Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp.68–97
Phonological and grammatical class cohorts in word production
Published online: 11 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.18008.pel
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.18008.pel
Abstract
The lexical or sub-lexical loci of facilitation of word production by phonological cueing/priming are debated. We
investigate whether phonological cues facilitate word production at the level of lexical selection by manipulating the size of the
cohort of word onsets matching the cue. In the framework of lexical facilitation, a phonological cue corresponding to a small
number of words should be more effective than a cue corresponding to a larger cohort. However, a lexical locus can clearly be
inferred only if the facilitation effect in picture naming is modulated by a specific grammatical lexical cohort and not by the
overall word onset cohort. Twenty-seven healthy participants performed an object/noun (Exp1) and an action/verb (Exp2) naming task
with cues corresponding to large/small noun/verb onset cohorts. Results revealed that facilitation was modulated by the lexical
onset cohort size of the cue in the target grammatical category. These results favour the lexical hypothesis and further suggest a
categorical organization of the lexicon.
Keywords: language production, facilitation, phonological, lexical, picture naming
Article outline
- Experiment 1
- Method
- Participants
- Materials and procedure
- Pre-analyses
- Results and discussion
- Method
- Experiment 2
- Method
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure and pre-analyses
- Results and discussion
- Method
- General discussion
- Phonological facilitation in object and action naming
- Modulation of facilitation effects by onset cohort size
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (84)
Abel, S., Dressel, K., Bitzer, R., Kümmerer, D., Mader, I., Weiller, C., & Huber, W. (2009). The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm. Neuroimage, 44(3), 1113–1124.
Abrams, L., White, K. K., & Eitel, S. L. (2003). Isolating phonological components that increase tip-of-the-tongue resolution. Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1153–1162.
Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and language, 88(1), 148–159.
Alario, F.-X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 531–552.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16 (1–2). pp. 151–168. ISSN 02687038.
Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 158–167.
Bowles, N. L., & Poon, L. W. (1985). Effects of priming in word retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 272–283.
Canny, J. (1986). A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI- 8(6), 679–698.
Cappa, S. F., Binetti, G., Pezzini, A., Padovani, A., Rozzini, L., & Trabucchi, M. (1998). Object and action naming in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 50(2), 351–355.
Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99(2), 205–235.
Damasio, A. R., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(11), 4957–4960.
Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 685–712.
Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 345–361.
Damian, M. F., Martin, R. C., & Martin, I. C. (1999). Semantic and Phonological Codes Interact in Single Word Production.
De Zubicaray, G. I., & McMahon, K. L. (2009). Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(3), 260–269.
De Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M. M., & Wilson, S. J. (2002). Orthographic/Phonological Facilitation of Naming Responses in the Picture–Word Task: An Event-Related fMRI Study Using Overt Vocal Responding. NeuroImage, 16(4), 1084–1093.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321.
Dell, G. S., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1992a). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42(1–3), 287–314.
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838.
Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 878–891.
Druks, J. (2000). Object and action naming battery. Psychology Press. Consulté à l’adresse [URL]
Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological review, 62(5), 369.
Farrell, M. T., & Abrams, L. (2014). Picture-word interference reveals inhibitory effects of syllable frequency on lexical selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 67(3), 525–541.
Fox, N. P., Reilly, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2015). Phonological neighborhood competition affects spoken word production irrespective of sentential context. Journal of memory and language, 831, 97–117.
Freedman, J. L., & Landauer, T. K. (2014). Retrieval of long-term memory: “Tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Psychonomic Science, 4(8), 309–310.
Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of memory and language, 66(4), 789–806.
Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 613–656.
Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2002). A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 20–55.
Grosjean, F., & Itzler, J. (1984). Can semantic constraint reduce the role of word frequency during spoken-word recognition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22(3), 180–182.
Heine, M. K., Ober, B. A., & Shenaut, G. K. (1999). Naturally occurring and experimentally induced tip-of-the-tongue experiences in three adult age groups. Psychology and Aging, 14(3), 445–457.
Heller, J. R., & Goldrick, M. (2014). Grammatical constraints on phonological encoding in speech production. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 21(6), 1576–1582.
Hodgson, C., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2008). Mimicking aphasic semantic errors in normal speech production: Evidence from a novel experimental paradigm. Brain and Language, 104(1), 89–101.
Jaeger, T. F., Furth, K., & Hilliard, C. (2012). Incremental Phonological Encoding during Unscripted Sentence Production. Frontiers in Psychology, 31.
James, L. E., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1378–1391.
Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 371–382.
Laganaro, M., & Alario, F.-X. (2006). On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 178–196.
Laganaro, M., Chetelat-Mabillard, D., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2013). Facilitatory and interfering effects of neighbourhood density on speech production: Evidence from aphasic errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 30(3), 127–146.
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38; discussion 38–75.
Levitt, A. G., & Healy, A. F. (1985). The roles of phoneme frequency, similarity, and availability in the experimental elicitation of speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(6), 717–733.
Longe, O., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2006). Grammatical categories in the brain: The role of morphological structure. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1812–1820.
Lüttmann, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2011). Sharing morphemes without sharing meaning: Production and comprehension of German verbs in the context of morphological relatives. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 65(3), 173.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1), 71–102.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8(1), 1–71.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 15(3), 576.
Mätzig, S., Druks, J., Masterson, J., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Noun and verb differences in picture naming: Past studies and new evidence. Cortex, 45(6), 738–758.
Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 715–726.
Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1146–1160.
Miller, G. A. (1991). The science of words. Consulté à l’adresse [URL]
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 228–252.
Mirman, D., Kittredge, A. K., & Dell, G. S. (2010). Effects of near and distant phonological neighbors on picture naming. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 321). Consulté à l’adresse [URL]
Mirman, D., Strauss, T. J., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2010). Effect of representational distance between meanings on recognition of ambiguous spoken words. Cognitive Science, 34(1), 161–173.
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 516–524.
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(03), 299–325.
Nusbaum, H. C., Pisoni, D. B., & Davis, C. K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on speech perception progress report, 10(10), 357–376.
Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 273–281.
Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(3), 539–557.
Pisoni, A., Cerciello, M., Cattaneo, Z., & Papagno, C. (2017). Phonological facilitation in picture naming: When and where? A tDCS study. Neuroscience, 3521, 106–121.
Posnansky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-Feature and Response Components in a Picture – Word Interference Task with Beginning and Skilled Readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
Protopapas, A. (2007). CheckVocal: a program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1–3), 107–142.
(2003). Modeling the relation between the production and recognition of spoken word forms. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, 115–158.
(2004). Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Memory & Cognition, 32(2), 212–222.
(2005). 3 Spoken word planning, comprehending, and self-monitoring: Evaluation ofWEAVER+. Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech, 421.
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & M, J. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 246–251.
Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive psychology, 681, 33–58.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. ittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102.
Schwitter, V., Boyer, B., Méot, A., Bonin, P., & Laganaro, M. (2004). French normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 564–576.
Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 497–525.
Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 686–698.
(1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 896–918.
Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(6), 683–692.
Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. Psychological bulletin, 128(3), 442.
Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40(3), 211–228.
(2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374–408.
(2005). Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of memory and language, 52(2), 193–204.
