Cover not available

Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:1 (2018) ► pp.105–142

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Discrete dimension accessibility in multidimensional concepts

The noun-adjective distinction

 | The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
 | Bar-Ilan University
 | University of Cologne
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.17011.fad
Abstract
Previous studies have identified that conceptual categories corresponding to nouns exhibit semantic domain effects: (1) classification into biological ones reflects a non-additive consideration of their defining dimensions whereas classification into artefactual and, presumably, social nouns is based on an additive one (2) nominal biological concepts are less graded than artifacts. Nevertheless, much uncertainty exists about the structure of conceptual categories corresponding to multidimensional adjectives. We propose that the effects observed for concepts corresponding to nouns are connected to a property we term discrete dimension accessibility and ask how it is manifested in multidimensional concepts corresponding to adjectives. We then hypothesize that (a) ratings of dimension-counting structures can be used as a diagnostic for these properties (b) the dimensions of multidimensional concepts corresponding to adjectives are inherently discrete. We report an acceptability rating experiment involving 42 adult Hebrew speakers revealing that with nouns, dimension-counting constructions with artefactual and social predicates are rated higher than ones with biological predicates, hence confirming (a). With adjectives, ratings for dimension-counting constructions remained high across the domain manipulation, hence confirming (b). We argue that the interaction between discrete dimension accessibility and lexical category indicates that lexical distinctions interact with conceptual ones.
Article outline
  • Category classification and dimensions
  • Domain effects on classification
  • Nouns and adjectives
  • The noun/adjective distinction and discrete dimension accessibility
  • Are adjectival dimensions inherently discrete?
  • Current study
  • Experiment
    • Participants
    • Methods
      • Materials
        • Pretest: Copula inclusion
      • Design and procedure
    • Results
      • The overall model
      • Predicate type × Domain × Structure
        • Structure and domain in nouns
        • Structure and domain in adjectives
      • Control items
      • Do artefactual and social categories pattern the same?
  • Discussion
    • Implications for models of lexical categorization
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (94)
References
Arad, M. (2005). Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. C. (2003). Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns and adjectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M., & Croft, W. (2017). Lexical categories: legacy, lacuna, and opportunity for functionalists and formalists. Annual Review of Linguistics, 31, 179–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, C. (2002). The dynamics of vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(1), 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. (1986). The construction of properties under perspectives. Journal of Semantics, 5(4), 293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barwise, J. & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 41, 159–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1967). Adjectives in English: attribution and predication. Lingua, 181, 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bollinger, D. (1980). Language, the Loaded Weapon: The Use and Abuse of Language Today. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, A. E., & Waxman, S. R. (2009). A horse of a different color: Specifying with precision infants’ mappings of novel nouns and adjectives. Child development, 80(1), 15–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. (2003). Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, 31–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1970). Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar (pp. 184–221). Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Constantinescu, C. (2011). Gradability in the Nominal Domain. Utrecht, Netherlands: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ Million Words, 1990-Present.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. (1982). Where have all the Adjectives Gone?: and other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Belin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estes, Z. (2003). Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories. Memory & Cognition, 31(2), 199–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: Definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1041–1047. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estes, Z., & Glucksberg, S. (2000). Interactive property attribution in concept combination. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 28–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finegan, E. (2006). Language: its structure and use, 5th edition. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, D., & Hackl, M. (2006). The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(5), 537–586. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books. First published 2000.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P., & Williams, M. A. (2001). Reasoning about categories in conceptual spaces. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference of Artificial Intelligence, 385–392.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hackl, M. (2001). Comparative quantifiers and plural predication. Proceedings of WCCFL XX, 234–247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, D. G., & Moore, C. E. (1997). Red bluebirds and black greenflies: Preschoolers’ understanding of the semantics of adjectives and count nouns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67(2), 236–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 201 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 441–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). 5. Concepts and Correct Thinking. Mind & Language, 4(1–2), 35–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Psychological representation of concepts. In M. A. Conway (ED.) Cognitive Models of Memory (pp. 81–110). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A., Storms, G., Simmons, C. L., & Heussen, D. (2009). Feature integration in natural language concepts. Memory & Cognition, 37(8), 1150–1163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, I. (2000). Degree Operators and Scope. Proceedings of SALT 101. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. 1995. The semantics of exception phrases. In J. van Eijck and J. van der Does (eds.) Quantifiers, Logic, and Language (pp. 145–177). CSLIGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmeister, P. & Norcliffe, E. (2013). Does resumption facilitate sentence comprehension ? In P. Hofmeister & E. Norcliffe (Eds.), The Core and the Periphery: Data-driven Perspectives on Syntax Inspired by Ivan A. Sag (pp. 1–25). Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of language. London: G. Allen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalish, C. W. (1995). Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories. Memory & Cognition, 23(3), 335–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, J. A. W. (1975). Two theories about adjectives. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 123–55). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (2005). Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 345–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(1), 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, I. (2009). Saturation and reification in adjectival diathesis. Journal of Linguistics, 45(2), 315–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landman, F. (1989). Groups, II. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(6), 723–744. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malt, B. C. (1990). Features and beliefs in the mental representation of categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(3), 289–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCloskey, M. E., & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets?. Memory & Cognition, 6(4), 462–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNally, L., and Stojanovic, I. (2015). Aesthetic adjectives. In J. Young (Ed.), The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44(12), 1469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), 113–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moltmann, F. (1995). Exception sentences and polyadic quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18(3), 223–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morzycki, M. (2011). Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. Natural Language Semantics, 19(1), 39–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The several faces of adnominal degree modification. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 291, 187–195.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, G. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(4), 700.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., & Aronoff, M. (1997). Contemporary Linguistics. New York: St.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind. London, England: Allen Lane. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustet, R. (2003). Copulas: Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rett, J. (2013). Similatives and the degree arguments of verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (4), 1101–1137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohde, D. (2003). Linger: a flexible platform for language processing experiments, version 2.94. Online: [URL].
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27–48). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rotstein, C., & Winter, Y. (2004). Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 12(3), 259–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sassoon, G. W. (2012). A typology of multidimensional adjectives. Journal of Semantics, 30(3), 335–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Multidimensionality in the grammar of gradability. Unpublished ms., Bar Ilan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sassoon, G., & Fadlon, J. (2017). The role of dimensions in classification under predicates predicts their status in degree constructions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, R. (2002). The grammar of measurement. Proceedings of SALT 121, 225–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax, 9(1), 67–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solt, S. (2009). The semantics of adjectives of quantity (Doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in progress), Multidimensionality, subjectivity and scales: experimental evidence. To appear in Castroviejo, E., Sassoon, G. W., and McNally, L. (Eds.) The Semantics of Gradability, Vagueness, and Scale Structure –Experimental Perspectives. Springer.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1997). Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 16(2–3), 145–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, L. (1997). Intransitive Predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, T. (1991). The alignment of arguments in adjective phrases. Syntax and Semantics, 251, 105–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, T. A. (1981). Origins of phrase structure (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stechow, A. V. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3(1–2), 1–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verheyen, S., Heussen, D., & Storms, G. (2011). On domain dfferences in categorization and context variety. Memory & Cognition, 39 (7), 1290–1300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Fintel, K. (1994). Restrictions on quantifier domains (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wattenmaker, W. D. (1995). Knowledge structures and linear separability: Integrating information in object and social categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 274–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1998). Object properties and Object kind: Twenty-one-month-old infants’ extension of novel adjectives. Child Development, 69(5), 1313–1329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wellwood, A. (2014). Measuring predicates (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(1), 67–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wetzer, H. (1996). The Typology of Adjectival Predication (Vol. 171). Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1980). Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Meltzer-Asscher, Aya
2021. Acceptability Studies in Semitic Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Syntax, ► pp. 505 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue