Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:1 (2021) ► pp.133–164

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Testing the storage of prosody-induced phonetic detail via auditory lexical decision

A case study of noun/verb homophones

 | Universität Leipzig
 | University of Alberta
Published online: 8 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.19025.loh
Abstract
This article reports the results of an auditory lexical decision task, testing the processing of phonetic detail of English noun/verb conversion pairs. The article builds on recent findings showing that the frequent occurrence in certain prosodic environments may lead to the storage of prosody-induced phonetic detail as part of the lexical representation. To investigate this question with noun/verb conversion pairs, ambicategorical stimuli were used that exhibit systematic occurrence differences with regard to prosodic environment, as indicated by either a strong verb-bias, e.g., talk (N/V) or a strong noun-bias, e.g., voice (N/V). The auditory lexical decision task tests whether acoustic properties reflecting either the typical or the atypical prosodic environment impact the processing of recordings of the stimuli. In doing so assumptions about the storage of prosody-induced phonetic detail are tested that distinguish competing model architectures. The results are most straightforwardly accounted for within an abstractionist architecture, in which the acoustic signal is mapped onto a representation that is based on the canonical pronunciation of the word.
Article outline
  • 1.The storage of phonetic detail
    • 1.1Prosody and lexical representation
    • 1.2The present study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Creation of stimuli
    • 2.3Acoustic analysis of stimuli
    • 2.4Procedure
    • 2.5Modeling reaction times and accuracy
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (42)
References
Baayen, H. R., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (2001). WebCelex. Online resource. Retrieved from [URL]
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL]
Black, M., & Chiat, S. (2003). Noun-verb dissociations: a multi-faceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 161, 231–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blazej, L. J., & Cohen-Goldberg, A. M. (2015). Can we hear morphological complexity before words are complex? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 50–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL]
Bürki, A., Ernestus, M., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2010). Is there only one “fenêtre” in the production lexicon? On-line evidence on the nature of phonological representations of pronunciation variants for French schwa words. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 421–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conwell, E. (2015). Neural responses to category ambiguous words. Neuropsychologia, 691, 85–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Token Frequency Effects in Homophone Production: An Elicitation Study. Language and Speech, 23830917737108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conwell, E., & Morgan, J. L. (2012). Is It a Noun or Is It a Verb? Resolving the Ambicategoricality Problem. Language Learning and Development, 8(2), 87–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2014). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–2012.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernestus, M. (2000). Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch, a corpus-based study of the phonology-phonetics interface. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua, 1421, 27–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Auditory Lexical Decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), 559–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Words and Voices: Perception and Production in an Episodic Lexicon. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 33–66). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemps, R. [Rachel], Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. R. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 430–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemps, R. [Rachèl], Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2004). Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 117–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisler, T., Reichel, U., & Schiel, F. (2017). Multilingual processing of speech via web services. Computer Speech and Language, 451, 326–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL]
Lahiri, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological appraoch to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 381, 245–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohmann, Arne (2020). Nouns and verbs in the speech signal: Are there phonetic correlates of grammatical category? Linguistics 58(6), 1877–1911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQueen, J. M. (2005). Speech Perception. In K. Lamberts & R. L. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of cognition (pp. 255–275). London: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitterer, H., & McQueen, J. M. (2009). Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(1), 244–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. (2001). Phoneme-like units and speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(5–6), 673–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), Typological studies in language: v. 45. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure (pp. 137–157). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, S., & Piccinini, P. (2018). On visualizing phonetic data from repeated measures experiments with multiple random effects. Journal of Phonetics, 701, 56–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing} [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Ranbom, L., & Connine, C. (2007). Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 273–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90(1), 51–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2015). E-Prime Professional (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweitzer, K., Walsh, M., Calhoun, S., Schütze, H., Möbius, B., Schweitzer, A., & Dogil, G. (2015). Exploring the relationship between intonation and the lexicon: Evidence for lexicalised storage of intonation. Speech Communication, 661, 65–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seyfarth, S., Garellek, M., Gillingham, G., Ackerman, F., & Malouf, R. (2017). Acoustic differences in morphologically-distinct homophones. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 88(2), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shatzman, K. B., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Prosodic knowledge affects the recognition of newly acquired words. Psychological Science, 17(5), 372–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorensen, J. M., Cooper, W. E., & Paccia, J. M. (1978). Speech timing of grammatical categories. Cognition, 6(2), 135–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sóskuthy, M., & Hay, J. (2017). Changing word usage predicts changing word durations in New Zealand English. Cognition, 1661, 298–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, B. V. (2011). The effect of reduction on the processing of flaps and /g/ in isolated words. Journal of Phonetics, 39(3), 312–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, B. V., Brenner, D., Danielson, D. K., Kelley, M. C., Nenadić, F., & Sims, M. (2019). The Massive Auditory Lexical Decision (MALD) database. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 1187–1204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turk, A. E., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2007). Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 445–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ussishkin, A., Dawson, C. R., Wedel, A., & Schluter, K. (2015). Auditory masked priming in Maltese spoken word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1096–1115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bürkle, Daniel Matthias
2025. Acoustic analysis of like in North-West England shows context effects, but not function effects. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue