Article published In: The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:1 (2018) ► pp.74–104
The strength of meaning
Representations of new words with different properties in the L2 semantic network
Published online: 10 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.17005.bor
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.17005.bor
Abstract
In two experiments, we explored the integration of newly learned L2 German lexical units with differing semantic properties into
the L2 semantic network. Previous studies (Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., & Barnhardt, T. M. (1990). Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 328–340. for L1; Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Rogahn, M., Opitz, A., & Tschirner, E. (2016). Semantic representation of newly learned L2 words and their integration in the L2 lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. for L2) have indicated that the access to emergent representations
with weak memory traces is supported by a retrieval mechanism that inhibits their semantically related competitors with lower
activation thresholds and higher selection potential. In this study used pseudowords as novel L2 items and employed semantic
priming and semantic categorization tasks as well as an introspective post-test to explore whether the access to new L2 words is
modulated by meaning novelty (Experiment 1) and elaborateness (Experiment 2).
Keywords: mental lexicon, L2 learning, meaning acquisition, semantic inhibition, German
Article outline
- Introduction
- The present study
- Experiment 1: Existing vs. non-existing meanings
- Participants
- Learning phase
- Novel words
- Fillers
- Definitions
- Procedure
- Test phase
- Task 1: Semantically primed lexical decision
- Materials
- Procedure
- Task 2: Semantic categorization
- Procedure
- Post-test
- Results
- Procedure
- Experiment 2: Elaborate vs. non-elaborate meanings
- Participants
- Learning phase
- Novel words
- Definitions
- Test phase
- Task 1: Semantically primed lexical decision
- Task 2: Semantic categorization
- Post-test
- Results
- General discussion
- Notes
References
References (31)
Altmann, L. J., & McClung, J. S. (2008). Effects of semantic impairment on language use in Alzheimer’s disease. Seminars in speech and language, 29(1), 18–31.
Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary development. New York, NY: Guilford.
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Rogahn, M., Opitz, A., & Tschirner, E. (2016). Semantic representation of newly learned L2 words and their integration in the L2 lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication.
Bordag, D., Kirschenbaum, A., Tschirner, E., & Opitz, A. (2015). Incidental acquisition of new words during reading in L2: Inference of meaning and its integration in the L2 mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 372–390.
Borovsky, A., Kutas, M., & Elman, J. (2010). Learning to use words: Event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning. Cognition, 116(2), 289–296.
Breitenstein, C., Zwitserlood, P., de Vries, M. H., Feldhues, C., Knecht, S., & Dobel, C. (2007). Five days versus a lifetime: Intense associative vocabulary training generates lexically integrated words. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25(5), 493–500.
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C., & Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7(3), 161–189.
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 341–350.
Clay, F., Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2007). Teaching adults new words: The role of practice and consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 33(5), 970–976.
Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., & Barnhardt, T. M. (1990). Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 328–340.
Dagenbach, D., Horst, S., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Adding new information to semantic memory: How much learning is enough to produce automatic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 581–591.
Devitto, Z., & Burgess, C. (2004). Theoretical and methodological implications of language experience and vocabulary skill: Priming of strongly and weakly associated words. Brain and Cognition, 55(2), 295–299.
Elgort, I. (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61(2), 367–413.
Francis, W. S. (2005). Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 251–267). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Götz, D., Haensch, G., & Wellmann, H. (1998). Langenscheidts Großwörterbuch, Deutsch als Fremdsprache (1., neubearb. A., Nachdr. 2002.). München, Berlin: Langenscheidt KG.
Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1201, 358–394.
Keatley, C. W., Spinks, J. A., & De Gelder, B. (1994). Asymmetrical cross-language priming effects. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 70–84.
Leitner, S. (1972). So lernt man lernen. Der Weg zum Erfolg (How to learn to learn). Freiburg i. Br.: Herder.
Melinger, A. & Weber, A. (2006). Database of Noun Associations for German. [URL].
Mestres-Missé, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858–1866.
Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Taylor, K. I. (2007). Conceptual structure. In M. Gareth Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 217–234). Oxford: Oxford UP.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). University of South Florida Free Association Norms. Retrieved from [URL]. Cerebral Cortex, 17(8), 1858–1866.
Perfetti, C., Wlotko, E., & Hart, L. A. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 311, 1281–1292.
Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I. (2013). Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 1064–1074.
(2017). Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization. Cognition, 1581, 147–152.
Rehbock, H. (2010). Semantisches Merkmal. In Helmut Glück (Eds.): Metzler Lexikon Sprache. 4. Auflage. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.
Shtyrov, Y., Nikulin, V. V., & Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(50), 16864–16867
Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B. J., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neurocognitive account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(9), 1368–1401.
Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2013). Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 1001–1025.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Shang, Nan
García-Castro, Verónica & Norbert Vanek
Bordag, Denisa, Kira Gor & Andreas Opitz
Bordag, Denisa & Andreas Opitz
Gor, Kira, Svetlana Cook, Denisa Bordag, Anna Chrabaszcz & Andreas Opitz
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
