Second LMER Model – testing the single mechanism account
- Discussion
- General discussion & conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (54)
Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90(2), 119–161.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Berent, I., Marcus, G., Shimron, J., & Gafos, A. (2002). The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation. Cognition, 83(2), 113–139.
Berent, I., & Pinker, S. (2007). The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon, 2(2), 129–181.
Berent, I., Pinker, S., & Shimron, J. (2002). The nature of regularity and irregularity: Evidence from Hebrew nominal inflection. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 459–502.
Camilleri, J. J. (2013). A computational grammar and lexicon for Maltese. [Master Thesis, University of Gothenburg]. [URL]
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 991–1060.
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G. F. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45(3), 225–255.
Daelemans, W. (2002). A comparison of analogical modeling to memory-based language processing. In R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. B. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling (pp. 157–179). Benjamins.
Dawdy-Hesterberg, L. G., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2014). Learnability and generalisation of Arabic broken plural nouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(10), 1268–1282.
Drake, S. (2018a). The form and productivity of the Maltese morphological diminutive. Morphology, 281, 297–323.
(2018b). L1 biases in learning root-and-pattern morphology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. [URL]
Draxler, C., & Jänsch, K. (2004). SpeechRecorder – a Universal Platform Independent Multi-Channel Audio Recording Software. Proc. of LREC, 559–562.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 101, 680–698.
Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(2), 211–251.
Gatt, A., & Čéplö, S. (2013). Digital corpora and other electronic resources for Maltese. In A. Hardie & R. Love (Eds.), Corpus linguistics (p. 96–97). Lancaster: UCREL.
Geary, J., & Ussishkin, A. (2018). Root-letter priming in Maltese visual word recognition. The Mental Lexicon, 131, 1–25.
Hay, J. B., & Baayen, H. R. (2005). Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 342–348.
Kielar, A., Joanisse, M. F., & Hare, M. L. (2008). Priming English past tense verbs: Rules or statistics? Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 327–346.
Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Prasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever out to center field. Cognitive Science (15), 173–218.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
Lück, M., Hahne, A., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Research, 10771, 144–152.
Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive psychology, 29(3), 189–256.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(11), 428–435.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33.
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. S. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8(2), 209–283.
Meunier, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(4), 561–580.
Nakisa, R., Plunkett, K., & Hahn, U. (2001). Single-and dual-route models of inflectional morphology. In P. Broeder & J. Murre (Eds.), Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches (pp. 201–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nieder, J., van de Vijver, R., & Mitterer, H. (2020). Knowledge of Maltese singular-plural mappings. Analogy explains it best. Morphology.
Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B. (2002). Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological faciliation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 244–249.
Peirce, J., Gray, J., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindelov, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behaviour Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203.
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28(1–2), 73–193.
Post, B., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2008). The processing of English regular inflections: Phonological cues to morphological structure. Cognition, 109(1), 1–17.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria.
Royle, P., Beritognolo, G., & Bergeron, E. (2012). Regularity, sub-regularity and irregularity in French acquisition. In T. Stolz, H. Otsuka, A. Urdze, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Irregularity in morphology (and beyond) (p. 227). Akademie Verlag Berlin.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 961, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S., & Plaut, D. C. (2014). Quasiregularity and its discontents: The legacy of the past tense debate. Cognitive Science, 381, 1190–1228.
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 721, 203–236.
Spagnol, M. (2011). A Tale of Two Morphologies: Verb structure and argument alternations in Maltese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Konstanz]. [URL]
Twist, A. E. (2006). A Psycholinguistic Investigation of the Verbal Morphology of Maltese. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. [URL]
van de Vijver, R., & Baer-Henney, D. (2014). Developing biases. Frontiers in Psychology – Section Language Sciences, 51, Article 634.
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport, 8(4), 957–962.
Wray, S. C. (2016). Decomposability and the effects of morpheme frequency in lexical access. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. [URL]
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Vella, Michela
Komar, Gesa Fee, Axel Buchner, Laura Mieth, Ruben van de Vijver & Raoul Bell
Nieder, Jessica, Ruben van de Vijver & Adam Ussishkin
Nieder, Jessica, Fabian Tomaschek & Simon Grima
Nieder, Jessica, Ruben van de Vijver & Fabian Tomaschek
Xu, Lily, Elizabeth Solá-Llonch, Huilei Wang & Megha Sundara
2023. A meta-analytic review of morphological priming in Semitic languages. The Mental Lexicon 18:2 ► pp. 300 ff.
Garcia, Guilherme Duarte & Natália Brambatti Guzzo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
