Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistic Perspectives on Morphological Processing
Edited by Harald Clahsen, Vera Heyer and Jana Reifegerste
[The Mental Lexicon 11:2] 2016
► pp. 216–241

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Gender Features in German

Evidence for Underspecification

 | Leipzig University
 | Leipzig University
Published online: 28 July 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.2.03opi
Current theoretical approaches to inflectional morphology make extensive use of the two concepts of abstract feature decomposition and underspecification. Psycholinguistic models of inflection, in contrast, generally lack such more differentiated morphological analyses. This paper reports a series of behavioral experiments that investigate the processing of grammatical gender of nouns in German. The results of these experiments support the idea that elements in the mental lexicon may be underspecified with regard to their grammatical features. However, contrary to all established morphological and psycholinguistic approaches, we provide evidence that even the lexical representation of bare noun stems is characterized by underspecified gender information. The observation that the domain of underspecification of grammatical features extends from inflectional markers to noun stems, supports the idea that underspecification is a more general characteristic of the mental lexicon. We conclude that this finding is mainly driven by economical reasons: a feature (or feature value) that is never used for grammatical operations (e.g., inflectional marking or evaluation of agreement) is not needed in the language system at all.
References (35)
Blevins, J. (1995). Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 181, 113–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bordag, D., & Pechmann, Th. (2008). Grammatical gender in speech production: Evidence from Czech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 371, 69–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 101, 425–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 281, 297–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., Hadler, M., & Sonnenstuhl, I. (2001). The mental representation of inflected words: An experimental study of adjectives and verbs in German. Language, 771, 510–543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G., & Fraser, N. (1993). Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics, 291, 113–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Martino, M., Bracco, G., & Laudanna, A. (2011). The activation of grammatical gender information in processing Italian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 745–776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A.D., & Jacobson, Th. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 281, 467–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frisson, St., & Pickering, M.J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 1366–1383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (2001). Optimal clitic positions and the lexicon in romance clitic systems. In G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw, & S. Vikner (Eds.), Optimal theoretic syntax (pp. 205–240). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Vol. 24 of current studies in linguistics (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994). Some key features of distributed morphology. In H.H. Andrew Carnie & T. Bures (Eds.), MITWPL: Papers on Phonology and Morphology, Vol. 211 (pp. 275–288). Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, V.M., & Segui, J. (2004). Sublexical and lexical influences on gender assignment in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 331, 425–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janssen, U., & Penke, M. (2002). How are inflectional affixes organized in the mental lexicon? Evidence from the investigation of agreement errors in agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 811, 180–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (2009). Case syncretism in German feminines: Typological, functional and structural aspects. In P. Steinkrüger & M. Krifka (Eds.), On inflection (pp. 141–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified recognition. Labphon, 71, 637–676.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Distinctive features: phonological under-specification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 381, 44–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 221, 1–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lukatela, G., Gligorijević, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M.T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 81, 415–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meunier, F., Seigneuric, A., & Spinelli, E. (2008). The morpheme gender effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 88–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Opitz, A., Regel, St., Müller, G., & Friederici, A.D. (2013). Neurophysiological evidence for morphological underspecification in German strong adjective inflection. Language, 891, 231–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penke, M. (2006). Flexion im mentalen Lexikon. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penke, M., Janssen, U., & Eisenbeiss, S. (2004). Psycholinguistic evidence for the underspecification of morphosyntactic features. Brain and Language, 901, 423–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M.J., & Frisson, St. (2001). Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 271, 556–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 891, 60–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 191, 841–850. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiller, N.O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 481, 169–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M.S., & Gonnerman, L.M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 353–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, G. (2001). Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trommer, J. (2006). Person and number agreement in Dumi. Linguistics, 441, 1011–1057. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wegera, Kl.-P. (1997). Das Genus: Ein Beitrag zur Didaktik des DaF-Unterrichts. Munich: Iudicum-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wunderlich, D. (1996). Minimalist morphology: The role of paradigms. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp. 93–114). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Kupisch, Tanja & Roswita Dressler
2024. Gender assignment in German as a heritage language in an English-speaking context. In Perspectives on Input, Evidence, and Exposure in Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 69], ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Klassen, Rachel, Björn Lundquist & Marit Westergaard
2023. L1 Grammatical Gender Variation through the Representation in the Lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:2 ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Kramer, Ruth & Hannah Sande
2023. Different number, different gender: Comparing Romanian and Guébie. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo
Seyboth, Margret & Frank Domahs
2023. Why do He and She Disagree: The Role of Binary Morphological Features in Grammatical Gender Agreement in German. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:3 ► pp. 923 ff. DOI logo
Kupisch, Tanja, Miriam Geiss, Natalia Mitrofanova & Marit Westergaard
2022. Structural and phonological cues for gender assignment in monolingual and bilingual children acquiring German. Experiments with real and nonce words. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo
Pinta, Justin
2022. Gender Agreement in Correntino Spanish. Journal of Language Contact 14:3 ► pp. 609 ff. DOI logo
Lohndal, Terje & Marit Westergaard
2021. Grammatical Gender: Acquisition, Attrition, and Change. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Ruberg, Tobias
2021. Gender agreement in SLI: A study on production and inflection of articles in German. Language Acquisition 28:2 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
BORDAG, DENISA, AMIT KIRSCHENBAUM, MARIA ROGAHN, ANDREAS OPITZ & ERWIN TSCHIRNER
2019. Misbehaved masculines: Incidental acquisition of grammatical gender in L2 German during reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:1 ► pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Kimball, Amelia E., Kailen Shantz, Christopher Eager & Joseph Roy
2019. Confronting Quasi-Separation in Logistic Mixed Effects for Linguistic Data: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 26:3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue