Cover not available

Article published In: New Questions for the Next Decade
Edited by Gonia Jarema, Gary Libben † and Victor Kuperman
[The Mental Lexicon 11:3] 2016
► pp. 329–349

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Meta-megastudies

 | National Chung Cheng University
Published online: 31 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.3.01mye
Cross-linguistic data have always been of interest to mental lexicon researchers, but only now are technological developments beginning to make it possible to treat language as a random variable, in an approach we dub meta-megastudies. A meta-megastudy uses regression techniques to tease apart not just factors that are partially confounded across items within languages, as in traditional megastudies, but also factors partially confounded across languages. While large-scale meta-megastudies will be logistically challenging, they promise great theoretical benefits and are becoming ever more feasible via Web-based coordination between independent research groups.
References (103)
Adelman, J.S., Johnson, R.L., McCormick, S.F., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J.S., Perry, J.R., Lupker, S.J., Forster, K.I., Cortese, M.J., Scaltritti, M., Aschenbrenner, A.J., Coane, J.H., White, L., Yap, M.J., Davis, C., Kim, J., & Davis, C.J. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1052–1067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alario, F.X., Perre, L., Castel, C., & Ziegler, J.C. (2007). The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition, 102(3), 464–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Sandler, W. (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language, 81(2), 301–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, D.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bader, M., & Häussler, J. (2010). Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 273–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailey, T.M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory & Language, 441, 569–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Cortese, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D.L., Simpson, G.B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 391, 445–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., & Cortese, M.J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing? In J.S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition (vol. 11, pp. 90–115). London: Psychology Press Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., Herron, D., Lu, C.-C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Tzeng, A., & Tzeng, O. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 344–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck B. (2001). Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 521, 369–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benkí, J.R. (2003). Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(3), 1689–1705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bi, Y., Wei, T., Janssen, N., & Han, Z. (2009). The contribution of orthography to spoken word production: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 555–560. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, B. (2015). Distributional typology: Statistical inquiries into the dynamics of linguistic diversity. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (2nd ed., pp. 901–923). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bishop, S. (2014). Science exposed. Scientific American, 311(4), 46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, C.H., Holman, E.W., & Wichmann, S. (2013). Sound correspondences in the world’s languages. Language, 89(1), 4–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cai, Z.-Q. (Ed.) (2008). How to read Chinese poetry: A guided anthology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, N.K., & Cohen-Goldberg, A.M. (2014). Lexical access in sign language: A computational model. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, J.-Y., Chen, T.-M., & Dell, G.S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 751–781. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, T.-M., Dell, G., & Chen, J.-Y. (2007). A cross-linguistic study of phonological units: Syllables emerge from the statistics of Mandarin Chinese, but not from the statistics of English. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 137–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 335–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clauson, K.A., Polen, H.H., Boulos, M.N.K., & Dzenowagis, J.H. (2008). Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 42(12), 1814–1821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen-Goldberg, A.M. (2012). Phonological competition within the word: Evidence from the phoneme similarity effect in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 184–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleman, T., & Greif, S. (2013). Discover meteor. URL: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, A., Alario, F.X., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2007). Cross-linguistic research on language production. In M.G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 531–546). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 101, 65–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1985). Cross-language psycholinguistics. Linguistics, 231, 659–667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cysouw, M. (2005). Quantitative methods in typology. In R. Kohler, G. Altmann, & R.G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch [Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook] (pp. 554–578). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, M.S. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68(1), 81–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). The evidence for word order correlations. Linguistic Typology, 15(2), 335–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dufau, S., Duñabeitia, J.A., Moret-Tatay, C., McGonigal, A., Peeters, D., Alario, F.X., Balota, D.A., Brysbaert, M., Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Ktori, M., Perea, M., Rastle, K., Sasburg, O., Yap, M.J., Ziegler, J.C., & Grainger, J. (2011). Smart phone, smart science: How the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science. PloS One, 6(9), e24974. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrett, G., & DeNero, J. (2013). Supervised learning of complete morphological paradigms. Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL) , pp. 1185–1195.
Erlewine, M.Y., & Kotek, H. (2016). A streamlined approach to online linguistic surveys. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34(2), 481–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Cutler, A. (2015). Baldey: A database of auditory lexical decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1469–1488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S.C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4), 1079–1100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenlon, J., Schembri, A., Rentelis, R., Vinson, D., & Cormier, K. (2014). Using conversational data to determine lexical frequency in british sign Language: The influence of text type. Lingua, 1431, 187–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 488–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, K.I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1109–1115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, R.A. (1984). Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(4), 526–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47(1), 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gandour, J., Xu, Y., Wong, D., Dzemidzic, M., Lowe, M., Li, X., & Tong, Y. (2003). Neural correlates of segmental and tonal information in speech perception. Human Brain Mapping, 20(4), 185–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, J., Nosek, B.A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P.H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J.H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M.S., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (Eds.) (2005). The world atlas of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heylighen, F. (2007). Why is open access development so successful? Stigmergic organization and the economics of information. In B. Lutterbeck, M. Bärwolff, & R.A. Gehring (Eds.), Open source jahrbuch 2007. Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchison, K.A., Balota, D.A., Neely, J.H., Cortese, M.J., Cohen-Shikora, E.R., Tse, C.S., Yap, M.J., Bengson, J.J., Niemeyer, D., & Buchanan, E. (2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1099–1114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iacoponi, L., & Savy, R. (2011). Sylli: Automatic phonological syllabification for Italian. Interspeech 20111, 641–644.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, T.F., & Norcliffe, E.J. (2009). The cross-linguistic study of sentence production. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3/41, 866–887. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Balota, D.A. (2015). Megastudies, crowdsourcing, and large datasets in psycholinguistics: An overview of recent developments. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68 (8), 1457–1468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono-and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1665–1692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirby, J.P., & Yu, A.C.L. (2007). Lexical and phonotactic effects on wordlikeness judgments in Cantonese. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 161, 1389–1392.
Klein, D., Zatorre, R.J., Milner, B., & Zhao, V. (2001). A cross-linguistic PET study of tone perception in Mandarin Chinese and English speakers. Neuroimage, 13(4), 646–653. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupferberg, N., & Protus, B.M. (2011). Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia: An assessment. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(4), 310–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, H.-H. (2016). A comparative study of the phonology of Taiwan Sign Language and Signed Chinese. Unpublished National Chung Cheng University Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R.H., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (1), 12–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(01), 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, M.P., Simons, G.F., Fennig, C.D. (Eds.) (2014). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (7th ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Light, T. (1977). The Cantonese final: An exercise in indigenous analysis. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 5(1), 75–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luce, P.A., & Large, N.R. (2001). Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16(5/6), 565–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malins, J.G., & Joanisse, M.F. (2010). The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(4), 407–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malmqvist, G. (1994). Chinese linguistics. In G. Lepschy (Ed.), History of linguistics: Volume I: The Eastern traditions of linguistics (pp. 1–24). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Tong, X., Shu, H., Wong, A.M.Y., Leung, K.W., & Tardif, T. (2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(2), 171–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, R.P. (2002). Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In R.P. Meier & K. Cormier (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R.H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, J. (2007). Generative morphology as psycholinguistics. In G. Jarema & G. Libben (Eds.), The mental lexicon: Core perspectives (pp. 105–128). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Chinese as a natural experiment. In G. Libben, G. Jarema, & C. Westbury (Eds.), Methodological and analytic frontiers in lexical research (pp. 155–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Markedness and lexical typicality in Mandarin acceptability judgments. Language & Linguistics, 16(6). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, J., & Chen, T.-Y. (2016). The time course of sociolinguistic influences on wordlikeness judgments. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics (pp. 119–122). International Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, J., & Tsay, J. (2005). The processing of phonological acceptability judgments. Proceedings of Symposium on 90–92 NSC Projects (pp. 26–45). Taipei, Taiwan, May.
Nathan, D. (2013). Access and accessibility at ELAR, a social networking archive for endangered languages documentation. In M. Turin, C. Wheeler, & E. Wilkinson (Eds.), Oral literature in the digital age: Archiving orality and connecting with communities. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F.J. (2005). Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing discovery: The new era of networked science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norcliffe, E., Harris, A.C., & Jaeger, T.F. (2015). Cross-linguistic psycholinguistics and its critical role in theory development: Early beginnings and recent advances. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1009–1032. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1988). The relative accessibility of phonemes and syllables. Perception & Psychophysics, 43(6), 541–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Brien, R.M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Quality & Quantity, 411, 673–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Seaghdha, P.G., Chen, J.-Y., & Chen, T.-M. (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 1151, 282–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Close but not proximate: The significance of phonological segments in speaking depends on their functional engagement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(1), E3. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qu, Q., Damian, M.F., & Kazanina, N. (2012). Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(35), 14265–14270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Reply to O’Seaghdha et al.: Primary phonological planning units in Chinese are phonemically specified. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(1), E4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., McCormick, S.F., Bayliss, L., & Davis, C.J. (2011). Orthography influences the perception and production of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1588–1594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rentzepopoulos, P.A., & Kokkinakis, G.K. (1996). Efficient multilingual phoneme-to-grapheme conversion based on HMM. Computational Linguistics, 22(3), 351–376.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, S., Libben, G., & Derwing, B. (2002). Morphological representation in an endangered, polysynthetic language. Brain and Language, 81(1), 473–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (2015). A Chinese phonological enigma. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 431, 679–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (1999). Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In T.A. Hall & U. Kleinhenz (Eds.), Studies on the phonological word (pp. 223–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singleton, J.L., & Newport, E.L. (2004). When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology 491, 370–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sze, W.P., Liow, S.J.R., & Yap, M.J. (2014). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 263–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., Lu, C.-C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Tzeng, A., Tzeng, O., Arévalo, A., Vargha, A., Butler, A.C., Buffngton, R., & Bates, E. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 247–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tse, C.-S., Yap, M.J., Chan, Y.-L., Sze, W.-P., Shaoul, C., & Lin, D. (forthcoming). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods.
Tseng, C.-H., Huang, K.-Y., & Jeng, J.-Y. (1996). The role of the syllable in perceiving spoken Chinese. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences , 6 (1), 71–86.
Vittinghoff, E., & McCulloch, C.E. (2007). Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165(6), 710–718. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Bastian, C.C., Locher, A., & Ruflin, M. (2013). Tatool: A Java-based open-source programming framework for psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 108–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weskott, T., & Fanselow, G. (2011). On the informativity of different measures of linguistic acceptability. Language, 87(2), 249–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, A.W.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2008). Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34(5), 1172–1190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yap, M.J., Liow, S.J.R., Jalil, S.B., & Faizal, S.S.B. (2010). The Malay Lexicon Project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 992–1003. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, L., & Shu, H. (2003). Hanyu yanyu chansheng de yuyin jiagong jizhi [Phonological processing mechanism in Chinese speech production]. Xinli Kexue, 26(5), 818–822.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, M., Mo, C., & Mo, L. (2014). The role of phoneme in Mandarin Chinese production: Evidence from ERPs. PloS one, 9(9), e106486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, M., Mo, C., Li, Y., & Mo, L. (2015). Distinct representations of syllables and phonemes in Chinese production: Evidence from fMRI adaptation. Neuropsychologia, 771, 253–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Chen, Tsung-Ying & James Myers
2021. Worldlikeness: a Web crowdsourcing platform for typological psycholinguistics. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s1 DOI logo
Aguasvivas, Jose, Manuel Carreiras, Marc Brysbaert, Paweł Mandera, Emmanuel Keuleers & Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
2020. How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy. Behavior Research Methods 52:5 ► pp. 1867 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Tsung-Ying
2020. An inductive learning bias toward phonetically driven tonal phonotactics. Language Acquisition 27:3 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Do, Youngah & Ryan Ka Yau Lai
2020. Incorporating tone in the modelling of wordlikeness judgements. Phonology 37:4 ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Aguasvivas, Jose Armando, Manuel Carreiras, Marc Brysbaert, Paweł Mandera, Emmanuel Keuleers & Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
2018. SPALEX: A Spanish Lexical Decision Database From a Massive Online Data Collection. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue